Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 26 Mar 2017, 10:26

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 648
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 231 [0], given: 51

Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 May 2011, 08:27
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

74% (02:19) correct 26% (01:41) wrong based on 177 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the journalist’s argument?

(A) Every article based on experiments with particle accelerators that was submitted for publication last year actually was published.
(B) The average time scientists must wait for access to a particle accelerator has declined over the last several years.
(C) The number of physics journals was the same last year as in previous years.
(D) Particle accelerators can be used for more than one group of experiments in any given year.
(E) Recent changes in the editorial policies of several physics journals have decreased the likelihood that articles concerning particle-accelerator research will be accepted for publication.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1346
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 250 [0], given: 10

Re: og10 302 [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 May 2011, 00:31
Its a clean E, giving an alternate cause for the decline in number of articles published.

time around 1 min.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 244
Location: India
GMAT Date: 07-16-2012
GPA: 3.4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 25

Re: og10 302 [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Aug 2011, 01:57
Clearly answer should be E as this provides alternate reason for decrease in reports
_________________

-------Analyze why option A in SC wrong-------

Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2011
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: og10 302 [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Aug 2011, 02:58
Clearly E as only that gives alternate reason.
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3152
Followers: 821

Kudos [?]: 6927 [0], given: 1051

Re: og10 302 [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Aug 2011, 19:09
700 level ?? mmmmmmmmm
_________________
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2011
Posts: 78
Schools: NUS
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 32

Re: og10 302 [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Aug 2011, 23:56
+1 for E,but D also seems tempting as it implies that there was not actually any dearth of particle accelerators to do the experiment and publish the article thus there may be another reason for the low number of articles.
Intern
Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Posts: 8
GPA: 3.97
WE: Analyst (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

Re: Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jun 2012, 12:52
what threw me off was the present/future tense of the answer E - "recent changes" and "will be accepted for publication", considering that the question talks about "last year". I automatically assumed that these recent changes couldn't have any effect on articles published last year. Has anyone else noticed it?
Manager
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 213
Location: New Delhi, India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 12

Re: Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jun 2012, 22:29
Why is D option not correct?
_________________

Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

Manager
Status: Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 133
Location: Philippines
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 660 Q V
GPA: 3.22
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 16

Re: Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jun 2012, 23:28
narangvaibhav wrote:
Why is D option not correct?

The best way to answer this is to determine the parts of the argument:

Premise: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years.

Premise: Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs.

Conclusion: It is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.

In here we could see that causation. Simply put: Out of service particle accelerators ----> Low number of articles

The question is asking us to undermine (weaken) the argument. We know that one of the ways to weaken an argument is to introduce another cause to the intended effect.

This is the reason why D is the answer. D provides us another cause that 'caused' the effect. The importance of determining the parts of the argument is that it helps us determine which among the answer choices 'destroys' the conclusion. In this case, D totally demolishes it.
_________________

Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat.
- T. Roosevelt

Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 150
Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 24

Re: Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Dec 2013, 10:12
E must be the answer.

Conclusion: the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.

(D) Particle accelerators can be used for more than one group of experiments in any given year.

Choice D tells us that particle accelerators can be more effectively used to publish more number of articles. But it is not what the conclusion of the argument is concerned about. The right answer must find an alternative reason for the low number of articles.
_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks

"Pay attention to every detail"

Re: Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles   [#permalink] 29 Dec 2013, 10:12
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 The number of articles concerning the use of sensatorium dummies 3 07 Oct 2014, 11:37
2 The number of articles concerning the use of sensatorium 1 01 Jan 2013, 15:51
The increase in the number of newspaper articles exposed as 17 19 Jul 2011, 19:17
59 Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles 40 09 Oct 2010, 02:59
Like a number of other articles, Ian Raghnalls article 23 06 Aug 2009, 07:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.