Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 48061

Question Stats:
30% (01:22) correct 70% (01:47) wrong based on 94 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 48061

Re M1325
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2014, 00:49



Intern
Joined: 14 Mar 2015
Posts: 34

Re: M1325
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Sep 2015, 00:24
Bunuel wrote: Official Solution: Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. These angles seem to define the lengths of arcs. The angles can come from different sides of the arc. On the images below you can see that both cases comply with the S2, but have different answers to the question. We need one more condition to define the arcs. Statements (1) and (2) combined are sufficient. If \(\angle\) ADB is acute and greater than \(\angle\) CAD, then arc \(AB\) is greater than arc \(CD\). Answer: C Choice B is very tempting !! I got it wrong But, thanks for the explanation.
_________________
It ain’t about how hard you hit. It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward; how much you can take and keep moving forward. That’s how winning is done!



Current Student
Joined: 02 Sep 2014
Posts: 89
Location: United States
GPA: 3.97

Re: M1325
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Jan 2016, 00:03
Statements (1) and (2) combined are sufficient. If ∠ ADB is acute and greater than ∠ CAD, then arc AB is greater than arc CD.
Can you elaborate on this? Also where do we use the fact that both arcs are < pi? I feel like this has some very complicated geometry involved. :S



Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Posts: 148
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GPA: 3.65
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)

Re: M1325
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Aug 2016, 06:01
Bunuel wrote: Official Solution: Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. These angles seem to define the lengths of arcs. The angles can come from different sides of the arc. On the images below you can see that both cases comply with the S2, but have different answers to the question. We need one more condition to define the arcs. Statements (1) and (2) combined are sufficient. If \(\angle\) ADB is acute and greater than \(\angle\) CAD, then arc \(AB\) is greater than arc \(CD\). Answer: C Hi Bunuel, Can you please explain how combining both statements will help in taking a decision that AB>CD ?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 48061

Re: M1325
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Aug 2016, 11:04



Intern
Joined: 19 Apr 2016
Posts: 1
Concentration: General Management, Leadership

Re: M1325
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Aug 2016, 01:50
Hi Bunuel,
Since x and y both are arcs and less than pie, and as radius is 1, hence both the arcs are less than a semi circle. Now combining this with ∠ADB>∠CAD, it means both are acute angles, because these could have been 90 degree if they would have been making a semicircle arc or larger if the arc would have been larger, but neither is the case. Hence the answer should be B.
Am I thinking right or missing something?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 48061

Re: M1325
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Aug 2016, 02:05



Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2017
Posts: 139

Re: M1325
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Jul 2018, 04:05
Bunuel wrote: Official Solution: Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. These angles seem to define the lengths of arcs. The angles can come from different sides of the arc. On the images below you can see that both cases comply with the S2, but have different answers to the question. We need one more condition to define the arcs. Statements (1) and (2) combined are sufficient. If \(\angle\) ADB is acute and greater than \(\angle\) CAD, then arc \(AB\) is greater than arc \(CD\). Answer: C Hi BUnuel, One doubt here how can we measure ADB whether it is obtuse or acute is there any property in circle. Especially in above two figures how the angle difference is spotted? Pls explain
_________________
If you like my post pls give kudos










