Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 00:37 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 00:37
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
tarek99
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
5,040
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 768
Kudos: 5,040
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the 01 Dec 2007, 13:27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the cost of equipment have made recycling paper into new paper products much more cost-efficient over the last twenty years. Despite these advances, though, the "point of price viability" (the price that new paper made from trees must reach to make recycled paper comparable in price) is unchanged at $2.12 per ream of paper.

Which of the following, if true, most explains why the increased cost-efficiency of recycled paper has not lowered the point of price viability?


a) The cost of unprocessed trees to make new paper has fallen dramatically.

b) The decreases in the cost of recycling equipment have occurred despite increases in the cost of raw materials required to manufacture such equipment.

c) Innovations in production technology have made it much more cost-efficient to produce new paper from trees.

d) Most paper is made from the scraps and sawdust left after processing new trees for lumber, rather than directly from the trees themselves.

e) When the price of planting new saplings to replace cut trees becomes more expensive, forests reserves not previously worth cutting become cost-effective to cut


Please explain your answer



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
User avatar
GMATBLACKBELT
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Last visit: 03 Jun 2013
Posts: 1,139
Own Kudos:
1,878
Posts: 1,139
Kudos: 1,878
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the 01 Dec 2007, 13:33
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tarek99
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the cost of equipment have made recycling paper into new paper products much more cost-efficient over the last twenty years. Despite these advances, though, the "point of price viability" (the price that new paper made from trees must reach to make recycled paper comparable in price) is unchanged at $2.12 per ream of paper.

Which of the following, if true, most explains why the increased cost-efficiency of recycled paper has not lowered the point of price viability?


a) The cost of unprocessed trees to make new paper has fallen dramatically.

b) The decreases in the cost of recycling equipment have occurred despite increases in the cost of raw materials required to manufacture such equipment.

c) Innovations in production technology have made it much more cost-efficient to produce new paper from trees.

d) Most paper is made from the scraps and sawdust left after processing new trees for lumber, rather than directly from the trees themselves.

e) When the price of planting new saplings to replace cut trees becomes more expensive, forests reserves not previously worth cutting become cost-effective to cut


Please explain your answer
Show more


Either A or C. I vote C.
User avatar
walker
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 2,398
Own Kudos:
10,717
Given Kudos: 362
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Posts: 2,398
Kudos: 10,717
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the 03 Dec 2007, 06:10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
also C
User avatar
Beyond700
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Last visit: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 206
Own Kudos:
104
Posts: 206
Kudos: 104
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the 03 Dec 2007, 07:32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tarek99
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the cost of equipment have made recycling paper into new paper products much more cost-efficient over the last twenty years. Despite these advances, though, the "point of price viability" (the price that new paper made from trees must reach to make recycled paper comparable in price) is unchanged at $2.12 per ream of paper.

Which of the following, if true, most explains why the increased cost-efficiency of recycled paper has not lowered the point of price viability?


a) The cost of unprocessed trees to make new paper has fallen dramatically.

b) The decreases in the cost of recycling equipment have occurred despite increases in the cost of raw materials required to manufacture such equipment.

c) Innovations in production technology have made it much more cost-efficient to produce new paper from trees.

d) Most paper is made from the scraps and sawdust left after processing new trees for lumber, rather than directly from the trees themselves.

e) When the price of planting new saplings to replace cut trees becomes more expensive, forests reserves not previously worth cutting become cost-effective to cut

Please explain your answer
Show more


Between 'A' & 'C' ..

Will go for 'C'

Technological advances in prodution are the same for both new paper and recycled paper......
User avatar
Amardeep Sharma
User avatar
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Last visit: 24 Mar 2019
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
577
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 219
Kudos: 577
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the 03 Dec 2007, 08:30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tarek99
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the cost of equipment have made recycling paper into new paper products much more cost-efficient over the last twenty years. Despite these advances, though, the "point of price viability" (the price that new paper made from trees must reach to make recycled paper comparable in price) is unchanged at $2.12 per ream of paper.

Which of the following, if true, most explains why the increased cost-efficiency of recycled paper has not lowered the point of price viability?


a) The cost of unprocessed trees to make new paper has fallen dramatically.

b) The decreases in the cost of recycling equipment have occurred despite increases in the cost of raw materials required to manufacture such equipment.

c) Innovations in production technology have made it much more cost-efficient to produce new paper from trees.

d) Most paper is made from the scraps and sawdust left after processing new trees for lumber, rather than directly from the trees themselves.

e) When the price of planting new saplings to replace cut trees becomes more expensive, forests reserves not previously worth cutting become cost-effective to cut


Please explain your answer
Show more


though A and C are very close, I will go with A

reason- Innovation in production technology is common for both reclyled paper and new paper from trees. The only difference could be that the cost of unprocessed tree, which is the raw material for producing paper, has dramatically reduced.

Amar
User avatar
tarek99
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
5,040
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 768
Kudos: 5,040
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the 03 Dec 2007, 13:59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA is C
User avatar
Beyond700
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Last visit: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 206
Own Kudos:
104
Posts: 206
Kudos: 104
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the 03 Dec 2007, 17:46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Amardeep Sharma
tarek99
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the cost of equipment have made recycling paper into new paper products much more cost-efficient over the last twenty years. Despite these advances, though, the "point of price viability" (the price that new paper made from trees must reach to make recycled paper comparable in price) is unchanged at $2.12 per ream of paper.

Which of the following, if true, most explains why the increased cost-efficiency of recycled paper has not lowered the point of price viability?


a) The cost of unprocessed trees to make new paper has fallen dramatically.

b) The decreases in the cost of recycling equipment have occurred despite increases in the cost of raw materials required to manufacture such equipment.

c) Innovations in production technology have made it much more cost-efficient to produce new paper from trees.

d) Most paper is made from the scraps and sawdust left after processing new trees for lumber, rather than directly from the trees themselves.

e) When the price of planting new saplings to replace cut trees becomes more expensive, forests reserves not previously worth cutting become cost-effective to cut


Please explain your answer

though A and C are very close, I will go with A

reason- Innovation in production technology is common for both reclyled paper and new paper from trees. The only difference could be that the cost of unprocessed tree, which is the raw material for producing paper, has dramatically reduced.

Amar
Show more


Amar,

At my first go, I was going for 'A', for similar reason as yours.. Then I realised that the fact about 'Innovation in production technology for new paper' is not in the original premise but in one of the possible explanations (answer choice). :)
User avatar
Skewed
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Last visit: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
172
Posts: 85
Kudos: 172
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the 03 Dec 2007, 18:32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anyone offer a compelling explanation as to why C is superior to A?

Both explain why the increased cost-efficiency hasn't made a dent in the price viability.
User avatar
tarek99
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
5,040
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 768
Kudos: 5,040
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the 04 Dec 2007, 04:49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think the reason why C is superior to A is that A addresses only one of the 2 elements at issue: the cost of unprocessed trees. even if the cost of the tree is cheaper, the technology used could still be expensive and, therefore, not result to efficiency. don't forget, in "resolve the paradox" question, you have to address how the 2 points at issue can co-exist. option A talks about only one of the 2 elements, which is the raw material, and doesn't even talk about technology. the correct anwer choice must mention how the 2 can exist together to produce the result mentioned in the argument: produce efficiency.

In option C, it talks about technology and our desired result of efficiency. now whether or not the unprocessed trees were expensive still reaches to our desired result of efficiency. that's how i see it at least and that's why it makes sense to me. hope this helps!
User avatar
Amardeep Sharma
User avatar
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Last visit: 24 Mar 2019
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
577
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 219
Kudos: 577
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the 04 Dec 2007, 05:52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Beyond700
Amardeep Sharma
tarek99
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the cost of equipment have made recycling paper into new paper products much more cost-efficient over the last twenty years. Despite these advances, though, the "point of price viability" (the price that new paper made from trees must reach to make recycled paper comparable in price) is unchanged at $2.12 per ream of paper.

Which of the following, if true, most explains why the increased cost-efficiency of recycled paper has not lowered the point of price viability?


a) The cost of unprocessed trees to make new paper has fallen dramatically.

b) The decreases in the cost of recycling equipment have occurred despite increases in the cost of raw materials required to manufacture such equipment.

c) Innovations in production technology have made it much more cost-efficient to produce new paper from trees.

d) Most paper is made from the scraps and sawdust left after processing new trees for lumber, rather than directly from the trees themselves.

e) When the price of planting new saplings to replace cut trees becomes more expensive, forests reserves not previously worth cutting become cost-effective to cut


Please explain your answer

though A and C are very close, I will go with A

reason- Innovation in production technology is common for both reclyled paper and new paper from trees. The only difference could be that the cost of unprocessed tree, which is the raw material for producing paper, has dramatically reduced.

Amar

Amar,

At my first go, I was going for 'A', for similar reason as yours.. Then I realised that the fact about 'Innovation in production technology for new paper' is not in the original premise but in one of the possible explanations (answer choice). :)
Show more


oh ya, you are absolutely correct, you hit the nail in right place...thnx buddy :-D

Amar
User avatar
Beyond700
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Last visit: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 206
Own Kudos:
104
Posts: 206
Kudos: 104
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the 04 Dec 2007, 06:07
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skewed
Can anyone offer a compelling explanation as to why C is superior to A?

Both explain why the increased cost-efficiency hasn't made a dent in the price viability.
Show more


For me, choice 'A' fails to cover cost for trees waiting to be cut. The cause here has a very short life span.

In other words only those trees that are already cut become cheaper and not the whole process of cutting the fresh trees to produce new paper.

Only long term and definite causes will have a direct impact on 'point of price viability' and not the adhoc ones.

Also the quantity of 'cut trees' is ignored, it could be so small that it may not influence the market price
User avatar
Beyond700
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Last visit: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 206
Own Kudos:
104
Posts: 206
Kudos: 104
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the 04 Dec 2007, 06:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Amardeep Sharma
Beyond700
Amardeep Sharma
[quote="tarek99"]Innovations in production technology and decreases in the cost of equipment have made recycling paper into new paper products much more cost-efficient over the last twenty years. Despite these advances, though, the "point of price viability" (the price that new paper made from trees must reach to make recycled paper comparable in price) is unchanged at $2.12 per ream of paper.

Which of the following, if true, most explains why the increased cost-efficiency of recycled paper has not lowered the point of price viability?


a) The cost of unprocessed trees to make new paper has fallen dramatically.

b) The decreases in the cost of recycling equipment have occurred despite increases in the cost of raw materials required to manufacture such equipment.

c) Innovations in production technology have made it much more cost-efficient to produce new paper from trees.

d) Most paper is made from the scraps and sawdust left after processing new trees for lumber, rather than directly from the trees themselves.

e) When the price of planting new saplings to replace cut trees becomes more expensive, forests reserves not previously worth cutting become cost-effective to cut


Please explain your answer

though A and C are very close, I will go with A

reason- Innovation in production technology is common for both reclyled paper and new paper from trees. The only difference could be that the cost of unprocessed tree, which is the raw material for producing paper, has dramatically reduced.

Amar

Amar,

At my first go, I was going for 'A', for similar reason as yours.. Then I realised that the fact about 'Innovation in production technology for new paper' is not in the original premise but in one of the possible explanations (answer choice). :)

oh ya, you are absolutely correct, you hit the nail in right place...thnx buddy :-D

Amar[/quote]

We are in the same boat. :)



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts