Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the

Question

Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.

Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?

(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.
(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August.
(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.
(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.
(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.

walker · Answer

C

...since that time new and more stringent rules.... have been in effect. That  accounts for  the fact that  reports  of airplane mechanical problems  have increased  in frequency  by 50 percent  since last August.

Assumption: There was no other reason why the reports have increased since last August.

(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.

Sunny143 · Answer

C here as well.

If we negate the assumption in C, it means that mechanical problems have increased by 50% and this kills the argument since the argument is built on the premise that the new and stringent rules and regulations are responsible for the increaed reports nit the actual cases.

pmenon · Answer

C for me as well. Without C, you cannot safely reach the conclusion that the increase in reports is due to more stringent reporting requirements

Minheequang · Answer

Very interesting question
IMO  C

Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.

Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?

(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems -->  out of scope 
(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August -->  this is a weaken, not an assumption. Because this give an alternative for the increase of reports of mechanical problems since last August, besides the operation of rules for mechanical problems reporting 
(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August --> best answer. You can use the Assumption negative technique in Bible critical Power score:  Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased by 50 percent since last August --> this turns out to be a weaken to the argument, so this is the best choice 
(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were -->  this seems alright, but not as strong as (C). The reluctance is just a weak and abstract reason to decide whether to report a mechanical problem. But because the frequency increase dramatically, 50%, so the reluctance seems to play no significant role 
(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August -->  weaken

Minheequang · Answer

IMO  C

Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.
Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?
(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems -->  this is not about the result of increase mechanical reports, but about the cause of them 
(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August --> weaken. More mechanical problems-->more reports (not because of more rules) 
(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August --> negating this:  Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased by 50 percent since last August  -->weaken like (B). So, the best 
(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were --> weaken. Because airlines are now likely to report mechanical problems than they were before, this accounts for the fact that mechanical reports increase (not because of more rules) 
(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August --> another weaken. Analyzing like (B) & (D)

vannu · Answer

Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.
Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?
(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.
(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August.
(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.
(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.
(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.

Anwser: C
 It says "Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August."..The conclusion is the reports were increased by 50% which means already existing problems were reported rather than new problems.

trainspotting · Answer

Its C for me...If the reason is not human error then it should be mechanical problem...To make it true, the amount of mechanical problems today should not be much more than that present earlier...C brings it out clearly...

shalva · Answer

C

In short the arguments says: We have more stringent rules for identifying problems  =>  problem reports increased by 50%.

But maybe the increase in reporting is not based on improved procedures? Maybe reason is the overall increase in number of problems?

Argument implies that the number of problems was the same and number of reports increased solely because of new rules. If this assumption does not hold then the argument is clearly faulty.

So for argument to be true the assumption (C) must hold.

gurpreetsingh · Answer

Its C only,

D states that now airline are more eager to report => increase in the reports is because of their eagerness not because of the rules.

sanathani · Answer

Ans is C  
Premise :50% increase in reporting airplane mechanical problems 
conc: Human failure not responsible 
Assp:Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August

satyaachanta · Answer

Can some one explain how can it be 'C' ? , I felt confused at 'if reports were increased by 50%, how can we conclude that those 50% reports doesn't constitute to 50% of mechanical problems ?'. Here I assume 50% mechanical problems as the problems that are newly raised. Thankyou

anupamadw · Answer

Hi 
I am not expert, but expert can comment on my reasoning

Because of stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems are in effect, reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased  in frequency  by 50 percent since last August.
Eg. before stringent rules mechanical problems reported were 50 , but actually there were 75 problems. So 25 were not reported.
After stringent rules, mechanical problems reported are 75 and in reality also 75 problems are there.
This means reports of airplane mechanical problems increased  in frequency  by 50 percent but actual problems have not increased. this is choice C which supports that only report frequency has increased , not actual problems count are same.

This assumption is needed because author specifically says --- more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical probbeen ilems have n effect. That accounts for the fact that reports ----- 
If actual problems itself are increasing then we cant attribute increase in reporting to stringent rules.
We have to show, problems are all same only more stringent rules have helped to identify the problem.

09173140521 · Answer

GMATNinja  
could you explain this Q ?

VerbalBot · Answer

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards