Last visit was: 14 Dec 2024, 09:38 It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 09:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
zoezhuyan
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 432
Own Kudos:
86
 []
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 432
Kudos: 86
 []
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,485
Own Kudos:
29,387
 []
Given Kudos: 130
Expert reply
Posts: 4,485
Kudos: 29,387
 []
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
zoezhuyan
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 432
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 432
Kudos: 86
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,485
Own Kudos:
29,387
 []
Given Kudos: 130
Expert reply
Posts: 4,485
Kudos: 29,387
 []
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zoezhuyan
Hi mikemcgarry,
Aha ... so if "when + compared" is incorrect, it is because the structure is not sensible clause, instead of idiomatical error.

Did I get it ?

BTW, as your example "even when comparing with sales in previous Novembers"
Would you please give me an example when "even when comparing with sales in previous Novembers"
is correct.

I looked up dictionary, I found there is an idiom that use "compared with / to" , there is no "comparing with/ to".

Thanks in advance

Have a nice day.
>_~
Dear zoezhuyan,

How are you, my friend? I'm happy to respond. :-)

Yes. In general, I would say that "when" + [participle] or "although" + [participle] would be correct only if an implied pronoun & helping verb pair can be construed to complete the clause. This is a fundamental grammar issue and has absolutely nothing to do with idioms.

Any present participle only could be right after "when" or "although" if the subject matter of the sentence is in the present tense and the doer of the action of the participle is the subject. It would be correct in a somewhat contrived sentence:
US federal law mandates that all employers be completely objective when comparing candidates of different ethnic backgrounds.
Because the present participle is active, the only time this would be used would be to describe the action of comparing. The past participle is a passive participle, so that can modify the objects compared.

There still is an idiom for the active participle "comparing" and even the verb "to compare," but these are rare.
He likes to compare his friends to characters in Shakespeare, but he compares himself with Milton.
The passive participle, "compared," is used 1000X more frequently than either the verb or the active participle.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
vishalkumar4mba
Joined: 27 Nov 2016
Last visit: 11 Sep 2017
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GPA: 2.71
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 40
Kudos: 106
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zoezhuyan
Hi mikemcgarry ,

How are you?

Recently, I read Magoosh ebook of idiom,
I got a note, on the bottom of Page 10, that Also, adding the word “when” before the word “compared” is always 100% wrong.
when I read the note, I recalled a sentence from OG16 SC # 116, ( if I post a wrong session, please tell me, I will re-post it.)

November is traditionally the strongest month for sales of light trucks, but sales this past November, even when compared with sales in previous Novembers, accounted for a remarkably large share of total vehicle sales.
(A) but sales this past November, even when compared with sales in previous Novembers, -- credit answer
(B) but even when it is compared with previous Novembers, this past November’s sales
(C) but even when they are compared with previous Novembers, sales of light trucks this past November
(D) so that compared with previous Novembers, sales of light trucks this past November
(E) so that this past November’s sales, even compared with previous Novembers’ sales,

I can get that the comparison in the SC is sales in this past November VS sales in previous Novembers,
Also, I found there is a word "WHEN" before "compared", this case seems against the note from Magoosh ebook idiom -- Also, adding the word “when” before the word “compared” is always 100% wrong.

I think I must miss something, but I have no idea what I missed.

Would you please clarify ?

thanks in advance

have a nice day
>_~


Another thing , So that changes the meaning.

Again in option b & c there is comparison error.
User avatar
zoezhuyan
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 432
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 432
Kudos: 86
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
Dear zoezhuyan,

How are you, my friend? I'm happy to respond. :-)

Yes. In general, I would say that "when" + [participle] or "although" + [participle] would be correct only if an implied pronoun & helping verb pair can be construed to complete the clause. This is a fundamental grammar issue and has absolutely nothing to do with idioms.

Any present participle only could be right after "when" or "although" if the subject matter of the sentence is in the present tense and the doer of the action of the participle is the subject. It would be correct in a somewhat contrived sentence:
US federal law mandates that all employers be completely objective when comparing candidates of different ethnic backgrounds.
Because the present participle is active, the only time this would be used would be to describe the action of comparing. The past participle is a passive participle, so that can modify the objects compared.

There still is an idiom for the active participle "comparing" and even the verb "to compare," but these are rare.
He likes to compare his friends to characters in Shakespeare, but he compares himself with Milton.
The passive participle, "compared," is used 1000X more frequently than either the verb or the active participle.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)

Hi mikemcgarry
Thanks so much for your excellent explanation

Have a nice day
>_~