Re: It has been commonly accepted for some time now that certain scenes in
[#permalink]
19 Feb 2024, 23:06
This passage discusses the discovery of interpolations (non-Shakespearean sections) in Macbeth, highlighting historical context and potential impacts. It notes the historical significance but argues it complicates character analysis due to mixed authorship.
Author's Tone
The tone of the author is balanced. They present information objectively, discussing both positive (historical insight) and negative (interpretation difficulty) aspects of the discovery. While the mention of "plagiarism" might seem negative, it's more an objective reference than expressing judgment on Shakespeare's intentions or character.
Answer Explanations
1. C) III Only
Correct:
III) Current understanding of plagiarism: The passage explicitly states Elizabethan notions might have differed, supporting this statement.
Incorrect:
I) Shakespeare guilty of plagiarism: The author discusses different interpretations but doesn't label him "guilty."
II) Author's motives: This is mentioned as a problem caused by the interpolations, aligning with statement II.
2. E) I, II, and III
All three options could potentially help:
I) Thematic irregularities within Shakespeare: Comparing other works might reveal similar patterns, indicating potential collaborations or styles influencing both authors.
II) Themes and techniques of contemporaries: Comparing styles of contemporaries like Middleton may highlight similarities or differences, supporting or refuting interpolation claims.
III) Legal documents: Although no guarantee, legal documents could shed light on plagiarism norms or collaborations during that era.