Alka10
Hi folks,
Isn't it a cause effect question?
something HAPPENED , RESULTING in something.
HAPPENED - Cause in past tense
Resulting: Effect in V+ing form.
So, I marked C for that reason, please ignore known form at the end of sentence as I am confused about C&E form in this Q.
Thnks
Hello
Alka10,
We hope this finds you well.
To answer your query, the present participle ("verb+ing" - "granting" in this case) conveys a cause-effect relationship as part of the "comma + present participle" construction; without a comma before "granting", it cannot convey cause and effect.
Further, even if there were a comma, such a construction would produce an illogical meaning; consider the clause "It was the loss of revenue from declines in tourism that in 1935 led the Saudi authorities"; the action referred to in this sentence is the action of leading the Saudi authorities, an action done by "the loss of revenue", so if the "comma + present participle" construction were applied here, it would imply that the loss of revenue led the Saudi authorities, in general, and as a result, the loss granted a concession for oil exploration.
We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team