Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
60%
(02:19)
correct 40%
(02:28)
wrong
based on 203
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
It was after tripping on hallucinogenic mushrooms that Christian Angermayer realised he had a personal mission to help the human race improve itself. Having passed through the 'gateway to God' opened by psychedelic drugs, the German tech billionaire wanted to usher the rest of humanity in the same direction. Nowadays his investment fund not only champions the use of such drugs as a treatment for mental-health problems, but is also 'pushing the boundaries for human enhancement overall', meaning treatments to make people stronger, smarter and longer-lived. He has also donated to a $101m prize-pot for scientific breakthroughs that slow ageing and is helping to found a competition called the Enhanced Games, in which athletes can earn $1m for breaking world records using the sorts of doping that would normally disqualify them.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen Angermayer's justification for allowing doping in the Enhanced Games?
A) Research shows psychedelic drug therapy significantly reduces performance anxiety. B) Most sports regulators consider allowing doping only for scientific research, not record-breaking competitions. C) Medical breakthroughs developed through such contests later benefited non-athletes. D) Multiple athletes declined participation due to moral concerns. E) Angermayer invested in a startup that bypasses the negative side effects of performance-enhancing drugs through genetic engineering.
A) Irrelevant: Focuses on psychedelics rather than the core controversy around doping in the Enhanced Games. B) Weakens the argument: Suggests regulators endorse doping exclusively for research, not competitions like the Games, which undermines the initiative's legitimacy and diverts from its human enhancement purpose. C) Correct: Demonstrates that doping-enabled competitions yield broader benefits for human enhancement—advancing Angermayer's mission of improving humanity—by providing new evidence that non-athletes gain from resulting breakthroughs. D) Weakens: Highlights moral objections, which contravenes the initiative's viability and acceptance. E) Irrelevant: While related to human enhancement, this investment offers an alternative solution to doping's drawbacks rather than supporting the justification for allowing doping in the Games.
Overall Explanation: Angermayer justifies doping in the Enhanced Games as advancing human enhancement. Option C strengthens this by showing the contests produce medical breakthroughs benefiting the general population, directly supporting the mission. A is off-topic; B weakens by restricting doping to unrelated contexts; D undermines acceptance; E provides irrelevant alternatives. Correct answer confirms a key assumption per GMAT Strengthen principles.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
But, what's with the word ''Non Athletes'' in the option C?
ravikirancg
It was after tripping on hallucinogenic mushrooms that Christian Angermayer realised he had a personal mission to help the human race improve itself. Having passed through the 'gateway to God' opened by psychedelic drugs, the German tech billionaire wanted to usher the rest of humanity in the same direction. Nowadays his investment fund not only champions the use of such drugs as a treatment for mental-health problems, but is also 'pushing the boundaries for human enhancement overall', meaning treatments to make people stronger, smarter and longer-lived. He has also donated to a $101m prize-pot for scientific breakthroughs that slow ageing and is helping to found a competition called the Enhanced Games, in which athletes can earn $1m for breaking world records using the sorts of doping that would normally disqualify them.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen Angermayer's justification for allowing doping in the Enhanced Games?
A) Research shows psychedelic drug therapy significantly reduces performance anxiety. B) Most sports regulators consider allowing doping only for scientific research, not record-breaking competitions. C) Medical breakthroughs developed through such contests later benefited non-athletes. D) Multiple athletes declined participation due to moral concerns. E) Angermayer invested in a startup that bypasses the negative side effects of performance-enhancing drugs through genetic engineering.
A) Irrelevant: Focuses on psychedelics rather than the core controversy around doping in the Enhanced Games. B) Weakens the argument: Suggests regulators endorse doping exclusively for research, not competitions like the Games, which undermines the initiative's legitimacy and diverts from its human enhancement purpose. C) Correct: Demonstrates that doping-enabled competitions yield broader benefits for human enhancement—advancing Angermayer's mission of improving humanity—by providing new evidence that non-athletes gain from resulting breakthroughs. D) Weakens: Highlights moral objections, which contravenes the initiative's viability and acceptance. E) Irrelevant: While related to human enhancement, this investment offers an alternative solution to doping's drawbacks rather than supporting the justification for allowing doping in the Games.
Overall Explanation: Angermayer justifies doping in the Enhanced Games as advancing human enhancement. Option C strengthens this by showing the contests produce medical breakthroughs benefiting the general population, directly supporting the mission. A is off-topic; B weakens by restricting doping to unrelated contexts; D undermines acceptance; E provides irrelevant alternatives. Correct answer confirms a key assumption per GMAT Strengthen principles.
What's the source of this question? can you please share the OA?
ravikirancg
It was after tripping on hallucinogenic mushrooms that Christian Angermayer realised he had a personal mission to help the human race improve itself. Having passed through the 'gateway to God' opened by psychedelic drugs, the German tech billionaire wanted to usher the rest of humanity in the same direction. Nowadays his investment fund not only champions the use of such drugs as a treatment for mental-health problems, but is also 'pushing the boundaries for human enhancement overall', meaning treatments to make people stronger, smarter and longer-lived. He has also donated to a $101m prize-pot for scientific breakthroughs that slow ageing and is helping to found a competition called the Enhanced Games, in which athletes can earn $1m for breaking world records using the sorts of doping that would normally disqualify them.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen Angermayer's justification for allowing doping in the Enhanced Games?
A) Research shows psychedelic drug therapy significantly reduces performance anxiety. B) Most sports regulators consider allowing doping only for scientific research, not record-breaking competitions. C) Medical breakthroughs developed through such contests later benefited non-athletes. D) Multiple athletes declined participation due to moral concerns. E) Angermayer invested in a startup that bypasses the negative side effects of performance-enhancing drugs through genetic engineering.
A) Irrelevant: Focuses on psychedelics rather than the core controversy around doping in the Enhanced Games. B) Weakens the argument: Suggests regulators endorse doping exclusively for research, not competitions like the Games, which undermines the initiative's legitimacy and diverts from its human enhancement purpose. C) Correct: Demonstrates that doping-enabled competitions yield broader benefits for human enhancement—advancing Angermayer's mission of improving humanity—by providing new evidence that non-athletes gain from resulting breakthroughs. D) Weakens: Highlights moral objections, which contravenes the initiative's viability and acceptance. E) Irrelevant: While related to human enhancement, this investment offers an alternative solution to doping's drawbacks rather than supporting the justification for allowing doping in the Games.
Overall Explanation: Angermayer justifies doping in the Enhanced Games as advancing human enhancement. Option C strengthens this by showing the contests produce medical breakthroughs benefiting the general population, directly supporting the mission. A is off-topic; B weakens by restricting doping to unrelated contexts; D undermines acceptance; E provides irrelevant alternatives. Correct answer confirms a key assumption per GMAT Strengthen principles.
OA is C. As for source, these are custom practice questions I've created as part of GMAT prep materials I'm working on.
ManifestDreamMBA
What's the source of this question? can you please share the OA?
ravikirancg
It was after tripping on hallucinogenic mushrooms that Christian Angermayer realised he had a personal mission to help the human race improve itself. Having passed through the 'gateway to God' opened by psychedelic drugs, the German tech billionaire wanted to usher the rest of humanity in the same direction. Nowadays his investment fund not only champions the use of such drugs as a treatment for mental-health problems, but is also 'pushing the boundaries for human enhancement overall', meaning treatments to make people stronger, smarter and longer-lived. He has also donated to a $101m prize-pot for scientific breakthroughs that slow ageing and is helping to found a competition called the Enhanced Games, in which athletes can earn $1m for breaking world records using the sorts of doping that would normally disqualify them.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen Angermayer's justification for allowing doping in the Enhanced Games?
A) Research shows psychedelic drug therapy significantly reduces performance anxiety. B) Most sports regulators consider allowing doping only for scientific research, not record-breaking competitions. C) Medical breakthroughs developed through such contests later benefited non-athletes. D) Multiple athletes declined participation due to moral concerns. E) Angermayer invested in a startup that bypasses the negative side effects of performance-enhancing drugs through genetic engineering.
A) Irrelevant: Focuses on psychedelics rather than the core controversy around doping in the Enhanced Games. B) Weakens the argument: Suggests regulators endorse doping exclusively for research, not competitions like the Games, which undermines the initiative's legitimacy and diverts from its human enhancement purpose. C) Correct: Demonstrates that doping-enabled competitions yield broader benefits for human enhancement—advancing Angermayer's mission of improving humanity—by providing new evidence that non-athletes gain from resulting breakthroughs. D) Weakens: Highlights moral objections, which contravenes the initiative's viability and acceptance. E) Irrelevant: While related to human enhancement, this investment offers an alternative solution to doping's drawbacks rather than supporting the justification for allowing doping in the Games.
Overall Explanation: Angermayer justifies doping in the Enhanced Games as advancing human enhancement. Option C strengthens this by showing the contests produce medical breakthroughs benefiting the general population, directly supporting the mission. A is off-topic; B weakens by restricting doping to unrelated contexts; D undermines acceptance; E provides irrelevant alternatives. Correct answer confirms a key assumption per GMAT Strengthen principles.
but is also 'pushing the boundaries for human enhancement overall
Investment made by keeping the above in mind would mean that all such practices are supported. For which the Enhanced Games is one of those practices.
The idea is: Since Enhanced Games allow doping, the competition would lead to a competitive development of drugs leading to even more R&D in order to win the competition.
This would result in drugs that are actually useful (apart from competition) to be given to non athletes.
Answer is C
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.