Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In this session, Susan Berishaj (Higher Education Consultant & Founder of Sia Admissions) will explain how business school adcom evaluate your candidacy based on your post MBA plans.
In this session, Scott Edinburgh, MBA Admissions Expert and Founder of Personal MBA Coach, will present case studies of real applicant profiles who got into HBS, Stanford, Wharton, and more.
Probablity is among the trickiest concepts that GMAT tests. In this session, top GMAT Quant instructor of Kaplan, Gene Suhir, will show us how to master probabilty questions.
GMAT tests your ability to think critically by presenting "tricky" arguments that require you to notice flaws or vulnerabilities in the construct. e-GMAT is conducting a free webinar in which you can learn the art to decode difficult CR questions.
For 7 days from March 8 to March 14, type Coupon Code "SUCCESS2 " at check out to get 20% off from the original price. This is your chance to score an excellent Q49-51 just like 70% of our students.
Exceptionally different Live Online Class for Math! The most competitive rate ($590) in the market (3 hours per week x 8 weeks). Achieve a score of 49-51 just like 70% of our students!
Unlimited access to all content, Easy 1 Button Cancel (no calls, no emails), 100s of expert led video coaching lessons, 1000s of interwoven questions, and more.
Target question:Is xm < ym? Another approach is to rephrase the target question.
Take the inequality and subtract ym from both sides to get: xm - ym < 0 Factor out the m to get m(x - y) < 0 In other words.... REPHRASED target question:Is m(x - y) a NEGATIVE value?
Statement 1: x > y Subtract y from both sides to get: x - y > 0 So, x - y is a POSITIVE value Does this provide enough information to determine whether or not m(x - y) a NEGATIVE value? No. We still don't know anything about the value of m Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: m < 0 In other words, m is NEGATIVE Does this provide enough information to determine whether or not m(x - y) a NEGATIVE value? No. We don't know anything about the value of (x - y) Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statements 1 and 2 combined Statement 1 tells us that x - y is a POSITIVE value Statement 2 tells us that m is a NEGATIVE value So, m(x - y) = (NEGATIVE)(POSITIVE) = some NEGATIVE VALUE In other words, m(x - y) is definitely a NEGATIVE value Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT
Using both statements, if we take the inequality in Statement 1:
x > y
and multiply by m on both sides, we need to reverse the inequality, because, as Statement 2 tells us, m < 0. So we get
xm < ym
which is what we wanted. Statement 1 is not sufficient alone because we need to know if m is positive or negative, and Statement 2 is not sufficient alone since we have no information about x or y. So the answer is C. _________________
GMAT Tutor in Montreal
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
Target question:Is xm < ym? Another approach is to rephrase the target question.
Take the inequality and subtract ym from both sides to get: xm - ym < 0 Factor out the m to get m(x - y) < 0 In other words.... REPHRASED target question:Is m(x - y) a NEGATIVE value?
Statement 1: x > y Subtract y from both sides to get: x - y > 0 So, x - y is a POSITIVE value Does this provide enough information to determine whether or not m(x - y) a NEGATIVE value? No. We still don't know anything about the value of m Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: m < 0 In other words, m is NEGATIVE Does this provide enough information to determine whether or not m(x - y) a NEGATIVE value? No. We don't know anything about the value of (x - y) Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statements 1 and 2 combined Statement 1 tells us that x - y is a POSITIVE value Statement 2 tells us that m is a NEGATIVE value So, m(x - y) = (NEGATIVE)(POSITIVE) = some NEGATIVE VALUE In other words, m(x - y) is definitely a NEGATIVE value Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT
In this case, we can subtract ym from both sides even though we don't know their signs?
We are concerned about the sign of a variable when multiplying/dividing an inequality by it. However we can safely add/subtract a variable from both sides of an inequality regardless of its sign.
In this case, we can subtract ym from both sides even though we don't know their signs?
When it comes to solving inequalities, we can safely add or subtract ANY value from both sides, and the resulting inequality will be perfectly valid. However, if we multiply or divide both sides by a NEGATIVE value, then we must REVERSE the direction of the inequality symbol.
Evaluate this properly: m(x-y)<0 This means the product of m and (x - y) is negative. So, either m is positive and (x - y) negative OR m is negative and (x - y) positive. The two statements together tell us hat (x - y) is positive and m is positive.
So we know for sure that m(x-y) is positive. Sufficient. _________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
1) Given: x > y, now if m is positive, multiplying both sides with m will not change the sign, thus xm > ym but if m is negative, multiplying both sides with m will change the sign, thus xm < ym
so both cases are possible depending on the value of m. NOT SUFFICIENT.
2) Given: m <0, clearly NOT SUFFICIENT as not information about x and y is given.
Combining 1) and 2) from two we know that m<0, hence out of the two cases in option 1, only this 'xm < ym' remain true. so BOTH STATEMENTS COMBINED ARE SUFFICIENT.
Hello! Could someone please help me understand where my logic is flawed? My initial answer was E Where does the assumption that x and y are positive come from? If x is -2 and y is -3, they still satisfy (1) x>y equation. Is x,y are positive e.g. x = 3 and y = 2, they also satisfy (1) x>y. From (2) we know that m<0, so m could be -1. So how can we tell for sure if xm<ym if x,y can be both positive and negative?
Hello! Could someone please help me understand where my logic is flawed? My initial answer was E Where does the assumption that x and y are positive come from? If x is -2 and y is -3, they still satisfy (1) x>y equation. Is x,y are positive e.g. x = 3 and y = 2, they also satisfy (1) x>y. From (2) we know that m<0, so m could be -1. So how can we tell for sure if xm<ym if x,y can be both positive and negative?
We certainly cannot assume x and y are positive here, so if any post above did that, that solution was not correct.
But if you look at your two examples:
• if x = 3, y = 2, and m = -1, then xm = -3, and ym = -2, so xm < ym, and the answer to the question is "yes" • if x = -2, y = -3, and m = -1, then xm = 2 and ym = 3, so xm < ym, and the answer to the question is again "yes"
and you'll continue to find the answer to the question is "yes" for any valid examples you try, using both Statements. You can also prove the answer must be C here conceptually, as I did earlier in the thread. _________________
GMAT Tutor in Montreal
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
One of the fastest-growing graduate business schools in Southern California, shaping the future by developing leading thinkers who will stand at the forefront of business growth. MBA Landing | School of Business (ucr.edu)