Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49858

Question Stats:
78% (00:49) correct 22% (00:46) wrong based on 116 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49858




Intern
Joined: 20 Jun 2013
Posts: 8
Concentration: Finance
GMAT Date: 12202014
GPA: 3.71

Re: M1407
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Dec 2014, 12:08
Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statement (1) by itself is sufficient. S1 reduces to equation \(\frac{1}{J} + \frac{1}{2J} = \frac{1}{4}\), where \(J\) denotes the time it takes Jack to paint the wall alone. From this equation, \(J = 6\). Statement (2) by itself is sufficient. S2 reduces to equation \(\frac{1}{J} + 2*(\frac{1}{4}  \frac{1}{J}) = \frac{1}{3}\). \(\frac{1}{4}  \frac{1}{J}\) is Tom's actual painting speed. From this equation, \(J = 6\).
Answer: D For statement 2, I think the correct equation is 1/J + 2(1/4  1/J) = 1/3 That would yield J = 6.. what am I doing wrong here? Substituting equation for Tom into the given statement and solving..



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49858

Re: M1407
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Dec 2014, 12:30
codeblue wrote: Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statement (1) by itself is sufficient. S1 reduces to equation \(\frac{1}{J} + \frac{1}{2J} = \frac{1}{4}\), where \(J\) denotes the time it takes Jack to paint the wall alone. From this equation, \(J = 6\). Statement (2) by itself is sufficient. S2 reduces to equation \(\frac{1}{J} + 2*(\frac{1}{4}  \frac{1}{J}) = \frac{1}{3}\), where \(\frac{1}{4}  \frac{1}{J}\) is Tom's actual painting speed. From this equation, \(J = 6\).
Answer: D For statement 2, I think the correct equation is 1/J + 2(1/4  1/J) = 1/3 That would yield J = 6.. what am I doing wrong here? Substituting equation for Tom into the given statement and solving.. You have the same equation as above. Alternative explanation: If working together, brothers Tom and Jack can paint a wall in 4 hours, how much time would it take Jack to paint the wall alone?Say the rates of Tom and Jack are T job/hour and J job/hour, respectively. Their combined rate is T+J job/hour, and we are told that it equals to 1/4 job/hour. Thus given that T+J=1/4 job/hour. (1) Jack is painting twice as fast as Tom > J=2T > T+2T=1/4 > T=1/12 > J=2/12=1/6 > (time)=(reciprocal of rate)=6 hours. Sufficient. (2) If Tom painted twice as fast as he actually does, the brothers would finish the work in 3 hours. This statement implies that if the rate of Tom were 2T instead of T, the brothers combined rate would be 1/3 job/hour, thus 2T+J=1/3. Solving T+J=1/4 and 2T+J=1/3 gives J=1/6. Sufficient. Answer: D. Hope it helps.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Status: That which doesn't break me, makes me stronger.
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 31
Location: India
Concentration: Economics
GPA: 3.33
WE: Project Management (Consulting)

Re M1407
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Oct 2015, 06:05
I think this is a highquality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. The solution of statement 2 seems to be misguiding in the test analysis (but not in the forum post). Perhaps a 'comma' is required after 1/3 in the explanation of the second statement.
_________________
Thanks
Vishwa



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49858

Re: M1407
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Oct 2015, 08:54



Intern
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 6

Re: M1407
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Feb 2016, 04:59
Bunuel wrote: codeblue wrote: Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statement (1) by itself is sufficient. S1 reduces to equation \(\frac{1}{J} + \frac{1}{2J} = \frac{1}{4}\), where \(J\) denotes the time it takes Jack to paint the wall alone. From this equation, \(J = 6\). Statement (2) by itself is sufficient. S2 reduces to equation \(\frac{1}{J} + 2*(\frac{1}{4}  \frac{1}{J}) = \frac{1}{3}\), where \(\frac{1}{4}  \frac{1}{J}\) is Tom's actual painting speed. From this equation, \(J = 6\).
Answer: D For statement 2, I think the correct equation is 1/J + 2(1/4  1/J) = 1/3 That would yield J = 6.. what am I doing wrong here? Substituting equation for Tom into the given statement and solving.. You have the same equation as above. Alternative explanation: If working together, brothers Tom and Jack can paint a wall in 4 hours, how much time would it take Jack to paint the wall alone?Say the rates of Tom and Jack are T job/hour and J job/hour, respectively. Their combined rate is T+J job/hour, and we are told that it equals to 1/4 job/hour. Thus given that T+J=1/4 job/hour. (1) Jack is painting twice as fast as Tom > J=2T > T+2T=1/4 > T=1/12 > J=2/12=1/6 > (time)=(reciprocal of rate)=6 hours. Sufficient. (2) If Tom painted twice as fast as he actually does, the brothers would finish the work in 3 hours. This statement implies that if the rate of Tom were 2T instead of T, the brothers combined rate would be 1/3 job/hour, thus 2T+J=1/3. Solving T+J=1/4 and 2T+J=1/3 gives J=1/6. Sufficient. Answer: D. Hope it helps. Hi Bunuel, could you explain how you come to J=2/12? I think I am looking at it the wrong way, since I would come to the following calculation: J=2T > 1/T+1/(2T)=1/4 > 3/2T=1/4 > 2T=12 T=6. I am trying to turn my calculation around but still always get the same wrong answer. Thank you.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 6957

Erina89 wrote: Bunuel wrote: For statement 2, I think the correct equation is 1/J + 2(1/4  1/J) = 1/3
That would yield J = 6.. what am I doing wrong here? Substituting equation for Tom into the given statement and solving.. You have the same equation as above. Alternative explanation: If working together, brothers Tom and Jack can paint a wall in 4 hours, how much time would it take Jack to paint the wall alone?Say the rates of Tom and Jack are T job/hour and J job/hour, respectively. Their combined rate is T+J job/hour, and we are told that it equals to 1/4 job/hour. Thus given that T+J=1/4 job/hour. (1) Jack is painting twice as fast as Tom > J=2T > T+2T=1/4 > T=1/12 > J=2/12=1/6 > (time)=(reciprocal of rate)=6 hours. Sufficient. (2) If Tom painted twice as fast as he actually does, the brothers would finish the work in 3 hours. This statement implies that if the rate of Tom were 2T instead of T, the brothers combined rate would be 1/3 job/hour, thus 2T+J=1/3. Solving T+J=1/4 and 2T+J=1/3 gives J=1/6. Sufficient. Answer: D. Hope it helps. Quote: Hi Bunuel,
could you explain how you come to J=2/12? I think I am looking at it the wrong way, since I would come to the following calculation: J=2T > 1/T+1/(2T)=1/4 > 3/2T=1/4 > 2T=12 T=6.
I am trying to turn my calculation around but still always get the same wrong answer.
Thank you. Hi, before Bunuel puts in his bit, let me tell you where are you going wrong.. its not J=2T, but T=2J..
(1) Jack is painting twice as fast as Tom > if you are talking of time taken as J and T then T=2J, as speed of J is twice that of T.. If you are taking J and T as speed, then J=2T..
since you are talking of the Equation 1/T+1/(2T).. you are taking T and J as the time taken, then T=2J.
so eq will be 1/J + 1/2J.. Redo and you will get the answer
_________________
1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolutemodulusabetterunderstanding210849.html#p1622372 2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html 3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effectsofarithmeticoperationsonfractions269413.html
GMAT online Tutor



Intern
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 6

Re: M1407
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Feb 2016, 07:28
Thank you. I knew I somehow looked at it the wrong way...



Study Buddy Forum Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1208
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)

Re: M1407
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Dec 2017, 15:21
chetan2u wrote: Erina89 wrote: Bunuel wrote: For statement 2, I think the correct equation is 1/J + 2(1/4  1/J) = 1/3
That would yield J = 6.. what am I doing wrong here? Substituting equation for Tom into the given statement and solving.. You have the same equation as above. Alternative explanation: If working together, brothers Tom and Jack can paint a wall in 4 hours, how much time would it take Jack to paint the wall alone?Say the rates of Tom and Jack are T job/hour and J job/hour, respectively. Their combined rate is T+J job/hour, and we are told that it equals to 1/4 job/hour. Quote: [b]Hi, before Bunuel puts in his bit, let me tell you where are you going wrong.. its not J=2T, but T=2J.. chetan2uBut in the alternate explanation given by Bunuel above he mentions J = 2T
_________________
It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.










