Hi FreshStove,You've spotted the exact thing that decides these problems, so let's nail it down. When a statement says
"If 0 < y, then ...", it is only counted as
true when it holds for
every allowed value of y - fractions included. So there are two different jobs:
- To call a statement
false, you need just
one counterexample.
- To call a statement
true, it must survive
all values - you can't find even one exception.
That's why the posts above dismissed
I so fast:
*1 = 4/1 − 1 = 3, which is positive. One counterexample is enough - I is out.
Now to your real worry:
can fractions break II or III? Let's actually test them instead of guessing.
Statement III: rewrite it the way Scott did -
y(*y) = 4 − y2. Try a fraction,
y = 1/2: that's
4 − 1/4 = 3.75, still under
5. In fact, since y is positive,
y2 is positive, so you're always subtracting something from
4. The result can never even reach
4, let alone
5.
No fraction can break it.Statement II: pick
y = 1/2 and
z = 1. Then
*(1/2) = 8 − 1/2 = 7.5 and
*1 = 3. The smaller input gave the bigger output - exactly what II claims. This always happens: as y grows,
4/y shrinks
and−y shrinks, so
*y only ever goes down.
Fractions follow the same rule.So the reason the answer stays
D is simple: I has a counterexample, but II and III have
none - not with whole numbers, not with fractions. Try to build a fraction counterexample to III yourself; watch how
4 − y2 refuses to reach
5. That's the whole idea.
Answer: DFreshStove
I am still not able to understand the answer. For each of the three cases I, II and III, I think there are cases where the mentioned is not true. So would we still consider it? Like if we consider y and z as fractions?