Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2310:00 AM EDT
-10:30 AM EDT
Admissions committees evaluate the GMAT/GRE in context — your background, your representation in the applicant pool, the strength of everything else in your file. The same score works for one candidate and falls short for another with identical numbers.
Apr 2312:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
Inquire for a free profile evaluation and guarantee statement for possible admits and scholarships!
Apr 2408:30 PM IST
-09:30 PM IST
Join us for a Live Coffee chat with Jenifer Turtschanow where we talk about enhancing your MBA profile and fixing gaps in just 4 months.
09 Jul 2024, 04:51
Kudos
Bookmarks
ROI might be a bit low but youll have satisfaction of coming out of reputed business school in league of IIM A,B,C. If your work ex is <=3 go for CAT in India with full vigor.
09 Jul 2024, 05:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
This is quite a loaded question. If we look at FT Rankings, the indicator value for money is perhaps the closest to RoI.
Obviously numerous indicators (each with a different weightate) go into overall final allocation of rankings by FT.
Surprisingly, "Wharton", overall ranked #1 by FT Rankings, ranks #95 in the world, in terms of value for money. So, this tells me that value for money is not weighted very highly by FT, when arrving at the overall rankings (else Wharton would not have achieved overall rank #1, despite faring so poorly on value for money).
"University of Georgia: Terry", overall ranked #40 by FT Rankings, ranks #1 in the world, in terms of value for money.
ISB ranks #55, in terms of value for money. Incidentally, ISB ranks #1 in FT rankings, on the indicator "Salary increase".
Obviously numerous indicators (each with a different weightate) go into overall final allocation of rankings by FT.
Surprisingly, "Wharton", overall ranked #1 by FT Rankings, ranks #95 in the world, in terms of value for money. So, this tells me that value for money is not weighted very highly by FT, when arrving at the overall rankings (else Wharton would not have achieved overall rank #1, despite faring so poorly on value for money).
"University of Georgia: Terry", overall ranked #40 by FT Rankings, ranks #1 in the world, in terms of value for money.
ISB ranks #55, in terms of value for money. Incidentally, ISB ranks #1 in FT rankings, on the indicator "Salary increase".
IVYCRACKERS.COM
Joined: 04 Jun 2012
Last visit: 19 Jan 2025
Posts: 265
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: IIMB'17 (A$$) ISB '17 (A$$) IIMA (A)
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.1
WE:Project Management (Energy)
11 Jul 2024, 01:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
Yash_Chatterjee
Hi! It all depends on yardstick you use for measuring ROI. If you look at top global B-Schools (in US), then their employment rate is 95%+ within 3 months of graduation with a median salary of $175K~$230K (depending on the school) against tuition+expenses of $200K (approx). Now if you look at ISB, the employment rate is 99% within 3 months of graduation and the median salary is INR 32 Lakhs against a tuition+expenses of INR 50 Lakhs (approx). So, definitely the top global B-schools will have a better ROI.
