From Kaplan LSAT explanation
"Despite the technical jargon, this stimulus is actually made up of a bunch of formal logic
statements. Take the third sentence: If X (yellow to black), then either Y (polypyrroles form
on zeolites) or Z (polypyrroles form in zeolites). The last sentence tells us that X occurred
(yellow to black), but Y didn’t. From this we can deduce that Z must have occurred:
polypyrroles formed from pyrroles inside the zeolite. The second sentence tells us that
when polypyrroles form inside the zeolites, they form in delicate chains. Therefore, we can
infer (C): some of the pyrroles in which the zeolite was submerged formed into
polypyrrole chains.
(A) The stimulus says that the zeolite was “free of any pyrrole” before it was submerged,
so (A) is impossible.
(B) Since the polypyrroles must have formed in and not on the zeolite, they must have
been formed as chains, not lumps.
(D) There’s no reason why some pyrrole couldn’t attach itself to the zeolite; all we know is
that no polypyrroles formed from pyrroles on the zeolite.
(E) Since the polypyrroles formed inside the zeolite, we know some pyrroles reached the
zeolite’s inner channels; we have absolutely no reason to infer that only a “little” did so."