Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare.
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
Intellectual property laws protect patent holders from infringements that would otherwise cut into their revenue streams. Because the cost to research and develop new products that can be patented can be astronomically high and companies want to ensure that these costs are defrayed and not sunk, most companies support patent laws that are as legally stringent and long-lasting as possible. However, strict patent laws allow companies with the most funds devoted to research and development to dominate industries and shut down innovative competition. As a result, less strict patent laws are often more conducive to true innovation; in the long run, this lack of innovation decreases industry-wide profits, even for the largest companies. In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
• (A) The first is an assumption, rejected by the argument, that is used to justify a certain strategy; the second is that strategy • (B) The first is a factor used to justify the adoption of a certain position; the second presents the intended outcome of that position • (C) The first is a factor used to support a position that the argument supports; the second is that position • (D) The first is a factor used to argue that a certain position may not have the consequences for which it is intended; the second is a justification for that position • (E) The first is a factor that is used to explain the adoption of a certain position; the second is that position.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Intellectual property laws protect patent holders from infringements that would otherwise cut into their revenue streams. Because the cost to research and develop new products that can be patented can be astronomically high and companies want to ensure that these costs are defrayed and not sunk, most companies support patent laws that are as legally stringent and long-lasting as possible. However, strict patent laws allow companies with the most funds devoted to research and development to dominate industries and shut down innovative competition. As a result, less strict patent laws are often more conducive to true innovation; in the long run, this lack of innovation decreases industry-wide profits, even for the largest companies. In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
• (A) The first is an assumption, rejected by the argument, that is used to justify a certain strategy; the second is that strategy • (B) The first is a factor used to justify the adoption of a certain position; the second presents the intended outcome of that position • (C) The first is a factor used to support a position that the argument supports; the second is that position • (D) The first is a factor used to argue that a certain position may not have the consequences for which it is intended; the second is a justification for that position • (E) The first is a factor that is used to explain the adoption of a certain position; the second is that position.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.