It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 01:48

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# It is widely assumed that a museum is helped finan- cially

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 413

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Location: Lungi
It is widely assumed that a museum is helped finan- cially [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2004, 04:14
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

67% (01:20) correct 33% (00:58) wrong based on 6 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

19. It is widely assumed that a museum is helped finan-
cially when a generous patron donates a potential
exhibit. In truth, however, donated objects require
storage space, which is not free, and routine conser-
vation, which is rather expensive. Therefore, such gifts
exacerbate rather than lighten the demands made on
a museum's financial resources.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
(A) To keep patrons well disposed, a museum will
find it advisable to put at least some donated
objects on exhibit rather than merely in storage.
(B) The people who are most likely to donate valu-
able objects to a museum are also the people
who are most likely to make cash gifts to it.
(C) A museum cannot save money by resorting to
cheap storage under less than adequate con-
ditions, because so doing would drive up the
cost of conservation.
(D) Patrons expect a museum to keep donated
objects in its possession rather than to raise
cash by selling them.
(E) Objects donated by a patron to a museum are
often of such importance that the museum
would be obliged to add them to its collec-
tion through purchase if necessary.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2003
Posts: 318

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Location: dallas , tx

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2004, 11:02
between B and E... but E looks strong..
_________________

shubhangi

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 28

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Texas

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2004, 11:41
E. It shows that the museums would HAVE to buy the paintings if they were not donated. Presumably this would cost a lot more than storing free paintings.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Feb 2004
Posts: 290

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Location: USA

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2004, 12:12
B for me...........In case of E, if museum HAS to purcahse the artwork, it has to shell out money and hence it is still a burden, the least being financial help.........

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 292

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: US

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2004, 13:44
E here.

B is wrong because we don't know how sufficient the cash gifts are.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2004, 14:04
B for sure. E was pretty well proved wrong but also does not give any indication as to how it will bring the museum any money.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2004, 16:50
So what does B say?
The people who donate money to the museums will do so only if the museum accepts the valuable objects they donate?
I believe donation is unconditional

Even if they donate money will they donate money in such an amount as to compensate for the cost of maintenance of the donated objects?

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2004, 18:42
B does NOT say that the people who donate money will do so ONLY IF the museum accepts their valuable objects. The issue is not about whether money donation is conditional or not. B only says that the people who donate valuable objects are the MOST LIKELY to make money donation. Now, we do not need to prove that the money donations of those donators completely cover for the storage costs. All we need to do to weaken the argument is to prove that such donations will lighten rather than exacerbate the demands made on a museum's financial resources. B may not completely cover for the storage costs but it will at least lighten the museum's financial strain.

E on the other hand says that those artworks are so important that, if not donated, it would force the museum to pay for them. Primo, let's say those artworks are NOT donated, the museum would then have to pay for them and this would exacerbate their financial strain. Secundo, let's say those artworks ARE donated; then there is no indication as to how this would in part lighten the museum's financial strain. If the first scenario is true, it would STRENGHTEN the argument. If the second scenario, it would not in the least weaken the argument. What do you think Anandnk?
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2004, 19:08
I believe people who donate art objects will give cash gifts anyway. The author is saying the artifacts are a burden more than they are useful. This is the central point of the argument. To refute this we have to show that artifacts are infact necessary with or without donation or the maintanance is bearable.
I believe E says that the artifacts are necessary. IF not donated the museum would buy them anyway and thus incuring maintenance costs. By donating them the burden is reduced.

Let us wait for Mr Batliwala's verdict

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2004, 20:10
anandnk wrote:
I believe people who donate art objects will give cash gifts anyway. The author is saying the artifacts are a burden more than they are useful. This is the central point of the argument. To refute this we have to show that artifacts are infact necessary with or without donation or the maintanance is bearable.
I believe E says that the artifacts are necessary. IF not donated the museum would buy them anyway and thus incuring maintenance costs. By donating them the burden is reduced.

Let us wait for Mr Batliwala's verdict

I read and re-read your argument and I believe you are right. I see your point and indeed, E proves that those objects are not burden but are necessary to the museum and that weakens the argument. Always good learning from an old buddy
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2004, 20:21
Hi Paul,

The feeling is mutual. Let us wait for the answer.

Anand.

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 413

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Location: Lungi

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2004, 20:24
good discussion guys , ans is E.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

08 Apr 2004, 20:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# It is widely assumed that a museum is helped finan- cially

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.