Jul 16 03:00 PM PDT  04:00 PM PDT Join a free live webinar and find out which skills will get you to the top, and what you can do to develop them. Save your spot today! Tuesday, July 16th at 3 pm PST Jul 16 08:00 PM EDT  09:00 PM EDT Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Tuesday, July 16th at 8 pm EDT Jul 19 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT The Competition Continues  Game of Timers is a teambased competition based on solving GMAT questions to win epic prizes! Starting July 1st, compete to win prep materials while studying for GMAT! Registration is Open! Ends July 26th Jul 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Jul 21 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56244

Question Stats:
52% (01:14) correct 48% (01:18) wrong based on 452 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
The ratio of the number of employees of three companies X, Y and Z is 3:4:8, respectively. Is the average age of all employees in these companies less than 40 years? (1) The total age of all the employees in these companies is 600. (2) The average age employees in X, Y, and Z, is 40, 20, and 50, respectively.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56244

Re M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2014, 01:23
Official Solution: Given that the ratio of the number of employees is \(3x:4x:8x\), for some positive multiple \(x\). The questions asks whether \((average \ age)=\frac{(total \ age)}{(number \ of \ employees)} \lt 40\), or whether \(\frac{(total \ age)}{3x+4x+8x} \lt 40\), which is the same as: is \((total \ age) \lt 600x\)? (1) The total age of all the employees in these companies is 600. The question becomes: is \(600 \lt 600x\)? Or is \(1 \lt x\). We don't know that: if \(x=1\), then the answer is NO but if \(x \gt 1\), then the answer is YES. Not sufficient. (2) The average age employees in X, Y, and Z, is 40, 20, and 50, respectively. \((total \ age)=40*3x+20*4x+50*8x=600x\), so the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient. Answer: B
_________________



Intern
Joined: 28 Aug 2014
Posts: 9

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Oct 2014, 00:50
I didnt get the solution right! can you elaborate more with any other example.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56244

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Oct 2014, 04:13
sriharsha63 wrote: I didnt get the solution right! can you elaborate more with any other example. You have to specify what part was unclear for you.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 28 Aug 2014
Posts: 9

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Oct 2014, 04:20
the second statement in particular; (2) The average age employees in X, Y, and Z, is 40, 20, and 50, respectively. (total \ age)=40*3x+20*4x+50*8x=600x, so the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.
we cannot find the answer from this statement, so how come we say its sufficient.
i opted for E because its not possible to get a single solution from both the statements.
how come the answer is B?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56244

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Oct 2014, 04:28
sriharsha63 wrote: the second statement in particular; (2) The average age employees in X, Y, and Z, is 40, 20, and 50, respectively. (total \ age)=40*3x+20*4x+50*8x=600x, so the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.
we cannot find the answer from this statement, so how come we say its sufficient.
i opted for E because its not possible to get a single solution from both the statements.
how come the answer is B? This is an Yes/No DS question. In a Yes/No Data Sufficiency questions, statement(s) is sufficient if the answer is “always yes” or “always no” while a statement(s) is insufficient if the answer is "sometimes yes" and "sometimes no". The question asks: is the average age of all employees in these companies less than 40 years? As shown in the solution this is the same as asking is \((total \ age) \lt 600x\)? The second statement says that \((total \ age)=600x\), thus the asnwer to the question is NO. Hope it's clear.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 28 Aug 2014
Posts: 9

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Oct 2014, 05:21
thanks Bunuel, it makes sense now. I wasnt aware about the yes/no DS question!!



Intern
Joined: 15 Jul 2014
Posts: 9

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Oct 2014, 22:11
(1) The total age of all the employees in these companies is 600. The question becomes: is 600 \lt 600x? Or is 1 \lt x. We don't know that: if x=1, then the answer is NO but if x \gt 1, then the answer is YES. Not sufficient.
I dont understand why you ruled out Statement 1. We know that x>1 since there is a given ratio for the employees. isnt that sufficient?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56244

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Oct 2014, 23:58
kritiu wrote: (1) The total age of all the employees in these companies is 600. The question becomes: is 600 \lt 600x? Or is 1 \lt x. We don't know that: if x=1, then the answer is NO but if x \gt 1, then the answer is YES. Not sufficient.
I dont understand why you ruled out Statement 1. We know that x>1 since there is a given ratio for the employees. isnt that sufficient? We don't know whether x > 1. The ratio could be 3:4:8, which is if x = 1.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 10

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Dec 2014, 10:45
I did this way B) The ratio of the employees are 3:4:8 and the average age are 40,20 and 50. If you look, more no. of people are above 40 years old. So obviously average will be greater than 40 so the answer has to be N0. B is the answer Bunuel wrote: kritiu wrote: (1) The total age of all the employees in these companies is 600. The question becomes: is 600 \lt 600x? Or is 1 \lt x. We don't know that: if x=1, then the answer is NO but if x \gt 1, then the answer is YES. Not sufficient.
I dont understand why you ruled out Statement 1. We know that x>1 since there is a given ratio for the employees. isnt that sufficient? We don't know whether x > 1. The ratio could be 3:4:8, which is if x = 1.



Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 181
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT Date: 11232015
GPA: 3.6
WE: Science (Other)

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Nov 2015, 07:07
Hello Bunuel,
Don't you think OA needs to be edited for this question:
Question Stem:
The ratio of the number of employees of three companies X, Y and Z is 3:4:8, respectively. Is the average age of all employees in these companies less than 40 years?
Analysis:
Ratio of number of employees: X : Y: Z 3x: 4x: 8x = 15x  (A)
Age Average/Individual: Unknown
Is average age less than 40????
Statements are as follows:
(1) The total age of all the employees in these companies is 600
Average age = Total age/ N
Here N needs to be at least 15 because X can not be less than 01. So 600/15 =40
Hence average age needs to be 40 or more.
Answer to the question "Is the average age of all employees in these companies less than 40 years" is obviously NO.
(2) The average age employees in X, Y, and Z, is 40, 20, and 50, respectively.
Analysis for this statement already done by you.
So the answer to this question needs to be D.
Please suggest that whether my analysis for statement 01 is correct.
Thanks



Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2015
Posts: 2

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Nov 2015, 20:56
The x can't small than 1 right? the # of people at each company has to be integer...



Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 181
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT Date: 11232015
GPA: 3.6
WE: Science (Other)

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Nov 2015, 22:28
Right, that's what make statement 01 sufficient I guess



Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 371
Location: France
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38 GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
WE: Real Estate (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2015, 06:26
WillGetIt wrote: Right, that's what make statement 01 sufficient I guess For statement 1, the average is only 40 if there are 15 people, hence Bunuel's x = 1. But if x = 2 the number of employees is no longer 15 but 3(2):4(2):8(2) = 30 Then the average will be 600/30 = 20 so statement 1 is insufficient
_________________



Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 371
Location: France
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38 GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
WE: Real Estate (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2015, 06:30
WillGetIt wrote: Hello Bunuel,
Don't you think OA needs to be edited for this question:
Question Stem:
The ratio of the number of employees of three companies X, Y and Z is 3:4:8, respectively. Is the average age of all employees in these companies less than 40 years?
Analysis:
Ratio of number of employees: X : Y: Z 3x: 4x: 8x = 15x  (A)
Age Average/Individual: Unknown
Is average age less than 40????
Statements are as follows:
(1) The total age of all the employees in these companies is 600
Average age = Total age/ N
Here N needs to be at least 15 because X can not be less than 01. So 600/15 =40
Hence average age needs to be 40 or moreLESS.
Answer to the question "Is the average age of all employees in these companies less than 40 years" is obviously NO MAYBE.
(2) The average age employees in X, Y, and Z, is 40, 20, and 50, respectively.
Analysis for this statement already done by you.
So the answer to this question needs to be D.
Please suggest that whether my analysis for statement 01 is correct.
Thanks For statement 1, the average is only 40 if there are 15 people, hence Bunuel's x = 1. But if x = 2 the number of employees is no longer 15 but 3(2):4(2):8(2) = 30 Then the average will be 600/30 = 20 so statement 1 is insufficient
_________________



Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2012
Posts: 6

Given that the ratio of the number of employees is 3x:4x:8x3x:4x:8x, for some positive multiple xx.
The questions asks whether (average age)=(total age)(number of employees)<40(average age)=(total age)(number of employees)<40, or whether (total age)3x+4x+8x<40(total age)3x+4x+8x<40, which is the same as: is (total age)<600x(total age)<600x?
(1) The total age of all the employees in these companies is 600. The question becomes: is 600<600x600<600x? Or is 1<x1<x. We don't know that: if x=1x=1, then the answer is NO but if x>1x>1, then the answer is YES. Not sufficient.
(2) The average age employees in X, Y, and Z, is 40, 20, and 50, respectively. (total age)=40∗3x+20∗4x+50∗8x=600x(total age)=40∗3x+20∗4x+50∗8x=600x, so the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.
My solution  1) not sufficient 2) lets take minimum ratio 3:4:8 total age= 3*40+4*20+8*50 =600 so average= 600 /15 =40 (for minimum ratio) 40 is not less than 40 wrong
take next ratio multiplied by 2 lets take minimum ratio 6:8:16 then we get ratio < 40 correct two different solutions so answer is E even if we combine both two cases 1 &2 Please correct me if i am wrong



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56244

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Jan 2017, 01:33
ashokingmat wrote: Given that the ratio of the number of employees is 3x:4x:8x3x:4x:8x, for some positive multiple xx.
The questions asks whether (average age)=(total age)(number of employees)<40(average age)=(total age)(number of employees)<40, or whether (total age)3x+4x+8x<40(total age)3x+4x+8x<40, which is the same as: is (total age)<600x(total age)<600x?
(1) The total age of all the employees in these companies is 600. The question becomes: is 600<600x600<600x? Or is 1<x1<x. We don't know that: if x=1x=1, then the answer is NO but if x>1x>1, then the answer is YES. Not sufficient.
(2) The average age employees in X, Y, and Z, is 40, 20, and 50, respectively. (total age)=40∗3x+20∗4x+50∗8x=600x(total age)=40∗3x+20∗4x+50∗8x=600x, so the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.
My solution  1) not sufficient 2) lets take minimum ratio 3:4:8 total age= 3*40+4*20+8*50 =600 so average= 600 /15 =40 (for minimum ratio) 40 is not less than 40 wrong
take next ratio multiplied by 2 lets take minimum ratio 6:8:16 then we get ratio < 40 correct two different solutions so answer is E even if we combine both two cases 1 &2 Please correct me if i am wrong How did you get the red part? (40∗6+20∗8+50∗16)/(6 + 8 + 16) = 40, not less than 40.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2017
Posts: 5
Location: India
GPA: 2.8

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jul 2017, 03:45
Hi. Why is the first statement insufficient? We basically have been given total age. Dividing that with the sum of ratio given is enough to deduce that the avg age of all employees = 40 yrs.
I answered it as D.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56244

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jul 2017, 06:15
maryamtheleadr wrote: Hi. Why is the first statement insufficient? We basically have been given total age. Dividing that with the sum of ratio given is enough to deduce that the avg age of all employees = 40 yrs.
I answered it as D. If \(x=1\) (so if the number of employees is 15), then the answer is NO but if \(x \gt 1\) (so if the number of employees is 30, 45, ...), then the answer is YES.
_________________



Senior Manager
Joined: 31 May 2017
Posts: 348

Re: M2518
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Mar 2018, 17:57
Interesting question. I answered D assuming the number of employees as 15 i.e x=1 in the first option. Now i get what i missed to consider. Correct answer is B
_________________







Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 21 posts ]



