sonaketu wrote:
It has been claimed that an action is morally good only if it benefits another person and was performed with that intention; whereas an action that harms another person is morally bad either if such harm was intended or if reasonable forethought would have shown that the action was likely to cause harm.
Which one of the following judgments most closely confirms to the principle cited above?
(A) Pamela wrote a letter attempting to cause trouble between Edward and his friends; this action of Pamela's was morally bad, even though the letter, in fact, had an effect directly opposite from the one intended.
(B) In order to secure a promotion, Jeffery devoted his own time to resolving a backlog of medical benefits claims; Jeffrey's action was morally good since it alone enabled Sara's claim to be processed in time for her to receive much-needed treatment.
(C) Intending to help her elderly neighbor by clearing his walkway after a snowstorm, Teresa inadvertently left ice on his steps; because of this exposed ice, her neighbor had a bad fall, thus showing that morally good actions can have bad consequences.
(D) Marilees, asked by a homeless man for food, gave the man her own sandwich; however, because the man tried to talk while he was eating the sandwich, it caused him to choke, and thus Marilees unintentionally performed a morally bad action.
(E) Jonathan agreed to watch his three-year-old niece while she played but, becoming engrossed in conversion, did not see her run into the street where she was hit by a bicycle; even though he intended no harm, Jonathan's action was morally bad.
Official Explanation
The argument claims that an action is morally good only if it meets
both of the following criteria:
(1) It benefits another person.
(2) It is performed with that intent.
The argument also claims that an action that harms another person is morally bad if it meets
either one of the following criteria:
(1) The harm was intended.
(2) Reasonable forethought would have shown that the action was likely to cause harm.
In choice (E), Jonathan should have realized that if he became engrossed in conversation, he would be neglecting his niece. This satisfies the second criteria for a morally bad action. Reasonable forethought would have shown Jonathan the error of his choice.
The answer is (E).As to the other choices, (A) is second best. The first part of (A), “
Pamela wrote a letter attempting to cause trouble between Edward and his friend,” certainly satisfies the first criterion for a morally bad action. But the remainder of the sentence doesn’t seem to relate to the second criterion.
(B) satisfies the first criterion for a morally good action. However, it fails to meet the second criterion because Jeffrey’s action was performed to benefit himself (by helping him secure a promotion), not to help others.
(C) does not meet either criteria for a morally bad action. Teresa left the ice on the steps accidentally. One could argue, however, that a reasonable person would double check her work. Nevertheless, choice (E) satisfies the second criterion for a morally bad action more directly.
(D) satisfies only the second criterion for a morally good action, and it does not satisfy either criteria for a morally bad action.