GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 24 Aug 2019, 00:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Investigations along the Solo river in Indonesia have led some archeol

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2016
Posts: 19
Investigations along the Solo river in Indonesia have led some archeol  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2016, 10:42
1
15
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (01:18) correct 28% (01:26) wrong based on 345 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Investigations along the Solo river in Indonesia have led some archeologists to debunk the idea of an era in which Homo Erectus had still survived in then Homo Sapiens’ inhabited areas.

(A) in which Homo Erectus had still survived in then Homo Sapiens’ inhabited areas
(B) in which Homo Erectus still survived in areas inhabited by Homo Sapiens
(C) when Homo Erectus still survived where there were areas inhabited by Homo Sapiens
(D) when Homo Erectus had still survived in current Homo Sapiens areas
(E) when Homo Erectus still survived in areas that were then Homo Sapiens’
Marshall & McDonough Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1681
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Investigations along the Solo river in Indonesia have led some archeol  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2016, 11:05
1
Past Perfect is not needed here - A and D are out

Usage of 'where' is incorrect in C.

Between B and E:
B) In which Homo Erectus still survived in areas inhabited by Homo Sapiens - Correct
E) When Homo Erectus still survived in areas that were then Homo Sapiens’ - Incorrect - Changes meaning. Also 'in which' seems to be more appropriate here than 'when'.

Answer: B
Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 833
Re: Investigations along the Solo river in Indonesia have led some archeol  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Sep 2018, 02:46
in choice E, "Sapien's area" dose not mean "inhabited by Sapien". meaning is changed. E is gone.
Director
Director
User avatar
V
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Posts: 696
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.35
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Investigations along the Solo river in Indonesia have led some archeol  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2019, 03:20
Quote:
Investigations along the Solo river in Indonesia have led some archeologists to debunk the idea of an era in which Homo Erectus had still survived in then Homo Sapiens??? inhabited areas.

(A) in which Homo Erectus had still survived in then Homo Sapiens??? inhabited areas
(B) in which Homo Erectus still survived in areas inhabited by Homo Sapiens
(C) when Homo Erectus still survived where there were areas inhabited by Homo Sapiens
(D) when Homo Erectus had still survived in current Homo Sapiens areas
(E) when Homo Erectus still survived in areas that were then Homo Sapiens???


HI GMATNinja, DmitryFarber, MagooshExpert (Carolyn), generis, jennpt , GMATGuruNY

Why is in which more appropriate than when?

Isn't when modifying era(time)?
_________________
आत्मनॊ मोक्षार्थम् जगद्धिताय च

Resource: GMATPrep RCs With Solution
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 502
GMAT 1: 670 Q46 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
Re: Investigations along the Solo river in Indonesia have led some archeol  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2019, 06:34
happy1992 wrote:
Investigations along the Solo river in Indonesia have led some archeologists to debunk the idea of an era in which Homo Erectus had still survived in then Homo Sapiens’ inhabited areas.

(A) in which Homo Erectus had still survived in then Homo Sapiens’ inhabited areas
(B) in which Homo Erectus still survived in areas inhabited by Homo Sapiens
(C) when Homo Erectus still survived where there were areas inhabited by Homo Sapiens
(D) when Homo Erectus had still survived in current Homo Sapiens areas
(E) when Homo Erectus still survived in areas that were then Homo Sapiens’



Solution


Credit: http://www.gmatfree.com/module-68/the-s ... lanation=1

Creating a filter: in this question, the construction "in which" may stand out. The answer choices show that "in which" and "when" are alternatives we must choose between. Both phrases, "in which" and "when," convey meaning accurately here. More of a problem is the phrase "in then Homo Sapiens' inhabited areas," an awkward string of words.

Applying the filter: (B) looks better and clear. Choice (C) has strange phrasing that leaves us uncertain whether the two groups are in the same area, as the sentence intends to say. Choice (D) has the same problem as (A). Choice (E) distorts the meaning of the sentence; the intended meaning isn't that any areas belonged to Homo Sapiens; we're talking about cohabitation. The correct answer is (B).
_________________
Most Comprehensive Article on How to Score a 700+ on the GMAT (NEW)
Verb Tenses Simplified


If you found my post useful, KUDOS are much appreciated. Giving Kudos is a great way to thank and motivate contributors, without costing you anything.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 15 Jul 2016
Posts: 92
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
CAT Tests
Re: Investigations along the Solo river in Indonesia have led some archeol  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2019, 21:24
had - present perfect tense is used when there are two related events in the past and the sequencing is not clear.

(A) in which Homo Erectus had still survived in then Homo Sapiens’ inhabited areas - Is there any other related event in the past for which we require had? No.
(B) in which Homo Erectus still survived in areas inhabited by Homo Sapiens - Looks good, lets keep it and move on to find a better answer if possible.
(C) when Homo Erectus still survived where there were areas inhabited by Homo Sapiens - "still survived"? We are talking about event that's over in the past.
(D) when Homo Erectus had still survived in current Homo Sapiens areas - again, incorrect usage of had.
(E) when Homo Erectus still survived in areas that were then Homo Sapiens’ - Still survived again incorrect, that were then Homo Sapiens' is also incorrect because out intended meaning is that areas were always inhabited by Homo Sapiens, not only then.

Hence, B wins.
_________________
Please give Kudos if you agree with my approach :)
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Investigations along the Solo river in Indonesia have led some archeol   [#permalink] 20 Jul 2019, 21:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Investigations along the Solo river in Indonesia have led some archeol

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne