Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 21:32 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 21:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
sm176811
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Last visit: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 1,038
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,038
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mba2gb
Joined: 27 Sep 2005
Last visit: 11 May 2007
Posts: 22
Products:
Posts: 22
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sm176811
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Last visit: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 1,038
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,038
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
mohighmin
Joined: 01 Sep 2005
Last visit: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 13
Posts: 13
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,
I wrote the test two weeks back and I found it tougher.
The verbal was the of the same standard as of ETS. But the quant was definitely tougher. More inequalities, geometry, number properties.

I thought i screwed the quant, must have answered many wrong. But i got a 50 in quants.
I think i reached the tougher questions very early.
But better prepare well for quants.


Mohighmin
User avatar
sm176811
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Last visit: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 1,038
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,038
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank You
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,291
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The word on the street is that the Pearson Quant section is significantly more difficult. Apparently, too many test takers were scoring 50+ so they decided to "up the anty" even though this goes against the so called standardized nature of the exam.
User avatar
sm176811
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Last visit: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 1,038
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,038
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yeah thats funny notion thou..


How could you then compare the ppl who got X in the old GMAT to people who scored X in the new one when the standards are not the same?

The logic kind of beats me. Wonder whether GMAC has any published data!
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,291
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BTW John, your website has to be one of the best I`ve ever seen. Outstanding work! Just one question though, why no mention of or plans to travel to Japan?

Matt 8-)
User avatar
vivek123
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Last visit: 03 Jun 2012
Posts: 880
Own Kudos:
Posts: 880
Kudos: 1,128
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATT73
The word on the street is that the Pearson Quant section is significantly more difficult. Apparently, too many test takers were scoring 50+ so they decided to "up the anty" even though this goes against the so called standardized nature of the exam.


That's unfair :twisted:
People who wrote ETS GMAT would have higher Quant score, the comparison is not going to be fair :cry:
avatar
sunandan.ganguly
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Last visit: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 14
Posts: 14
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hell yeah .. john, ur website is amazing man !! Whats more interesting is ur connection with Calcutta. Are you a "bong" ? :lol:

sorry for digressing.
User avatar
sm176811
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Last visit: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 1,038
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,038
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Guess what? Yeah!! I was in Calcutta for 16 years.... went to Xavier's!!

u?
avatar
sunandan.ganguly
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Last visit: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 14
Posts: 14
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yeah am from st. patricks,asansol ... and then lawrence . :-D
User avatar
banerjeea_98
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Last visit: 17 May 2012
Posts: 674
Own Kudos:
Posts: 674
Kudos: 201
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vivek123
GMATT73
The word on the street is that the Pearson Quant section is significantly more difficult. Apparently, too many test takers were scoring 50+ so they decided to "up the anty" even though this goes against the so called standardized nature of the exam.

That's unfair :twisted:
People who wrote ETS GMAT would have higher Quant score, the comparison is not going to be fair :cry:


Tougher test doesn't necessarily correlate to lower scores. It is quite reasonable to assume that the test might be tougher now but scoring is more lenient. Just do ur best out there and let the software do the rest of the work. If u panic by seeing a tough question, u mite end up making mistakes even on the easier ones.
User avatar
sm176811
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Last visit: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 1,038
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,038
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Agreed!
User avatar
vivek123
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Last visit: 03 Jun 2012
Posts: 880
Own Kudos:
Posts: 880
Kudos: 1,128
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
banerjeea_98
vivek123
GMATT73
The word on the street is that the Pearson Quant section is significantly more difficult. Apparently, too many test takers were scoring 50+ so they decided to "up the anty" even though this goes against the so called standardized nature of the exam.

That's unfair :twisted:
People who wrote ETS GMAT would have higher Quant score, the comparison is not going to be fair :cry:

Tougher test doesn't necessarily correlate to lower scores. It is quite reasonable to assume that the test might be tougher now but scoring is more lenient. Just do ur best out there and let the software do the rest of the work. If u panic by seeing a tough question, u mite end up making mistakes even on the easier ones.


Yes, that's true!
User avatar
josh478
Joined: 01 Apr 2006
Last visit: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
Posts: 75
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
correct me if i'm wrong, but if it is tougher as you say, then the percentiles will change. meaning, a 95th % might be 700 versus 710 as the 95% for the old test. just a thought. These do change over time I believe if more people are scoring higher, the percentages will migrate up (or down) accordingly. So the score is less relevant than the percentile. However, I would image they want to keep the percentiles and scores pretty consistent over time.
avatar
sykofu
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Last visit: 08 Jul 2006
Posts: 3
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi guys, just did my GMAT for the first time yesterday and got 710. Turns out that the quant section was significantly harder than any ETS or OG stuff that I have been exposed to. The english section was not that hard but after doing the quant, it kind of rattled me a little that my performance in the verbal was not good at all hence the low score. Even though at the end of the day i got a 50 on the quant - i refrained from panicking in the section but during the break I let it get to me and hence it affected the verbal. I would say that the OG's mathematical questions are no longer revelant or even indicative of the types you will get on Pearsons. They are designed to trick you on almost every single question with multiple calculations required each. Finally no matter how badly you think you did in one section, just focus on the next section.
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,291
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sykofu
Hi guys, just did my GMAT for the first time yesterday and got 710. Turns out that the quant section was significantly harder than any ETS or OG stuff that I have been exposed to. The english section was not that hard but after doing the quant, it kind of rattled me a little that my performance in the verbal was not good at all hence the low score. Even though at the end of the day i got a 50 on the quant - i refrained from panicking in the section but during the break I let it get to me and hence it affected the verbal. I would say that the OG's mathematical questions are no longer revelant or even indicative of the types you will get on Pearsons. They are designed to trick you on almost every single question with multiple calculations required each. Finally no matter how badly you think you did in one section, just focus on the next section.


I can also confirm that a few coworkers of mine here in Japan have made it clear that their Quantitative scores have dropped significantly (Q44 ---> Q 35) due to a perceived higher level of difficulty. I guess only those who took the ETS version will be able to make an accurate comparison.
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,291
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is quoted directly from Veritas, a leading developer of GMAT specific preparation materials:

"So the competition has become stiffer, but does that mean the test itself will get harder? Although the subcontractor responsible for writing the test remains tight-lipped, it is evident that it already has and there are reasons to think it will continue to become harder. Because more students are doing better with the math topics, the GMAT is less accurate at the highest score levels where one or two missed questions correspond to huge differences in percentile score. The writers have already tried to remedy this by focusing far more on the harder probability and combinatorics problems. As average scores continue to rise the test may change even more to relieve the clustering of high scores."

Sure, one may read this as a simple marketing gimmick, but there must be some truth to the issue because I keep hearing the same sort of claims from test-taker after test-taker...
User avatar
sm176811
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Last visit: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 1,038
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,038
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thnks guys!!! this is good info
 1   2   
Moderator:
Founder
43163 posts