GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 22 Jan 2020, 00:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Is q > t ?

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 60561
Is q > t ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2014, 05:41
4
3
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (01:06) correct 28% (01:17) wrong based on 191 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Tough and Tricky questions: Inequalities.

Is q > t ?

(1) qp^2 < tp^2

(2) qp^3 > tp^3

Kudos for a correct solution.

_________________
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2014
Posts: 60
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V35
Re: Is q > t ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2014, 07:10
3
IMO A.

ST 1 p^2 (q-t) < 0, p^2 must be +ve so q-t<0, so q<t....Sufficent

ST 2 p^3(q-t) < 0, but if p^3 is negative q-t is +ve, and vice versa. Insufficient.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 425
Re: Is q > t ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2014, 05:00
3
1
As per Statement 1.
qp^2 < tp^2
Get terms on one side
qp^2 - tp^2 < 0
p^2 ( q-t) < 0
If multiplication of two terms is zero then both terms should have opposite signs.
p^2 will always be +ve .
So q-t < 0
q<t Sufficient

As per Statement 2 qp^3 > tp^3
P^3 (q-t) > 0

If mulitplication of two terms are positive then both terms either will be +ve or -ve
P^3 can be +ve or -ve. So q>t or q<t.
Statement 2 is insufficient

Answer: A

Regards,
Ammu
Manager
Status: Manager to Damager!
Affiliations: MBA
Joined: 22 May 2014
Posts: 55
Location: United States
Schools: Insead July'17
Is q > t ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2015, 18:24
I think the assumption that p^2 is positive is wrong..

p^2 can also be negative... The question stem doesn't say anything about p.
How can you take it for granted that p^2 is positive?

Dear Bunuel,
Could you please clarify~
Intern
Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Posts: 10
Re: Is q > t ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2015, 19:48
p^2 can also be negative...

navneetb --> p can be negative only if, p is a complex number, and even though inquestion it has not been specified whether p is real or imaginary. However, I think in gmat they always mean real number.
Manager
Status: Manager to Damager!
Affiliations: MBA
Joined: 22 May 2014
Posts: 55
Location: United States
Schools: Insead July'17
Re: Is q > t ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2015, 03:50
tusharacc wrote:
p^2 can also be negative...

navneetb --> p can be negative only if, p is a complex number, and even though inquestion it has not been specified whether p is real or imaginary. However, I think in gmat they always mean real number.

Thanks for the reply..

I agree that GMAT doesn't deal with imaginary numbers. I presume it is true when it comes to real calculations...
Somehow in case inequalities, according to my experience, I believe GMAT does allow squared numbers to be taken as negative.

I am not sure 100% though.

It will be great if some expert chips in here to confirm....
Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2014
Posts: 1
Is q > t ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 08 Apr 2015, 06:31
1
This has to be 'A' .

Is q> t ?

Statement 1 : (1) qp^2 < tp^2

=> qp^2 - tp^2 <0
p^2 ( q -t ) < 0

Now , p^2 can never be negative ( GMAT does not deal with complex numbers ) , therefore, to satisfy the above equation ,

(q-t) has to be negative , i.e (q-t) < 0 ,

Therefore , q<t

a confirmed NO . Therefore sufficient statement .

Statement 2 : qp^3 > tp^3

qp^3 -tp^3 > 0
p^3 (q - t ) > 0

Now the above equation will hold when , p^3 and (q-t) are of same signs .

So if p is positive , then p^3 is positive , therefore (q-t) is positive , therefore q>t . ----> Yes ( q>t)

But if p is negative , then p^3 is negative , therefore (q-t) is negative , therefore q<t . -----> NO ( q <t )

Conflicting answers ( both yes and no ) , so the statement is not sufficient .

Therefore the answer is "A".

Originally posted by Ruchika2302 on 08 Apr 2015, 04:07.
Last edited by Ruchika2302 on 08 Apr 2015, 06:31, edited 1 time in total.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 60561
Re: Is q > t ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2015, 04:09
1
1
navneetb wrote:
I think the assumption that p^2 is positive is wrong..

p^2 can also be negative... The question stem doesn't say anything about p.
How can you take it for granted that p^2 is positive?

Dear Bunuel,
Could you please clarify~

On the GMAT the square of a number cannot be negative. It can be 0 or positive.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 104
Re: Is q > t ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2015, 18:48
Is q > t ?

(1) qp^2 < tp^2
qp^2 < tp^2 => P is not 0 and q < t => Sufficient
(2) qp^3 > tp^3
qp^3 > tp^3 => p is not 0 and we have 2 cases

- Case1: p>0 => q>t
- Case2: p<0 => q<t
=> Insufficient

=> Chose A
Manager
Joined: 11 Oct 2013
Posts: 97
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q41 V31
Re: Is q > t ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2015, 03:02
Bunuel wrote:

Tough and Tricky questions: Inequalities.

Is q > t ?

(1) qp^2 < tp^2

(2) qp^3 > tp^3

Kudos for a correct solution.

Since this is an inequality, terms common(which could otherwise be cancelled, if non-zero) on both sides of the inequality cannot be 0 and hence can be cancelled.
1) qp^2 < tp^2 will always be q < p, because p^2 can never be negative, and in this case never be 0 as well (reason mentioned above). This answers the question. Sufficient!
2) qp^3 > tp^3. In this case, although p can never be 0, p^3 can definitely be both positive and negative. Thus the sign will flip. Insufficient!

Answer A
_________________
Its not over..
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 8437
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Re: Is q > t ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2015, 04:14
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

Is q > t ?

(1) qp^2 < tp^2

(2) qp^3 > tp^3

-> In inequality, it is important to ignore square. That is, when it comes to multiplication in the other equation with 0, you need to ignore square. Thus, the question above is q > t ?.

In (1) qp^2-tp^2<0, (q-t)p^2<0, as q-t<0(p^2 is always positive number, even if you divide the both equations, the direction of the inequality sign is not changed. As q<t, it is (2) qp^3 > tp^3, (q-t)p^3>0, (q-t)p>0. So, the answer is A. In 1), it becomes no and is sufficient. Therefore, the answer is A.

-> For cases where we need 3 more equations, such as original conditions with “3 variables”, or “4 variables and 1 equation”, or “5 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 80% chance that E is the answer (especially about 90% of 2 by 2 questions where there are more than 3 variables), while C has 15% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since E is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or D.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
"Only \$79 for 1 month Online Course"
"Free Resources-30 day online access & Diagnostic Test"
"Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself"
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13993
Re: Is q > t ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2019, 22:35
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: Is q > t ?   [#permalink] 12 Apr 2019, 22:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Is q > t ?

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne