Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
14%
(01:12)
correct 86%
(01:03)
wrong
based on 12
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply.
Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?
A In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
B In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.
C Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.
D People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.
E People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Brad's reply forgets to consider the fact that Videorama sells AND rents videos. If A were, true, then the number of videos rented and sold would approach 10000.
Is the question wrong ? I dont see any of the choices weakening Brad's objection. E is strengthening brad's claim that there is an alternate reason for the decrease in rentals
It provides a logical explanation to why 10,000 fewer videos were handled by Centreville, thus weakening Brad's logic that something other than Videorama would account for those 10,000 vdos
For Caas
E
Because Brad fails to take into account possibility of renting/loaning to friends.
He mentioned that Videorama , new company, sold only 4000. What if each of this buyer loaned to many friends. Then if it is true these friends instead of buying just borrows from their friends who bought Videos. thus
Videorama took OTHER outlets' share, which exemplifies significant drop (10 000).
I don't see how E would weaken Brad's claim. In fact, E is providing an alternate explanation as Brad suggests, thus strengthening his claim that it's not Videorama's fault, it's the fault of customers who are loaning to their friends.
Both A and E could, and could not, weaken the force of the objection.
A: In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
A1.- Videorama rented out 50000 (!!!), which is > 4000 --> A would be OA. A2.- Videorama rented out 4001 > 4000 --> 4000+4001 < 10000 --> A is wrong.
E: People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.
E1.- Videorama sold 4000 videos, let say one person bought one video and shared it with 5 friends. Total loses=4000*1*5=20000 > 10000 --> A would be OA.
E2.- Videorama sold 4000 videos, let say to 2 people (P1 and P2, 2000 videos each). P1 only has 2 friends (P2 and P3), and also P2 only has 2 friends (P1 and P3). The loses are: 2000 (videos that P2 share with P1) + 2000 (videos that P1 share with P2) + 4000 (videos that P1 and P2 share with P3) = 8000<10000 --> E would be wrong.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.