Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 17:41 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 17:41
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Dreaming
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2015
Posts: 158
Own Kudos:
248
 [116]
Given Kudos: 34
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
GPA: 3.18
WE:Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Products:
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
Posts: 158
Kudos: 248
 [116]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
103
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
15,571
 [12]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,571
 [12]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ChrisLele
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Last visit: 27 Jul 2020
Posts: 295
Own Kudos:
4,843
 [11]
Given Kudos: 2
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 295
Kudos: 4,843
 [11]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
hellscream
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Last visit: 26 Sep 2021
Posts: 120
Own Kudos:
80
 [5]
Given Kudos: 109
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.67
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 120
Kudos: 80
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I choose D for the sake of parallelism. diet that.... but that
User avatar
Dreaming
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2015
Posts: 158
Own Kudos:
248
 [4]
Given Kudos: 34
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
GPA: 3.18
WE:Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Products:
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
Posts: 158
Kudos: 248
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But isnt it wrong to say ......'calories than they'???? isnt tht comparing calories with 'they'-the rats??
User avatar
Jp27
Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Last visit: 25 Dec 2013
Posts: 171
Own Kudos:
1,194
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 171
Kudos: 1,194
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the simplest way to attack E is, on GMAT, "which" cannot be used without a COMMA. That's enf to ding answer choice E!

HTH
User avatar
stoy4o
Joined: 20 Sep 2008
Last visit: 01 Dec 2015
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
417
 [3]
Given Kudos: 165
Products:
Posts: 57
Kudos: 417
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
a)of at least 30% fewer calories than that which they would normally eat, but that otherwise
"That which" refers to the diet, whereas we're comparing the # of calories
b) with at least 30% fewer calories than what they would normally eat though otheriwse it
"diet with" is not a correct idiom. "What" seems unnecessary, too.
c) that has at least 30% fewer of the calories than they would normally eat, but otherwise it
Wrongly compares calories with "they" (mice).
d) that has at least 30% fewer calories than they would normally eat but that otherwise
1) ...."that"... "that" is in parallel
2) There is only one antecedent to "they". Although "calories" is closer, it doesn't make sense for "calories" to refer to "they".

e) that has at least 30% fewer calories than that which they normally eat, though that otherise
- just for fun, this one's solely wrong because "otherise" is misspelled :P
User avatar
GMATDemiGod
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 05 Feb 2017
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 213
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V38
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
Posts: 64
Kudos: 52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hey guys

I have a question about construction of "that which they" or "that which"

Is this construction fine to use?

Has there been any correct GMAT questions that have that and which next to each other? This structure seems a bit odd to me.

Thanks
User avatar
amarinetti
Joined: 05 Apr 2016
Last visit: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Posts: 18
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet of at least 30% fewer calories than that which they would normally eat, but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.
Why is A wrong?
Aren't they comparing two diets? In that case "than that" is required.
Am I wrong?
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
15,571
 [3]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,571
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mariwa
Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet of at least 30% fewer calories than that which they would normally eat, but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.
Why is A wrong?
Aren't they comparing two diets? In that case "than that" is required.
Am I wrong?

Option A:
Two relative pronouns ("that which") one after the other is awkward (though grammatically not incorrect).
"diet of 30% ..." is awkward - "diet of..." is generally used to specify particular foods - e.g., "diet of non-vegetarian foods", "diet of curd-rice" etc.

Option D:
Yes, ideally "than that" is to be used. However as has been frequently observed, GMAT allows omission of repeated words form the second element of a parallel structure.

The following post is more detailed:
laboratory-rats-and-mice-live-up-to-40-percent-longer-than-130331-20.html#p1703220
User avatar
sanghar
Joined: 24 Oct 2014
Last visit: 02 Feb 2020
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
14
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: United Arab Emirates
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.56
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Posts: 40
Kudos: 14
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi sayantanc2k

Wanted to clarify one point - the omitted relative pronoun after "than" in the corrected sentence shouldn't be "that", but should be "those" as it is supposed to be referring to "calories", in keeping with the meaning? I have indicated this below:-

Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet that has at least 30% fewer calories than they would normally eat but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.

Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet that has at least 30% fewer calories than those (the calories) they would normally eat but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.
User avatar
mejia401
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Last visit: 26 Nov 2018
Posts: 251
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Location: United States
WE:Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)
Posts: 251
Kudos: 1,438
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sanghar
Hi sayantanc2k

Wanted to clarify one point - the omitted relative pronoun after "than" in the corrected sentence shouldn't be "that", but should be "those" as it is supposed to be referring to "calories", in keeping with the meaning? I have indicated this below:-

Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet that has at least 30% fewer calories than they would normally eat but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.

Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet that has at least 30% fewer calories than those (the calories) they would normally eat but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.


The antecedent of "that" is a diet, and the diet is the direct object of the phrase "they would normally eat." This construction is impressively confusing. I never thought you could remove a direct object but indeed, if the meaning remains intact, there ought to be no issue at all.
User avatar
mejia401
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Last visit: 26 Nov 2018
Posts: 251
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Location: United States
WE:Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)
Posts: 251
Kudos: 1,438
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sanghar
Hi sayantanc2k

Wanted to clarify one point - the omitted relative pronoun after "than" in the corrected sentence shouldn't be "that", but should be "those" as it is supposed to be referring to "calories", in keeping with the meaning? I have indicated this below:-

Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet that has at least 30% fewer calories than they would normally eat but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.

Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet that has at least 30% fewer calories than those (the calories) they would normally eat but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.


This construction is impressively clever. The test makers switched the transitive verb "fed" with the intransitive verb "eat", thereby switching the construction of the parallelism. I don't think there is anything but perhaps the food itself that could go there. Even "calories" is non-nonsensical. You eat food, not calories. Calories are the byproduct of your body breaking down the food into units of energy. I hope this helps. I'm sure sayantanc2k will have something to add.
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
15,571
 [5]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,571
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mejia401
sanghar
Hi sayantanc2k

Wanted to clarify one point - the omitted relative pronoun after "than" in the corrected sentence shouldn't be "that", but should be "those" as it is supposed to be referring to "calories", in keeping with the meaning? I have indicated this below:-

Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet that has at least 30% fewer calories than they would normally eat but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.

Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet that has at least 30% fewer calories than those (the calories) they would normally eat but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.


The antecedent of "that" is a diet, and the diet is the direct object of the phrase "they would normally eat." This construction is impressively confusing. I never thought you could remove a direct object but indeed, if the meaning remains intact, there ought to be no issue at all.

sanghar 's point is also correct - the pronoun should be "those" since it refers to "calories". The comparison apparently becomes faulty otherwise. (Why I used "apparently" is discussed later in this post)

Wrong (apparently): The diet has 30% less calories than that (the diet) they would normally eat. (apparently wrong comparison "diet" with "calories")
Correct: The diet has 30% less calories than those (the calories) they would normally eat. (correct comparison "calories" with "calories").

Now, why I used "apparently" above:
Alternatively "diet" could be used in a different way to maintain parallelism:
The diet has 30% less calories than HAS that (the diet) they would normally eat.
But again by virtue of parallelism "has" can be omitted.
The diet has 30% less calories than has that (the diet) they would normally eat.

So, "that" and "those" both are correct, but the construction of the sentence changes (and since the construction is omitted it does not matter whether "that" or "those" is used).
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,571
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mejia401
sanghar
Hi sayantanc2k

Wanted to clarify one point - the omitted relative pronoun after "than" in the corrected sentence shouldn't be "that", but should be "those" as it is supposed to be referring to "calories", in keeping with the meaning? I have indicated this below:-

Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet that has at least 30% fewer calories than they would normally eat but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.

Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet that has at least 30% fewer calories than those (the calories) they would normally eat but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.


This construction is impressively clever. The test makers switched the transitive verb "fed" with the intransitive verb "eat", thereby switching the construction of the parallelism. I don't think there is anything but perhaps the food itself that could go there. Even "calories" is non-nonsensical. You eat food, not calories. Calories are the byproduct of your body breaking down the food into units of energy. I hope this helps. I'm sure sayantanc2k will have something to add.

Technically you are right, but in my opinion, it is acceptable to say: I eat so many calories in a day.
The grammatical implication of "this" and "those" is discussed in the post above.
User avatar
articuno
Joined: 05 Aug 2011
Last visit: 05 Apr 2018
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
17
 [3]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: United States (NY)
Undergraduate: Stanford
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V40
WE:Asset Management (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V40
Posts: 10
Kudos: 17
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet of at least 30% fewer calories than that which they would normally eat, but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.

(A) of at least 30% fewer calories than that which they would normally eat, but that otherwise
- Uses 'that' twice to refer to different items
- Compares calories vs diet
- Eliminate

(B) with at least 30% fewer calories than what they would normally eat though otherwise it
- Compares calories vs (what = not calories)
- Eliminate

(C) that has at least 30% fewer of the calories that they would normally eat, but otherwise it
- Uses the word 'fewer' without using the word 'than'
- Eliminate

(D) that has at least 30% fewer calories than they would normally eat but that otherwise
- Keep

(E) that has at least 30% fewer calories than that which they normally eat, though that otherwise
- Uses 'that' twice to refer to two different items
- Compares calories vs a diet
- Eliminate
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 04 Apr 2026
Posts: 743
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 743
Kudos: 419
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dreaming
Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet of at least 30% fewer calories than that which they would normally eat, but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.

(A) of at least 30% fewer calories than that which they would normally eat, but that otherwise

(B) with at least 30% fewer calories than what they would normally eat though otherwise it

(C) that has at least 30% fewer of the calories than they would normally eat, but otherwise it

(D) that has at least 30% fewer calories than they would normally eat but that otherwise

(E) that has at least 30% fewer calories than that which they normally eat, though that otherwise

GMATPREP Code : VSC003901

https://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/22/us/a-pill-to-extend-life-don-t-dismiss-the-notion-too-quickly.html

Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40 percent longer than usual when fed a diet that has at least 30 percent fewer calories than they would usually eat though otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients. The animals are free of age-related disease and appear healthy in every respect except that they are generally less fertile.

Attachment:
Untitled.png

it is hard to find out why choice D is wrong. i can give you an example in which a pattern similar to choice D is right.

the diet they eat today has fewer calories than "that' they normally eat.

this sentence without "that" can be correct on gmat though we never have to choice between a sentence with "that" and another without "that".
what I want to say is that we do not need "that" in choice D if we have a paralel pattern to infer the cut off element.

in comparison , we need "that, those" or paralel pattern to infer the cut off part. this is main point.

so, choice D is clearly wrong because it has no "that" and has no paralel pattern.
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 04 Apr 2026
Posts: 743
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 743
Kudos: 419
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
https://gmatclub.com/forum/after-weeks- ... 17149.html

if above question is from 2019 og, we need to say that the rule of comparison is not absolute.

in OA for above sentence, we do not need "that" and we have no parallel pattern, but the sentence is still correct.

so, the comparison rule is not absolute
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 1,974
Own Kudos:
10,158
 [5]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 1,974
Kudos: 10,158
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet of at least 30% fewer calories than that which they would normally eat, but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.


(A) of at least 30% fewer calories than that which they would normally eat, but that otherwise - than THAT which they would normally eat
a diet...THAT otherwise contains all necessary nutrients
The first that refers to the DIET NORMALLY EATEN BY RATS.
The second that refers to the DIET THAT HAS FEWER CALORIES but otherwise contains all necessary nutrients.
Within the context of a single modifier, the same pronoun -- THAT -- cannot serve to replace two different referents (the two different diets).

(B) with at least 30% fewer calories than what they would normally eat though otherwise it - "Diet with" is unidiomatic ; the usage of what conveys that rats normally would eat something OTHER THAN CALORIES.
As a result, B illogically compares CALORIES to something OTHER THAN CALORIES

(C) that has at least 30% fewer of the calories than they would normally eat, but otherwise it - Option B and C seem to imply the following contrast:
Laboratory rats live longer, EVEN THOUGH their diet contains all necessary nutrients.
Not the intention.
The intended meaning is as follows:
Laboratory rats live longer when fed a diet THAT contains all necessary nutrients.

(D) that has at least 30% fewer calories than they would normally eat but that otherwise - Correct

(E) that has at least 30% fewer calories than that which they normally eat, though that otherwise - same as A

Answer D
avatar
Beqa
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Last visit: 20 Jun 2021
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
46
 [1]
Given Kudos: 52
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.67
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 16
Kudos: 46
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18
Laboratory rats and mice live up to 40% longer than usual when fed a diet of at least 30% fewer calories than that which they would normally eat, but that otherwise contains all necessary vitamins and nutrients.


(A) of at least 30% fewer calories than that which they would normally eat, but that otherwise - than THAT which they would normally eat
a diet...THAT otherwise contains all necessary nutrients
The first that refers to the DIET NORMALLY EATEN BY RATS.
The second that refers to the DIET THAT HAS FEWER CALORIES but otherwise contains all necessary nutrients.
Within the context of a single modifier, the same pronoun -- THAT -- cannot serve to replace two different referents (the two different diets).

(B) with at least 30% fewer calories than what they would normally eat though otherwise it - "Diet with" is unidiomatic ; the usage of what conveys that rats normally would eat something OTHER THAN CALORIES.
As a result, B illogically compares CALORIES to something OTHER THAN CALORIES

(C) that has at least 30% fewer of the calories than they would normally eat, but otherwise it - Option B and C seem to imply the following contrast:
Laboratory rats live longer, EVEN THOUGH their diet contains all necessary nutrients.
Not the intention.
The intended meaning is as follows:
Laboratory rats live longer when fed a diet THAT contains all necessary nutrients.

(D) that has at least 30% fewer calories than they would normally eat but that otherwise - Correct

(E) that has at least 30% fewer calories than that which they normally eat, though that otherwise - same as A

Answer D

Excellent. That is exactly what I am looking for. Can you please explain if there is any difference between:
Rats are fed a diet of at least 30% fewer calories than they would normally eat --> Compare sentences
and
Rats are fed a diet of at least 30% fewer calories than that which they would normally eat --> Compare DIET

I do not think that the 2nd sentence is wrong.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
495 posts
358 posts