Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 19:08 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 19:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
acegmat1
Joined: 29 May 2013
Last visit: 30 Apr 2015
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
87
 [21]
Given Kudos: 8
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 08-20-2014
GPA: 3.34
Posts: 20
Kudos: 87
 [21]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
aditya8062
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Last visit: 26 Nov 2020
Posts: 503
Own Kudos:
668
 [1]
Given Kudos: 61
Posts: 503
Kudos: 668
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
BPD
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Last visit: 23 Sep 2014
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 12
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

Can some one please help me with why ... due to is wrong here?

Thanks
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,564
 [3]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,564
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"Due to" isn't wrong in itself. It basically means the same thing as "because of." SIDS doesn't occur because of "the fact that" high levels of hemoglobin are found, so (A) is out. It also doesn't occur because of these levels "being found," so (B) is out.

However, the credited response of (E) is not significantly better. We should say that the high levels cause SIDS, not that it occurs because the infants exhibit high levels.
User avatar
blayel
Joined: 10 May 2014
Last visit: 30 Nov 2020
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Posts: 27
Kudos: 133
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There are flaws in the grammatical and meaning of the answer choice. I only discuss B and E.

1) B is grammatically wrong because "due to" is an adjectival prepositional phrase, only modifies noun/ noun phrase and should come after verb "to be".

Thus, "due to" cannot modify the whole clause "SIDS likely occurs more"


2) E is wrong in the meaning, pointed out by Dimitry.

It is not because the infants exhibit high levels but because the high levels themselves that leads to the claim that "SIDS likely occurs"


The question answers are not good. When I study and see such sentences, I just get angry because I feel empathy with those who studies in a decent way and gets bewildering answers (Surely I feel sympathy with myself too :roll: )


DmitryFarber
"Due to" isn't wrong in itself. It basically means the same thing as "because of." SIDS doesn't occur because of "the fact that" high levels of hemoglobin are found, so (A) is out. It also doesn't occur because of these levels "being found," so (B) is out.

However, the credited response of (E) is not significantly better. We should say that the high levels cause SIDS, not that it occurs because the infants exhibit high levels.
User avatar
coreyander
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 31 May 2020
Last visit: 11 Jun 2024
Posts: 171
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 47
Location: India
Posts: 171
Kudos: 1,124
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
"Due to" isn't wrong in itself. It basically means the same thing as "because of." SIDS doesn't occur because of "the fact that" high levels of hemoglobin are found, so (A) is out. It also doesn't occur because of these levels "being found," so (B) is out.

However, the credited response of (E) is not significantly better. We should say that the high levels cause SIDS, not that it occurs because the infants exhibit high levels.
Exactly my thought process. Thank you!
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,830
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,830
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts