Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 23:35 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 23:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
DFG5150
Joined: 06 May 2008
Last visit: 20 Feb 2011
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
66
 [40]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 19
Kudos: 66
 [40]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
35
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,367
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,367
Kudos: 778,140
 [19]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
fameatop
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Last visit: 09 Jun 2017
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
2,495
 [12]
Given Kudos: 275
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Harvard, Columbia, Stern, Booth, LSB,
Posts: 383
Kudos: 2,495
 [12]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Greenberg
Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Last visit: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Posts: 32
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 1

pqp = p
Dividing both sides in p
pq = 1

sufficient

Statement 2

qpq = q
Dividing both sides in q
qp = 1

sufficient

So the answer is (D)
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,985
 [4]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,985
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DFG5150
Is pq = 1?

(1) pqp = p

(2) qpq = q

It's certainly possible, using either or both statements, that p = q = pq = 1. It's also possible that p = q = pq = 0. So the answer is E.
User avatar
DFG5150
Joined: 06 May 2008
Last visit: 20 Feb 2011
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
66
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 19
Kudos: 66
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Greenberg
Statement 1

pqp = p
Dividing both sides in p
pq = 1

sufficient

Statement 2

qpq = q
Dividing both sides in q
qp = 1

sufficient

So the answer is (D)

Since we don't know whether p=0 or q=0, we can't divide the ecuations by these variables.
User avatar
Hades
Joined: 14 May 2009
Last visit: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
90
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Posts: 135
Kudos: 90
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Greenberg
Statement 1

pqp = p
Dividing both sides in p
pq = 1

sufficient

Statement 2

qpq = q
Dividing both sides in q
qp = 1

sufficient

So the answer is (D)

You forgot to consider whether p or q are 0, in which case you'd be dividing by 0 (which is undefined). If it's not stated that the variable can't be 0, move the variables to one side and factor.
User avatar
abilash10
Joined: 02 Feb 2013
Last visit: 25 Aug 2016
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V41
GPA: 3.2
WE:Programming (Computer Software)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yes but if (1) gives us PQ= 1 as a possible conclusion, and so does (2), then cant we conclude that PQ=1 ?
User avatar
fameatop
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Last visit: 09 Jun 2017
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 275
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Harvard, Columbia, Stern, Booth, LSB,
Posts: 383
Kudos: 2,495
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abilash10
yes but if (1) gives us PQ= 1 as a possible conclusion, and so does (2), then cant we conclude that PQ=1 ?

That's not correct always and for the same reason i combined both the statements.
avatar
warabull
Joined: 31 Mar 2013
Last visit: 23 Nov 2013
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 3
GMAT Date: 10-23-2013
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fameatop
abilash10
yes but if (1) gives us PQ= 1 as a possible conclusion, and so does (2), then cant we conclude that PQ=1 ?

That's not correct always and for the same reason i combined both the statements.

Hey can you please explain when to combine the statements and when not to ?
I was under the impression that for such questions, one needs to look at the common solution from both the qquestions to arrive at the answer.
If you could explain when to use these two approaches, it would help.

Thanks !
User avatar
suk1234
Joined: 29 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jul 2016
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 48
Posts: 37
Kudos: 185
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DFG5150
Is pq = 1?

(1) pqp = p

(2) qpq = q

This is how I approached the question; if anyone can kindly point out my flaw.
The question is asking pq=1

or p=1/q or q=1/p

Meaning are p and q reciprocal?. Yes/No

Statement 1
pqp=p
p^2q=p
q=p/p^2
q=1/p so Sufficient

Statement 2

qpq=q
q^2p=q
p=q/q^2
p=1/q so Sufficient

Therefore the answer is C
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,367
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,367
Kudos: 778,140
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
suk1234
DFG5150
Is pq = 1?

(1) pqp = p

(2) qpq = q

This is how I approached the question; if anyone can kindly point out my flaw.
The question is asking pq=1

or p=1/q or q=1/p

Meaning are p and q reciprocal?. Yes/No

Statement 1
pqp=p
p^2q=p
q=p/p^2
q=1/p so Sufficient

Statement 2

qpq=q
q^2p=q
p=q/q^2
p=1/q so Sufficient

Therefore the answer is C

If you say that each statement is sufficient, then you mean that the answer should be D, not C, right?

Now, the problem in your solution is that you cannot reduce pqp=p by p to get pq=1. This is because p can be zero and division be zero is not allowed.

Never reduce equation by variable (or expression with variable), if you are not certain that variable (or expression with variable) doesn't equal to zero. We can not divide by zero.

So when you divide by p you assume, with no ground for it, that p does not equal to zero thus exclude a possible solution. Notice that p=0 and pq=1 both satisfy pqp=p.

The same logic applies to the second statement.

Hope it helps.
User avatar
suk1234
Joined: 29 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jul 2016
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 48
Posts: 37
Kudos: 185
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
suk1234
DFG5150
Is pq = 1?

(1) pqp = p

(2) qpq = q

This is how I approached the question; if anyone can kindly point out my flaw.
The question is asking pq=1

or p=1/q or q=1/p

Meaning are p and q reciprocal?. Yes/No

Statement 1
pqp=p
p^2q=p
q=p/p^2
q=1/p so Sufficient

Statement 2

qpq=q
q^2p=q
p=q/q^2
p=1/q so Sufficient

Therefore the answer is C

If you say that each statement is sufficient, then you mean that the answer should be D, not C, right?

Now, the problem in your solution is that you cannot reduce pqp=p by p to get pq=1. This is because p can be zero and division be zero is not allowed.

Never reduce equation by variable (or expression with variable), if you are not certain that variable (or expression with variable) doesn't equal to zero. We can not divide by zero.

So when you divide by p you assume, with no ground for it, that p does not equal to zero thus exclude a possible solution. Notice that p=0 and pq=1 both satisfy pqp=p.

The same logic applies to the second statement.

Hope it helps.

Never reduce equation by variable (or expression with variable), if you are not certain that variable (or expression with variable) doesn't equal to zero. We can not divide by zero.


Yeaps! got it now. Thanks for the reply, it's very helpful. And thanks for that important bit of information. :thumbup:
User avatar
Qoofi
Joined: 18 Dec 2012
Last visit: 23 Feb 2024
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 530 Q37 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V32
GPA: 3.32
WE:Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V32
Posts: 64
Kudos: 191
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel


Never reduce equation by variable (or expression with variable), if you are not certain that variable (or expression with variable) doesn't equal to zero. We can not divide by zero.


This is a very important rule. Thanks bunnel.
User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 885
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 885
Kudos: 1,801
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DFG5150
Is pq = 1?

(1) pqp = p

(2) qpq = q
\(pq\,\,\mathop = \limits^? \,\,1\)

Let´s go straight to bifurcate (1+2), to guarantee the right answer is (E), indeed.

\(\left( {1 + 2} \right)\,\,\,\,\left\{ \matrix{\\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {p,q} \right) = \left( {1,1} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr \\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {p,q} \right) = \left( {0,0} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr} \right.\)


This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.
User avatar
Bixy34
Joined: 22 Apr 2025
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 80
Posts: 27
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Unable to understand how after combining p=0, q=0 is a valid case? Are we not supposed to take just the common solution which in this case is pq=1?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,367
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,367
Kudos: 778,140
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bixy34
Unable to understand how after combining p=0, q=0 is a valid case? Are we not supposed to take just the common solution which in this case is pq=1?
p=0 and q=0 satisfy both statements: p=0 makes (1) true, q=0 makes (2) true, and together they still satisfy both. In that case, pq=0, not 1. So pq is not uniquely determined, and the answer is E.

Please review the solution here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/is-pq-1-1-pq ... l#p1272924

Also, pure algebraic questions are no longer a part of the DS syllabus of the GMAT.

DS questions in GMAT Focus encompass various types of word problems, such as:

  • Word Problems
  • Work Problems
  • Distance Problems
  • Mixture Problems
  • Percent and Interest Problems
  • Overlapping Sets Problems
  • Statistics Problems
  • Combination and Probability Problems

While these questions may involve or necessitate knowledge of algebra, arithmetic, inequalities, etc., they will always be presented in the form of word problems. You won’t encounter pure "algebra" questions like, "Is x > y?" or "A positive integer n has two prime factors..."

Check GMAT Syllabus for Focus Edition

You can also visit the Data Sufficiency forum and filter questions by OG 2024-2025, GMAT Prep (Focus), and Data Insights Review 2024-2025 sources to see the types of questions currently tested on the GMAT.

So, you can ignore this question.

Hope it helps.­
Moderators:
Math Expert
105368 posts
496 posts