In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. Walk into the Heart's Delight, a store that started selling organic fruits and vegetables and whole-grain flours in the 1960's, and you will also find a wide selection of cheeses made with high butterfat content. Next door, the owners of the Good Earth Café, an old vegetarian restaurant, are still making a modest living, but the owners of the new House of Beef across the street are millionaires.
The basis of the argument that people in general are not concerned on about the consumption of fatty cheese and red intake based on the comparison of two cafe, where the vegetarian cafe is having a modest earning but the meat cafe owners are millionaires, is flawed due to several reasons.
Firstly the portion of the argument where the Good earth Cafe is having modest living is concluded on the basis that people are not enjoying dishes made from organic vegetables and hence their living is less compared to House of Beef. However it is flawed because there are several reasons as to why the dishes of the vegetarian cafe are disliked by the consumer. In order to know to investigate further, it is essential to know the answer of the following questions: How is the tatse, quality and hygenie of food? What is the price of the dish? Do they make food from organic vegetables or those fertilized with sythentic chemicals? What was their profit curve a decade back?If they are preparing food from vegetables fertilized with synthetic chemicals, there is a high probability that people will not prefer them or if they keep minimal profit due to high price of organic vegetables, they are likely to earn less
Secondly the owners of the House of Beef Cafe are said to millionaires when it is located just across the street. However, just assuming the fact that huge consumption of the red meat by the people, it is flawed. There can be several reasons why they are millionaires. The price charged per dish of meat could be large, giving them huge profit. Owners might have a different source of income altogether which makes them millionaires. Either way, this argument is flawed because this prompt provides no information on the source of income of the owners or relaible evidence which shows that people consuming huge amounts in the last 10 years of red meat increased their profits.
Thirdly, the fact that Heart's Delight sells organic fruits and vegetables along with fatty cheeses do not indicate the inclination of people towards the purchase of fatty cheese. Fatty cheese might attract a different set of consumer base who are fond of cheese. However this does not indicate that the majority of the consumers in the store are buyers of cheese and not organic food materials. It is also not mentioned whether the sale of cheese started in 1960 or just a decade earlier thus contradicting the prompt.
To conclude, the prompt lacks reliable information and evidence at various portions thus not being able to establish that people are not concerned about red meat and fatty cheese intake during the last decade.