Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
This Labor Day, turn your hard work into real score gains. From 615→715 in 15 days to 705 in 30 days, our students prove what's possible with personalized, expert guidance. Save up to 25% on 1-on-1 tutoring.
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost.
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application...
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Now, why can't I just delete (x-y) from both sides? I mean divide (x-y) by (x-y). It doesnt matter if its positive or negative, RHS will still be 1. So I should get:
\(x+y > 1\)
The same idea with statement 2 and combining the statements gives:
\(x+y>1>x-y\)
However, in the official explanation, they get: \((x+y) > (x^2–y^2) > (x-y)\)
I still manage to get the correct answer. I just dont really get why my approach is wrong.
Let’s start by rewriting the equation on the left of both inequalities. x2–y2 is the difference of squares, so it can be expressed as (x+y)(x-y). Statement (1) thus says that (x+y)(x-y) > (x-y), so (x+y) > 1 if (x-y) is positive and (x+y) < 1 if (x-y) is negative; INSUFFICIENT. Statement (2) says that (x+y)(x-y) < (x+y), so we have the same issues; INSUFFICIENT. Together we can express the inequality as (x+y) > (x2–y2) > (x-y), but the statements remain INSUFFICIENT.
For example, if (x+y) = 5 and (x-y) = ½ then the inequality is true and the answer to the original question is “yes.” If (x+y) = ½ and (x-y) = -½, the inequality is true but the answer to the original question is “no.” (E).
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Now, why can't I just delete (x-y) from both sides? I mean divide (x-y) by (x-y). It doesnt matter if its positive or negative, RHS will still be 1. So I should get:
\(x+y > 1\)
The same idea with statement 2 and combining the statements gives:
\(x+y>1>x-y\)
However, in the official explanation, they get: \((x+y) > (x^2–y^2) > (x-y)\)
I still manage to get the correct answer. I just dont really get why my approach is wrong.
Let’s start by rewriting the equation on the left of both inequalities. x2–y2 is the difference of squares, so it can be expressed as (x+y)(x-y). Statement (1) thus says that (x+y)(x-y) > (x-y), so (x+y) > 1 if (x-y) is positive and (x+y) < 1 if (x-y) is negative; INSUFFICIENT. Statement (2) says that (x+y)(x-y) < (x+y), so we have the same issues; INSUFFICIENT. Together we can express the inequality as (x+y) > (x2–y2) > (x-y), but the statements remain INSUFFICIENT.
For example, if (x+y) = 5 and (x-y) = ½ then the inequality is true and the answer to the original question is “yes.” If (x+y) = ½ and (x-y) = -½, the inequality is true but the answer to the original question is “no.” (E).
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.