Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

54% (01:22) correct
46% (01:15) wrong based on 76 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The sequence \(a_1\), \(a_2\), ... is defined such that \(a_{n}=\frac{a_{n-1}}{n}\) for all \(n \gt 1\). How many terms of the sequence are greater than \(\frac{1}{2}\)?

Basically we have a sequence of numbers which is defined with some formula. For example: \(a_{2}=\frac{a_{1}}{2}\), \(a_{3}=\frac{a_{2}}{3}\), \(a_{4}=\frac{a_{3}}{4}\), ... The question asks: how many numbers from the sequence are greater than \(\frac{1}{2}\). Notice that if we knew ANY term of the sequence we would be able to get all the other terms/numbers and thus answer the question.

(1) \(a_2=5\). As discussed above this statement is sufficient as we can write down all the terms. For example: \(a_{2}=\frac{a_{1}}{2}=5\), which gives \(a_1=10\). \(a_{3}=\frac{a_{2}}{3}=\frac{5}{3}\), and so on.

(2) \(a_1-a_2=5\). Substitute: \(a_1-\frac{a_{1}}{2}=5\). We can solve for \(a_1\) and thus will have the same case of knowing one term. Sufficient.

There is a mistake in the problem. Since we are asked how many terms are >1/2 we need to know the number of terms in the sequence? Because of this i marked E

There is a mistake in the problem. Since we are asked how many terms are >1/2 we need to know the number of terms in the sequence? Because of this i marked E

The question is correct. Please re-read the solution: "Notice that if we knew ANY term of the sequence we would be able to get all the other terms/numbers and thus answer the question."
_________________

There is a mistake in the problem. Since we are asked how many terms are >1/2 we need to know the number of terms in the sequence? Because of this i marked E

The question is correct. Please re-read the solution: "Notice that if we knew ANY term of the sequence we would be able to get all the other terms/numbers and thus answer the question."

Hello Bunuel

Even I have the same doubt.

This is a value DS question and to answer this we should know THE EXACT NUMBER OF TERMS IN THIS SEQUENCE greater than 1/2. But even if we find all the terms of the sequence as you said, we still can't answer how many terms are there EXACTLY.

There is a mistake in the problem. Since we are asked how many terms are >1/2 we need to know the number of terms in the sequence? Because of this i marked E

The question is correct. Please re-read the solution: "Notice that if we knew ANY term of the sequence we would be able to get all the other terms/numbers and thus answer the question."

Hello Bunuel

Even I have the same doubt.

This is a value DS question and to answer this we should know THE EXACT NUMBER OF TERMS IN THIS SEQUENCE greater than 1/2. But even if we find all the terms of the sequence as you said, we still can't answer how many terms are there EXACTLY.

Please guide.

Thanks.

Try to solve the way proposed in the solution and you'll get EXACT number of terms which are greater than 1/2.
_________________

Basically we have a sequence of numbers which is defined with some formula. For example: \(a_{2}=\frac{a_{1}}{2}\), \(a_{3}=\frac{a_{2}}{3}\), \(a_{4}=\frac{a_{3}}{4}\), ... The question asks: how many numbers from the sequence are greater than \(\frac{1}{2}\). Notice that if we knew ANY term of the sequence we would be able to get all the other terms/numbers and thus answer the question.

(1) \(a_2=5\). As discussed above this statement is sufficient as we can write down all the terms. For example: \(a_{2}=\frac{a_{1}}{2}=5\), which gives \(a_1=10\). \(a_{3}=\frac{a_{2}}{3}=\frac{5}{3}\), and so on.

(2) \(a_1-a_2=5\). Substitute: \(a_1-\frac{a_{1}}{2}=5\). We can solve for \(a_1\) and thus will have the same case of knowing one term. Sufficient.

Answer: D

Can anybody reply how can we get the value of n here?

Basically we have a sequence of numbers which is defined with some formula. For example: \(a_{2}=\frac{a_{1}}{2}\), \(a_{3}=\frac{a_{2}}{3}\), \(a_{4}=\frac{a_{3}}{4}\), ... The question asks: how many numbers from the sequence are greater than \(\frac{1}{2}\). Notice that if we knew ANY term of the sequence we would be able to get all the other terms/numbers and thus answer the question.

(1) \(a_2=5\). As discussed above this statement is sufficient as we can write down all the terms. For example: \(a_{2}=\frac{a_{1}}{2}=5\), which gives \(a_1=10\). \(a_{3}=\frac{a_{2}}{3}=\frac{5}{3}\), and so on.

(2) \(a_1-a_2=5\). Substitute: \(a_1-\frac{a_{1}}{2}=5\). We can solve for \(a_1\) and thus will have the same case of knowing one term. Sufficient.

Answer: D

Can anybody reply how can we get the value of n here?

n is an index there. So, \(a_n\) is nth term of the sequence.
_________________

Had the question instead been: "is the arithmetic mean of this sequence greater than 1/2?", would D still be the correct answer choice?

If NOT, kindly explain difference between the two questions. Also if possible, pls share any more examples which have M15-03's format (i.e. statements are sufficient because they provide the tools to solve if an additional variable -- in this case, last term in sequence -- was hypothetically provided).

Had the question instead been: "is the arithmetic mean of this sequence greater than 1/2?", would D still be the correct answer choice?

If NOT, kindly explain difference between the two questions. Also if possible, pls share any more examples which have M15-03's format (i.e. statements are sufficient because they provide the tools to solve if an additional variable -- in this case, last term in sequence -- was hypothetically provided).

Thank you

The mean = (the sum of the terms)/(the number of the terms). We don't know neither of those, so the answer will be E.

Now I'm confused. Your initial solution said "...Notice that if we knew ANY term of the sequence we would be able to get all the other terms/numbers and thus answer the question."

Could you please explain how being able to determine all the other terms in the sequence from ANY term doesn't also enable one to determine the arithmetic mean, hypothetically speaking? Like what is the difference in sufficiency logic between both questions? Thanks

Bunuel wrote:

ulysses02 wrote:

Hi Bunuel,

Had the question instead been: "is the arithmetic mean of this sequence greater than 1/2?", would D still be the correct answer choice?

If NOT, kindly explain difference between the two questions. Also if possible, pls share any more examples which have M15-03's format (i.e. statements are sufficient because they provide the tools to solve if an additional variable -- in this case, last term in sequence -- was hypothetically provided).

Thank you

The mean = (the sum of the terms)/(the number of the terms). We don't know neither of those, so the answer will be E.

Now I'm confused. Your initial solution said "...Notice that if we knew ANY term of the sequence we would be able to get all the other terms/numbers and thus answer the question."

Could you please explain how being able to determine all the other terms in the sequence from ANY term doesn't also enable one to determine the arithmetic mean, hypothetically speaking? Like what is the difference in sufficiency logic between both questions? Thanks

Bunuel wrote:

ulysses02 wrote:

Hi Bunuel,

Had the question instead been: "is the arithmetic mean of this sequence greater than 1/2?", would D still be the correct answer choice?

If NOT, kindly explain difference between the two questions. Also if possible, pls share any more examples which have M15-03's format (i.e. statements are sufficient because they provide the tools to solve if an additional variable -- in this case, last term in sequence -- was hypothetically provided).

Thank you

The mean = (the sum of the terms)/(the number of the terms). We don't know neither of those, so the answer will be E.

Yes, we can get any term of the sequence but we won't know how many terms in the sequence are there. For example, if we knew that there are 10 terms or 100 terms or 234 terms, then we could get the mean but if we don't know how many terms are there then how are we going to find the mean?
_________________