Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49430

Question Stats:
68% (01:07) correct 32% (01:07) wrong based on 187 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49430

Re M0212
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2014, 00:17
Official Solution: Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. If \(x\) is a prime number, then \(x\) can be 7, 17, 37, and so on. 7 is divisible by 7, but 17 and 37 are not. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. If \(x = 7\), then the answer to the question is yes. If \(x = 17\) then the answer is no; if \(x = 37\) then the answer is no. Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. \(x\) can still be 7, 17, 37, etc. Answer: E
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 25 Dec 2012
Posts: 17

Re: M0212
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Mar 2015, 18:33
Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. If \(x\) is a prime number, then \(x\) can be 7, 17, 37, and so on. 7 is divisible by 7, but 17 and 37 are not. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. If \(x = 7\), then the answer to the question is yes. If \(x = 17\) then the answer is no; if \(x = 37\) then the answer is no. Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. \(x\) can still be 7, 17, 37, etc.
Answer: E Hi Brunel, I got the same answer, but it took me more than 3 minutes to confirme my answer. Do you know if is it possible to do the question in a faster way? Regards, Gonzalo



Intern
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 3

Re: M0212
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Nov 2015, 11:14
Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. If \(x\) is a prime number, then \(x\) can be 7, 17, 37, and so on. 7 is divisible by 7, but 17 and 37 are not. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. If \(x = 7\), then the answer to the question is yes. If \(x = 17\) then the answer is no; if \(x = 37\) then the answer is no. Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. \(x\) can still be 7, 17, 37, etc.
Answer: E Hi Bunuel, Statement (1) Says X is prime. How is one of the answers then 7? 1 is not a prime number please help me understand then how 5(1) +2 is in this range then? I'm likely misunderstanding your given solution. Thanks



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49430

Re: M0212
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Nov 2015, 10:39
stov10 wrote: Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. If \(x\) is a prime number, then \(x\) can be 7, 17, 37, and so on. 7 is divisible by 7, but 17 and 37 are not. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. If \(x = 7\), then the answer to the question is yes. If \(x = 17\) then the answer is no; if \(x = 37\) then the answer is no. Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. \(x\) can still be 7, 17, 37, etc.
Answer: E Hi Bunuel, Statement (1) Says X is prime. How is one of the answers then 7? 1 is not a prime number please help me understand then how 5(1) +2 is in this range then? I'm likely misunderstanding your given solution. Thanks The stem says that the remainder is 2 when x is divided by 5. (1) says that x is a prime number. x can be 7 because 7 is a prime and 7 divided by 5 gives the remainder of 2.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 04 Jan 2017
Posts: 5

Re: M0212
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Apr 2017, 10:12
Hi Bunuel
From the question we can make out that x has ones digit of 2 or 7.
1. This eliminates all the nos. with 2 as units digit. So, as you said the no. could be 7, 17, 37, 57 etc. But none of these, or any of the greater prime nos. with units digit as 7, are divisible by 7. Hence, sufficient.
2. Statement one is a subset of statement 2, without the "prime no. condition", therefore can also have a no. like 77. Hence, not sufficient.
Ans: Option 1
What is your take?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49430

Re: M0212
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Apr 2017, 10:49
bibinphilips wrote: Hi Bunuel
From the question we can make out that x has ones digit of 2 or 7.
1. This eliminates all the nos. with 2 as units digit. So, as you said the no. could be 7, 17, 37, 57 etc. But none of these, or any of the greater prime nos. with units digit as 7, are divisible by 7. Hence, sufficient.
2. Statement one is a subset of statement 2, without the "prime no. condition", therefore can also have a no. like 77. Hence, not sufficient.
Ans: Option 1
What is your take? I don't understand what you mean by the red part. For (1): x can be 7 so divisible by 7 or say 17, so not divisible by 7. Two different answers not sufficient.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Posts: 4

Re: M0212
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Sep 2018, 20:09
Bunuel wrote: If the remainder is 2 when \(x\) is divided by 5, then is \(x\) divisible by 7?
(1) \(x\) is a prime number
(2) \(x + 3\) is a multiple of 10 Hey BunuelJust to understand, x can be 2 also in general and even for answer choice 1. 2 divided by 5 will leave the remainder as 2. Am I missing something? Thanks



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49430

Re: M0212
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Sep 2018, 02:53










