Is \(a > b\) ?


(1) \(ax > bx\)

(2) \(x*a^2 + x*b^2 < 0\)
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

(1) ax > bx
or ax - bx > 0 or x*(a-b) > 0.
So either both x > 0 and a > b OR both x < 0 and a < b. So we cant be sure if a > b only since we dont know about x.
Not sufficient.

(2) x*(a^2 + b^2) < 0
Here a^2 + b^2 cannot be negative, whether a/b are positive or negative doesnt matter. So the only possibility is that x < 0. So we know that x is negative but we cannot say anything about a & b.
Not sufficient.

Combining both the statements, x is negative so a < b. Then only ax can be greater than bx. So this is sufficient to give NO as an answer to the question.

Hence C answer.

Statement 1: ax>bx

Since it is an inequality and we don't the value of x, we cannot cancel x just like that. Instead, let's take all the variables on one side.
Thus, ax-bx>0
This implies that x(a-b)>0

Again, since its an inequality, we can either have x>0 and a>b (i.e. both elements are positive) or x<0 and a<b (i.e. both elements are negative). Since, we cannot conclusively say whether a<b or a>b, this statement is insufficient.

Statement 2: \(x*a^2 + x*b^2 < 0\)

This implies [m]x*(a^2 + b^2) < 0

Now, [m](a^2 + b^2) will be either 0 (if a=b=0) or positive. Sum of squares of two numbers can never be negative.

Thus, for statement 2 to be true, we will necessarily have x<0. However, this statement doesn't give us any knowledge of whether a<b or a>b. Thus, insufficient

Combining 1& 2, we definitely know that x<0. Thus, according to statement 1, a<b. This means that the question will be false and 1& 2 together are sufficient to answer the question.

Hence, answer is C
_________________

Hit Kudos if you like my answer!