Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 12
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Lofgren’s disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren’s disease, however, and chickens ommercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information provided?
A. The virus that causes Lofgren’s disease cannot be transmitted to human beings by chickens.
B. There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren’s disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease.
C. A failure to observe Lofgren’s disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease.
D. An animal that has been infected with the virus that causes Lofgren’s disease but that has not developed symptoms cannot transmit the disease to an uninfected animal of the same species.
E. The feed that chickens and cattle are fed is probably not the only source of the virus that causes Lofgren’s disease.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The argument says that "Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren’s disease" This does not mean that there is no other way to detect whether the chicken is infected before that. Developing symptoms could be just one way of detecting infection.... you cannot assume it is the ONLY way.
C can be pretty much supported by the premises given in the argument. Just because there are no symptoms does not mean the chicken is not infected... since it takes more than a year to detect the symtoms.
singh_amit19
Lofgren’s disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren’s disease, however, and chickens ommercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information provided?
A. The virus that causes Lofgren’s disease cannot be transmitted to human beings by chickens. B. There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren’s disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease. C. A failure to observe Lofgren’s disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease. D. An animal that has been infected with the virus that causes Lofgren’s disease but that has not developed symptoms cannot transmit the disease to an uninfected animal of the same species. E. The feed that chickens and cattle are fed is probably not the only source of the virus that causes Lofgren’s disease.
The argument says that "Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren’s disease" This does not mean that there is no other way to detect whether the chicken is infected before that. Developing symptoms could be just one way of detecting infection.... you cannot assume it is the ONLY way.
C can be pretty much supported by the premises given in the argument. Just because there are no symptoms does not mean the chicken is not infected... since it takes more than a year to detect the symtoms.
Show more
Lofgren’s disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens.
So we already know that chickens is not immune to disease so "C" is not making much sense trying to point out the fact that chickens are immune to the disease.
Lofgren’s disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren’s disease, however, and chickens ommercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information provided?
A. The virus that causes Lofgren’s disease cannot be transmitted to human beings by chickens. B. There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren’s disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease. C. A failure to observe Lofgren’s disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease. D. An animal that has been infected with the virus that causes Lofgren’s disease but that has not developed symptoms cannot transmit the disease to an uninfected animal of the same species. E. The feed that chickens and cattle are fed is probably not the only source of the virus that causes Lofgren’s disease.
Show more
I picked B too, and I still don't understand OA's reasoning. The first sentence states that the virus is found, but only rarely. In statement C, it says that the "it is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus". Immunity to the virus is not a question here since some chickens have already been spotted.
The point of the passage is "Lofgren’s disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens"
and the reason why its spotted rarely is because SYMPTOMS are the only way someone can tell if chickens have the virus - meaning there is no other way of finding out if the chicken has a virus other than purely going by symptoms - answer B.
Lofgren’s disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens. Both cattle and chickens raised for meat are often fed the type of feed that transmits the virus that causes the disease. Animals infected with the virus take more than a year to develop symptoms of Lofgren’s disease, however, and chickens ommercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during their first year of life.
Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information provided?
A. The virus that causes Lofgren’s disease cannot be transmitted to human beings by chickens. B. There is no way to determine whether a chicken is infected with the Lofgren’s disease virus before the chicken shows symptoms of the disease. C. A failure to observe Lofgren’s disease in commercial chicken populations is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus that causes this disease. D. An animal that has been infected with the virus that causes Lofgren’s disease but that has not developed symptoms cannot transmit the disease to an uninfected animal of the same species. E. The feed that chickens and cattle are fed is probably not the only source of the virus that causes Lofgren’s disease.
I picked B too, and I still don't understand OA's reasoning. The first sentence states that the virus is found, but only rarely. In statement C, it says that the "it is not good evidence that chickens are immune to the virus". Immunity to the virus is not a question here since some chickens have already been spotted.
The point of the passage is "Lofgren’s disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens" and the reason why its spotted rarely is because SYMPTOMS are the only way someone can tell if chickens have the virus - meaning there is no other way of finding out if the chicken has a virus other than purely going by symptoms - answer B.
Someone please help! Thanks!
Show more
I also have the same line of thoughts as yours.....only reason i can come up with to negate B is it's an extreme choice ONLY, which should be avoided on GMAT-CRs as KAPLAN says Not a good point i know!!!
The point of the passage is "Lofgren’s disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens" and the reason why its spotted rarely is because SYMPTOMS are the only way someone can tell if chickens have the virus - meaning there is no other way of finding out if the chicken has a virus other than purely going by symptoms - answer B.
Someone please help! Thanks!
Show more
I dont know why everyone is convinced that symptoms is the ONLY way to tell if chickens have the virus. The passage does not say so anywhere. Why are you assuming that?
Lofgren’s disease has been observed frequently in commercially raised cattle but very rarely in chickens.
So we already know that chickens is not immune to disease so "C" is not making much sense trying to point out the fact that chickens are immune to the disease.
Show more
It would NOT make sense if it was trying to point that chickens are immune to the disease.
But C is making a perfectly valid statement when it says that just because you fail to observe the disease in commercial chicken populations it does NOT PROVE that chickens are immune to the disease.
While statement B is going too far in saying that there is NO way to determine whether a chicken is infected before you see symptoms. Nothing in the argument says that symptoms are the only way.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.