Jul 19 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT The Competition Continues  Game of Timers is a teambased competition based on solving GMAT questions to win epic prizes! Starting July 1st, compete to win prep materials while studying for GMAT! Registration is Open! Ends July 26th Jul 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Jul 21 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56272

Question Stats:
53% (01:10) correct 47% (01:23) wrong based on 138 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Is the range of a combined set \((S, T)\) is bigger than the sum of ranges of sets \(S\) and \(T\) ? (1) The largest element of \(T\) is bigger than the largest element of \(S\). (2) The smallest element of \(T\) is bigger than the largest element of \(S\).
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56272

Re M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2014, 00:50
Official Solution: The range of a set is the difference between the largest and smallest elements of a set. \(range_t=t_{max}t_{min}\); \(range_s=s_{max}s_{min}\); Question: \(range_{t \text{ and } s} \gt (t_{max}t_{min})+(s_{max}s_{min})\)? (1) The largest element of \(T\) is bigger than the largest element of \(S\). Given: \(t_{max} \gt s_{max}\), so the largest element of combined set is \(t_{max}\) but we still don't know which is the smallest element of combined set: If it's \(t_{min}\) then the question becomes is \(t_{max}t_{min} \gt t_{max}t_{min}+s_{max}s_{min}\). Or: is \(0 \gt s_{max}s_{min}\) and the answer would be NO; If it's \(s_{min}\) then the question becomes is \(t_{max}s_{min} \gt t_{max}t_{min}+s_{max}s_{min}\). Or: is \(t_{min} \gt s_{max}\) and the answer would be sometimes NO and sometimes YES. Not sufficient. (2) The smallest element of \(T\) is bigger than the largest element of \(S\). Given: \(t_{min} \gt s_{max}\), so the largest element of the combined set is \(t_{max}\) and the smallest element of the combined set is \(s_{min}\). So the question becomes is \(t_{max}s_{min} \gt t_{max}t_{min}+s_{max}s_{min}\). Or: is \(t_{min} \gt s_{max}\)? And that is given to be true, so the answer is YES. Sufficient. Answer: B
_________________



Manager
Joined: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 228
Location: India
GMAT Date: 04302015

Re: M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Oct 2014, 15:07
Is there any way, we can present the above statements with some examples?
Some other way in which we don't have to resort to variables such as tmax and tmin.



Intern
Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Posts: 21
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.68

Re: M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Oct 2014, 19:06
imagine the two sets as two line segments in a straight line. the lines can overlap each other, one inside another or be in different place altogether. to answer the question, we need to know if the lines overlap or there is a finite distance between them? The 1st point says the right end of line t is on the right side of right end of line s  this doesn't answer our question. The 2nd point says left end of line t is on the right side of right end of line s > there is a finite distance between the lines. We just got our answer



Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2016
Posts: 376
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.8
WE: Operations (Commercial Banking)

Re M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Aug 2016, 04:46
I think this is a highquality question and I agree with explanation.



Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2013
Posts: 7

Re: M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Oct 2016, 06:19
Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
The range of a set is the difference between the largest and smallest elements of a set. \(range_t=t_{max}t_{min}\); \(range_s=s_{max}s_{min}\); Question: \(range_{t \text{ and } s} \gt (t_{max}t_{min})+(s_{max}s_{min})\)? (1) The largest element of \(T\) is bigger than the largest element of \(S\). Given: \(t_{max} \gt s_{max}\), so the largest element of combined set is \(t_{max}\) but we still don't know which is the smallest element of combined set: If it's \(t_{min}\) then the question becomes is \(t_{max}t_{min} \gt t_{max}t_{min}+s_{max}s_{min}\). Or: is \(0 \gt s_{max}s_{min}\) and the answer would be NO; If it's \(s_{min}\) then the question becomes is \(t_{max}s_{min} \gt t_{max}t_{min}+s_{max}s_{min}\). Or: is \(t_{min} \gt s_{max}\) and the answer would be sometimes NO and sometimes YES. Not sufficient. (2) The smallest element of \(T\) is bigger than the largest element of \(S\). Given: \(t_{min} \gt s_{max}\), so the largest element of the combined set is \(t_{max}\) and the smallest element of the combined set is \(s_{min}\). So the question becomes is \(t_{max}s_{min} \gt t_{max}t_{min}+s_{max}s_{min}\). Or: is \(t_{min} \gt s_{max}\)? And that is given to be true, so the answer is YES. Sufficient.
Answer: B Hi Bunuel, Wont the hypothesis break down in the following screnario T=[1,2,3,4,5] S=[0,0,0,0] so the answer to the question would be "E" cannot be determined. Kindly let me know if i have misunderstood.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56272

Re: M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Oct 2016, 06:40
rt1601 wrote: Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
The range of a set is the difference between the largest and smallest elements of a set. \(range_t=t_{max}t_{min}\); \(range_s=s_{max}s_{min}\); Question: \(range_{t \text{ and } s} \gt (t_{max}t_{min})+(s_{max}s_{min})\)? (1) The largest element of \(T\) is bigger than the largest element of \(S\). Given: \(t_{max} \gt s_{max}\), so the largest element of combined set is \(t_{max}\) but we still don't know which is the smallest element of combined set: If it's \(t_{min}\) then the question becomes is \(t_{max}t_{min} \gt t_{max}t_{min}+s_{max}s_{min}\). Or: is \(0 \gt s_{max}s_{min}\) and the answer would be NO; If it's \(s_{min}\) then the question becomes is \(t_{max}s_{min} \gt t_{max}t_{min}+s_{max}s_{min}\). Or: is \(t_{min} \gt s_{max}\) and the answer would be sometimes NO and sometimes YES. Not sufficient. (2) The smallest element of \(T\) is bigger than the largest element of \(S\). Given: \(t_{min} \gt s_{max}\), so the largest element of the combined set is \(t_{max}\) and the smallest element of the combined set is \(s_{min}\). So the question becomes is \(t_{max}s_{min} \gt t_{max}t_{min}+s_{max}s_{min}\). Or: is \(t_{min} \gt s_{max}\)? And that is given to be true, so the answer is YES. Sufficient.
Answer: B Hi Bunuel, Wont the hypothesis break down in the following screnario T=[1,2,3,4,5] S=[0,0,0,0] so the answer to the question would be "E" cannot be determined. Kindly let me know if i have misunderstood. For this case you still have an YES answer to the question for (2). The range of combined set is 5 and the sum of the ranges of T and S is 4 + 0 = 4.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2016
Posts: 3

Re: M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Jun 2017, 21:52
what if s =( 2,3,40) & t= (41,41,41)



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56272

Re: M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jun 2017, 04:30
digvijay99 wrote: what if s =( 2,3,40) & t= (41,41,41) In this case the range of combined set would be 41  2 = 39 and the sum of the ranges of S and T would be 38 + 0 = 38. So, for (2) you'll get the same YES answer to the question, we've got in the solution. Does this make sense?
_________________



Intern
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 9

Re M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Mar 2018, 15:57
I think this is a highquality question and I agree with explanation.



Intern
Joined: 10 Jan 2018
Posts: 13
Location: United States (NY)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38 GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 3.36

Re: M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Apr 2018, 08:18
What about both S and T are single element set? Let S = {0} and T = {1} . T's smallest element is larger than S's biggest element . S and T can merge into {0,1} with range to be 1. The sum of the range of S and T is 1. So (2) is insufficient. What's wrong with this logic?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56272

Re: M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Apr 2018, 13:52
Canteenbottle wrote: What about both S and T are single element set? Let S = {0} and T = {1} . T's smallest element is larger than S's biggest element . S and T can merge into {0,1} with range to be 1. The sum of the range of S and T is 1. So (2) is insufficient. What's wrong with this logic? The range of a singleelement set is 0.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 15 May 2018
Posts: 8
GPA: 3.97
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

Re: M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jun 2018, 00:24
Let us take 2 sets: 1) S = {1,2,3} 2) T = {4,6}
This satisfies statement 2. Range of S = 2 Range of T = 2 Total = 4 Range of S,T = 5
It satisfies, so far so good.
Now take t ={4,5}, with S remaining same. Now Range of S,T is 4 and not greater than the sum. Answer should be (E) I believe



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56272

Re: M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jun 2018, 05:39
AkarshS wrote: Let us take 2 sets: 1) S = {1,2,3} 2) T = {4,6}
This satisfies statement 2. Range of S = 2 Range of T = 2 Total = 4 Range of S,T = 5
It satisfies, so far so good.
Now take t ={4,5}, with S remaining same. Now Range of S,T is 4 and not greater than the sum. Answer should be (E) I believe In case S = {1, 2, 3} and T = {4, 5}. The sum of ranges of sets S and T = 2 + 1 = 3, while the range of combined set is 4. So, you'd still have an YES answer. The correct answer to the question is B, as explained above.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 09 Jan 2018
Posts: 4

Re: M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Aug 2018, 07:41
What if it is a single set elements . It didnt talk about number of elements .



Intern
Joined: 03 May 2017
Posts: 4
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology

Re: M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Aug 2018, 03:56
Hi Bunuel, Let's say: S: 2 T: 4,6 Range of (S,T) will not be greater than individual ranges. Let;s say: S:1 T:7,9 Range of (S,T) will be greater than individual ranges. Please guide



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56272

Re: M1326
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Aug 2018, 04:47
Milind27 wrote: Hi Bunuel, Let's say: S: 2 T: 4,6 Range of (S,T) will not be greater than individual ranges. Let;s say: S:1 T:7,9 Range of (S,T) will be greater than individual ranges. Please guide S: 2 > range = 0 T: 4,6 > range = 2 Combined {2, 4, 6} > range = 4.
_________________










