Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Ive started reading the WSJ on the advise of many high scorers
Heres a sentence that I encountered and would like to know if a propnoun error exists in the underlined portion. If not, please explain to me why this is correct.
"In Monday night's debate, Mr. Romney softened earlier attacks on China and the president's handling of uprisings in the Arab world, blurred differences on Afghanistan and highlighted their mutual support of continued drone strikes on suspected terrorists."
The pronoun "their" should refer to a plural noun and there seems to be no noun other than "Mr. Romney" who could've supported drone strikes.
Is this an error ? Should I continue reading these articles ?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Ive started reading the WSJ on the advise of many high scorers
Heres a sentence that I encountered and would like to know if a propnoun error exists in the underlined portion. If not, please explain to me why this is correct.
"In Monday night's debate, Mr. Romney softened earlier attacks on China and the president's handling of uprisings in the Arab world, blurred differences on Afghanistan and highlighted their mutual support of continued drone strikes on suspected terrorists."
The pronoun "their" should refer to a plural noun and there seems to be no noun other than "Mr. Romney" who could've supported drone strikes.
Is this an error ? Should I continue reading these articles ?
Show more
Does seem like an error. "Their" probably refers to Romney and the president. However, the president's is in the possessive form and hence is not a proper antecedent. On the whole, this does not seem like a sentence that is "gmatically" correct.
"Softened earlier attacks on China and the president's handling of uprisings" also sounds confusing. Maybe "softened his stance on" or something like that would make the sentence more clear. Otherwise, the sentence properly maintains parallelism among softened, blurred and hardened.
Ive started reading the WSJ on the advise of many high scorers
Heres a sentence that I encountered and would like to know if a propnoun error exists in the underlined portion. If not, please explain to me why this is correct.
"In Monday night's debate, Mr. Romney softened earlier attacks on China and the president's handling of uprisings in the Arab world, blurred differences on Afghanistan and highlighted their mutual support of continued drone strikes on suspected terrorists."
The pronoun "their" should refer to a plural noun and there seems to be no noun other than "Mr. Romney" who could've supported drone strikes.
Is this an error ? Should I continue reading these articles ?
Show more
The omitted subject : In Monday night's debate [between Mr. Romney and the president], .. their. This picture is clear with rest of the article.
"Their" refers to obama and romney. If the sentence were tested by itself, it would be grammatically ambiguous. However, in the context of the news article, the audience knows *clearly* what nouns it refers to. So there is no problem. On the GMAT exam, if you see a standalone sentence like this, then you'll have to question who the other noun is.
But as it's in the context of a larger article, you can ignore this point for the purpose of reading WSJ.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.