Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 21

Is rst = 1 ? [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Feb 2010, 12:43
1
This post received KUDOS
18
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
66% (01:53) correct
34% (00:46) wrong based on 1234 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Is rst = 1 ? (1) rs = 1 (2) st = 1
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Last edited by Bunuel on 07 Dec 2012, 09:01, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.



Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 445
Location: United States (MA)

Re: GMAT Paper test  Test Code 14 [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Feb 2010, 12:56
Answer: "E" : Both statements not sufficient
Reason: (plugging in method)
Statement 1: Say r = 1/3 and s = 3
satisfies statement 1 i.e. rs = 1 but cant comment about value of rst as t is still unknown.
Statement 2: Say t = 1/3 and s = 3
satisfies statement 1 i.e. st = 1 but cant comment about value of rst as t is still unknown.
Now if both statements are taken together, r=1/3 s=3 and t=1/3 => rst not equal to 1.
hence both the statements are not sufficient.



Intern
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 21

Re: GMAT Paper test  Test Code 14 [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Feb 2010, 13:21
piyatiwari wrote: Answer: "E" : Both statements not sufficient
Now if both statements are taken together, r=1/3 s=3 and t=1/3 => rst not equal to 1.
hence both the statements are not sufficient. But from your response above combining the two statements tells us conclusively that rst not eqaul to 1. Therefore combining the two statements is sufficient to answer the question as a 'NO'. So shouldn't the answer be 'C'



Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 445
Location: United States (MA)

Re: GMAT Paper test  Test Code 14 [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Feb 2010, 13:51
loki wrote: piyatiwari wrote: Answer: "E" : Both statements not sufficient
Now if both statements are taken together, r=1/3 s=3 and t=1/3 => rst not equal to 1.
hence both the statements are not sufficient. But from your response above combining the two statements tells us conclusively that rst not eqaul to 1. Therefore combining the two statements is sufficient to answer the question as a 'NO'. So shouldn't the answer be 'C' Oh yes. My usual mistake . Thanks so much Loki. This goes directly to my error log. So the answer is "C"



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39608

Re: GMAT Paper test  Test Code 14 [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Feb 2010, 13:56
5
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
4
This post was BOOKMARKED



Intern
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 21

Re: GMAT Paper test  Test Code 14 [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Feb 2010, 14:04
Bunuel wrote: loki wrote: piyatiwari wrote: Answer: "E" : Both statements not sufficient
Now if both statements are taken together, r=1/3 s=3 and t=1/3 => rst not equal to 1.
hence both the statements are not sufficient. But from your response above combining the two statements tells us conclusively that rst not eqaul to 1. Therefore combining the two statements is sufficient to answer the question as a 'NO'. So shouldn't the answer be 'C' Try r=s=t=1, both statement hold true and rst=1. Try r=s=t=1, both statement hold true and rst=1. Two different answers. Not sufficient. Answer: E. OA is E. I get it now! Thank you!



Manager
Joined: 09 Dec 2009
Posts: 122

OG DS 95, explain how my logic is wrong [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Feb 2010, 11:19
Ok, without a doubt my number property skills are my achillies heel when is comes to GMAT quant. I was reviewing my error log today. Tell me why my logic is wrong. 95. Is rst=1 (1) rs=1 (2) st=1 I attacked it by rearranging the original equations, dividing both sides by t. so, rs=1/t then sub in rs=1 so, 1=1/t then cross multiply t=1 Combined with what we already know (rs=1) we have 1*1=1 Therefore, sufficient. Same logic can be applied to statment 2. Therefore my answer was D. OA is actually E and I understand how they got it, but I also fail to see why my strategy was wrong. I feel like I'm probably overlooking some basic rule that governs all equations here but if someone could help me out that'd be great. Thanks
_________________
G.T.L.  GMAT, Tanning, Laundry
Round 1: 05/12/10 http://gmatclub.com/forum/handlingagrenadethesituationsofficialdebrief94181.html
Round 2: 07/10/10  This time it's personal.



Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 359

Re: OG DS 95, explain how my logic is wrong [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Feb 2010, 11:34
5
This post received KUDOS
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
Currency wrote: Ok, without a doubt my number property skills are my achillies heel when is comes to GMAT quant. I was reviewing my error log today. Tell me why my logic is wrong. 95. Is rst=1 (1) rs=1 (2) st=1 I attacked it by rearranging the original equations, dividing both sides by t. so, rs=1/tthen sub in rs=1 so, 1=1/t then cross multiply t=1 Combined with what we already know (rs=1) we have 1*1=1 Therefore, sufficient. Same logic can be applied to statment 2. Therefore my answer was D. OA is actually E and I understand how they got it, but I also fail to see why my strategy was wrong. I feel like I'm probably overlooking some basic rule that governs all equations here but if someone could help me out that'd be great. Thanks The highlighted part is the mistake. The question is asking u to prove that... and you are considering the same as True. This isnt the correct approach. The Answer E is correct... Is rst = 1? S1: rs = 1, t can be 2 ... then rst is not equal to 1... t can be 1... then rst is equal to 1... Hence IN SUFF S2: st =1 , r can be 2 ... then rst is not equal to 1.. r can be 1 .. then rst is equal to 1... Hence IN SUFF... combining I and 2... we can have .. r = 2, s = 1/2, t = 2 Then rst = 2 but we can also have r = 1, s = 1, t =1 Then rst = 1.. Hence E... Hope this helps!
_________________
Cheers! JT........... If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!!
Do not post questions with OAPlease underline your SC questions while postingTry posting the explanation along with your answer choice For CR refer Powerscore CR BibleFor SC refer Manhattan SC Guide
~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~



Director
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 542
WE 1: Investment Banking  6yrs

Re: OG DS 95, explain how my logic is wrong [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Feb 2010, 11:36
Currency wrote: Ok, without a doubt my number property skills are my achillies heel when is comes to GMAT quant. I was reviewing my error log today. Tell me why my logic is wrong. 95. Is rst=1 (1) rs=1 (2) st=1 I attacked it by rearranging the original equations, dividing both sides by t. so, rs=1/t then sub in rs=1 so, 1=1/t then cross multiply t=1 Combined with what we already know (rs=1) we have 1*1=1 Therefore, sufficient. Same logic can be applied to statment 2. Therefore my answer was D. OA is actually E and I understand how they got it, but I also fail to see why my strategy was wrong. I feel like I'm probably overlooking some basic rule that governs all equations here but if someone could help me out that'd be great. Thanks Okay, you can really deal with this much simpler. But, let's review what you've done. I attacked it by rearranging the original equations, dividing both sides by t. so, rs=1/t your question then changes to  Is rs=1/t? 1. Does this give the vale of t? No. Even if you use (1), you get  1=1/t > t=1. Does this answer your question. No. A/D out 2. Similarly, does the value of st=1, help us in answering the question? No. B out Hope this helps.



Manager
Joined: 09 Dec 2009
Posts: 122

Re: OG DS 95, explain how my logic is wrong [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Feb 2010, 11:41
Quote: "The question is asking u to prove that... and you are considering the same as True. This isnt the correct approach." This is what I was missing. Normally I'd instinctively follow that, but I think cause it was in my error log I overthought it and got fancy  effectively confusing myself. Ha! Thanks for the quick repsonses guys, much appreciated!
_________________
G.T.L.  GMAT, Tanning, Laundry
Round 1: 05/12/10 http://gmatclub.com/forum/handlingagrenadethesituationsofficialdebrief94181.html
Round 2: 07/10/10  This time it's personal.



Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 164

Re: OG DS 95, explain how my logic is wrong [#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Feb 2010, 06:32
i) rs=1 r=1/3 s=3 and t=7 so ans is no r=1/3 s=3 and t=1 so ans is yes not suff.
ii) st=1 s=1/3 and t=3 and r=7 so ans is no r=1/3 s=3 and t=1 so ans is yes
not sufficient
combining both 1 and 2
s=1/3 r=3 and t=3 still it satisfies both eq but rst is not 1
if s=1 r=1 and t=1 it satisifies both eq. and rst is 1
so ans is E



Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2011
Posts: 171

Re: Is rst=1? Statement 1: rs=1 Statement 2: st=1 [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Nov 2011, 12:31
i) rs=1 As we don't know anything about value of t so we cant answer if rst = 1. Insufficient.
ii) st=1 As we don't know anything about value of r so we cant answer if rst = 1. Insufficient.
Combining both 1 and 2
(rs)(st) = 1 (rst)s = 1 rst = 1/s
As we don't know the value of s. rst can be anything (1 or something else). we cannot answer "Is rst = 1?"
Insufficient Ans: E



Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Posts: 3

Re: Is rst = 1 ? [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2012, 12:27
Its clear that 1 and 2 do not lead to a solution. then, Cant this be solved by observing that we have 2 equations and 3 unknown variables. hence not sufficient and hence E?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39608

Re: Is rst = 1 ? [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Dec 2012, 07:34



Manager
Joined: 18 Oct 2011
Posts: 90
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GMAT Date: 01302013
GPA: 3.3

Re: Is rst = 1 ? [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jan 2013, 15:21
statement 1: don't know anything about t. not sufficient statement 2: don't know anything about r. not sufficient
put them together: rst could equal (1)(1)(1) in which case would be 1. or rst could equal (1/2)(2)(1/2) in which case rst = 1/2. Not sufficient
Answer: E



GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 15926

Re: Is rst = 1 ? [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Apr 2014, 08:43
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books  GMAT Club Tests  Best Prices on GMAT Courses  GMAT Mobile App  Math Resources  Verbal Resources



Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2015
Posts: 127

Re: Is rst = 1 ? [#permalink]
Show Tags
04 May 2015, 04:56
2
This post received KUDOS
I found that the easiest way to tackle this problem was as following:
(A) rs = 1 means r and s have same sign. Make a chart:
r s + +  
Clearly not sufficient
(B)
st = 1 means s and t have same sign. Make a chart:
s t + +  
Clearly not sufficient
combined:
r s t + + +   
two different solutions: 1 or 1, hence (E)
Incredibly fast solution, took less than 15 seconds



eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 726

Is rst = 1 ? [#permalink]
Show Tags
04 May 2015, 22:26
Going through the solutions posted by students in this thread, I realized that this question is a good illustration of the perils of 'solve by substituting numbers' approach. A student considered one set of possible values of r, s and t and thought that since he was able to get a tangible value of the product rst that was not equal to 1, this meant the 2 statements together were sufficient. It didn't occur to him at that time (later he did realize this oversight) that other values of r, s and t were also possible that did lead to rst = 1. To eliminate all this uncertainty about whether you've considered all possible sets of values for the different unknowns, I would like to suggest the algebraic way of thinking through this question. Here's how I would solve it: The question asks if rst = 1 (Note to self: it's not mentioned that r, s and t are integers. So, they might very well be fractions)
1. rs = 1 But t = ? Don't know
Insufficient
2. st = 1 But r = ? Don't know
Insufficient.
1 + 2
The question asks about the product rst. This product can be written as \(\frac{(rs)(st)}{s}\). Substituting the values of rs and st from St. 1 and 2, we get:
rst = \(\frac{(1)(1)}{s}\) = \(\frac{1}{s}\)
But s = ? Don't know
If s = 1, rst = 1 But if s = some other value, rst is not equal to 1.
So, clearly insufficient.
Answer: Option EI hope this alternate solution was helpful for you Best Regards Japinder
_________________
 '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub  70 point improvement guarantee  www.egmat.com



Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 3
Location: United States
WE: Analyst (Consumer Products)

Re: Is rst = 1 ? [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Aug 2015, 16:18
1.) Tells us nothing about t  INS (eliminate A/D from grid) 2.) Tells us nothing about r  INS (eliminate B from grid)
Combined (left with C or E) r*s = 1 s*t = 1
a.) 1*1*1 = 1 True b.) 1/4 * 4 * 1/4 = 1 False
Therefore answer is E



Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 123
Concentration: International Business
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31 GMAT 2: 580 Q39 V31 GMAT 3: 630 Q41 V35
GPA: 4

Is rst = 1? [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 May 2016, 09:31
Is rst = 1?
(1) rs = 1 (2) st = 1
Can someone please explain this question to me?
Source: GMAC Paper test. Test code 14
Unfortunately the paper tests don't provide answer explanations.







Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 23 posts ]




