Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 02:42 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 02:42
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
555-605 Level|   Strengthen|      
User avatar
Sash143
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2015
Last visit: 26 Jul 2022
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
744
 [25]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 62
Kudos: 744
 [25]
Many banks charge high penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts for 14 Nov 2016, 11:34
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
21
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

80% (02:04) correct 20% (02:21) wrong based on 1186 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Many banks charge high penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts for relatively small violations of policies that are often confusingly presented to customers. These fees do not merely compensate the banks for the trivial cost and inconvenience of these violations; the fees provide enough income to allow the banks to offer free checking accounts, which do not generate interest. If checking accounts were charged a nominal annual fee, high penalty fees would be eliminated.

Which of the following would most strengthen the argument above?


A) A recent study has shown that fewer than 1% of bank customers read all the fine print on the information with which they are presented when they open an account.

B) There is widespread perception among the general public that penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts and lines of credit are unfairly high.

C) Bank customers will not close their checking accounts if a nominal annual fee is charged to the account.

D) The cost to banks of maintaining checking accounts is expected to rise considerably because of added security expenses.

E) Consumers would not pay most of their bills through online services rather than using their existing checking accounts.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
C
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,395
Own Kudos:
5,122
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 1,395
Kudos: 5,122
 [1]
Many banks charge high penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts for 14 Nov 2016, 23:14
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We have to strengthen the idea that charging checking accounts would eliminate high penalty fees.

A) A recent study has shown that fewer than 1% of bank customers read all the fine print on the information with which they are presented when they open an account. - Incorrect. Irrelevant.

B) There is widespread perception among the general public that penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts and lines of credit are unfairly high. - Incorrect. Does not affect the argument.

C) Bank customers will not close their checking accounts if a nominal annual fee is charged to the account. - Correct. Supports the argument. If checking accounts are not closed enough revenue would flow into the bank and penal fee can be eliminated.

D) The cost to banks of maintaining checking accounts is expected to rise considerably because of added security expenses. - Incorrect. Opposite.

E) Consumers would not pay most of their bills through online services rather than using their existing checking accounts. - Incorrect. The relationship between online services and checking accounts is not stated in the argument and hence we cannot arrive at a definitive conclusion. Out of scope.

Answer: C
User avatar
Sash143
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2015
Last visit: 26 Jul 2022
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
744
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 62
Kudos: 744
Many banks charge high penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts for 15 Nov 2016, 02:17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vyshak
We have to strengthen the idea that charging checking accounts would eliminate high penalty fees.

A) A recent study has shown that fewer than 1% of bank customers read all the fine print on the information with which they are presented when they open an account. - Incorrect. Irrelevant.

B) There is widespread perception among the general public that penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts and lines of credit are unfairly high. - Incorrect. Does not affect the argument.

C) Bank customers will not close their checking accounts if a nominal annual fee is charged to the account. - Correct. Supports the argument. If checking accounts are not closed enough revenue would flow into the bank and penal fee can be eliminated.
D) The cost to banks of maintaining checking accounts is expected to rise considerably because of added security expenses. - Incorrect. Opposite.

E) Consumers would not pay most of their bills through online services rather than using their existing checking accounts. - Incorrect. The relationship between online services and checking accounts is not stated in the argument and hence we cannot arrive at a definitive conclusion. Out of scope.

Answer: C
Show more


The argument says "the fees provide enough income to allow the banks to offer free checking accounts, which do not generate interest". Per your reasoning if checking accounts are not closed how will the revenue flow since checking accounts would not generate any interest. Furthermore, if nominal fee is charged charging account how will this have a direct impact on the elimination?


Please correct me if Im wrong!
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,395
Own Kudos:
5,122
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 1,395
Kudos: 5,122
Many banks charge high penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts for 15 Nov 2016, 02:42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sash143
Vyshak
We have to strengthen the idea that charging checking accounts would eliminate high penalty fees.

A) A recent study has shown that fewer than 1% of bank customers read all the fine print on the information with which they are presented when they open an account. - Incorrect. Irrelevant.

B) There is widespread perception among the general public that penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts and lines of credit are unfairly high. - Incorrect. Does not affect the argument.

C) Bank customers will not close their checking accounts if a nominal annual fee is charged to the account. - Correct. Supports the argument. If checking accounts are not closed enough revenue would flow into the bank and penal fee can be eliminated.
D) The cost to banks of maintaining checking accounts is expected to rise considerably because of added security expenses. - Incorrect. Opposite.

E) Consumers would not pay most of their bills through online services rather than using their existing checking accounts. - Incorrect. The relationship between online services and checking accounts is not stated in the argument and hence we cannot arrive at a definitive conclusion. Out of scope.

Answer: C


The argument says "the fees provide enough income to allow the banks to offer free checking accounts, which do not generate interest". Per your reasoning if checking accounts are not closed how will the revenue flow since checking accounts would not generate any interest. Furthermore, if nominal fee is charged charging account how will this have a direct impact on the elimination?


Please correct me if Im wrong!
Show more

Hi,

Here the revenue is through annual fee that is imposed on every checking account. Moreover the interest earned goes to the customer and not to the bank. Interest free accounts put the bank at an advantage.

The argument states that nominal fee is helpful to eliminate the penal fee. You are supposed to strengthen the argument rather than to find out how it will eliminate the penalty fee.
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
7,148
 [2]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 7,148
 [2]
Many banks charge high penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts for 15 Nov 2016, 03:16
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sash143
Many banks charge high penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts for relatively small violations of policies that are often confusingly presented to customers. These fees do not merely compensate the banks for the trivial cost and inconvenience of these violations; the fees provide enough income to allow the banks to offer free checking accounts, which do not generate interest. If checking accounts were charged a nominal annual fee, high penalty fees would be eliminated.

Which of the following would most strengthen the argument above?
Show more
A) A recent study has shown that fewer than 1% of bank customers read all the fine print on the information with which they are presented when they open an account.
Out of scope. This information does not provide any information support or against the argument. Eliminated

B) There is widespread perception among the general public that penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts and lines of credit are unfairly high.
Yes, the fees are so high, so what? Eliminated

C) Bank customers will not close their checking accounts if a nominal annual fee is charged to the account.
If the bank apply checking account fee on bank customers, bank customers will not close their checking accounts, so the bank will not lose their customers. Also, this annual fee is high enough to cover the checking account cost, so the bank could eliminate the high penalty fees. Hence, this choice clearly support the argument.

D) The cost to banks of maintaining checking accounts is expected to rise considerably because of added security expenses.
Yes, this cost is expected to rise, so what? Eliminated

E) Consumers would not pay most of their bills through online services rather than using their existing checking accounts.
Eliminated, since this choice isnot relevent to the argument
User avatar
Sash143
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2015
Last visit: 26 Jul 2022
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
744
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 62
Kudos: 744
Many banks charge high penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts for 15 Nov 2016, 04:17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vyshak
Sash143
Vyshak
We have to strengthen the idea that charging checking accounts would eliminate high penalty fees.

A) A recent study has shown that fewer than 1% of bank customers read all the fine print on the information with which they are presented when they open an account. - Incorrect. Irrelevant.

B) There is widespread perception among the general public that penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts and lines of credit are unfairly high. - Incorrect. Does not affect the argument.

C) Bank customers will not close their checking accounts if a nominal annual fee is charged to the account. - Correct. Supports the argument. If checking accounts are not closed enough revenue would flow into the bank and penal fee can be eliminated.
D) The cost to banks of maintaining checking accounts is expected to rise considerably because of added security expenses. - Incorrect. Opposite.

E) Consumers would not pay most of their bills through online services rather than using their existing checking accounts. - Incorrect. The relationship between online services and checking accounts is not stated in the argument and hence we cannot arrive at a definitive conclusion. Out of scope.

Answer: C


The argument says "the fees provide enough income to allow the banks to offer free checking accounts, which do not generate interest". Per your reasoning if checking accounts are not closed how will the revenue flow since checking accounts would not generate any interest. Furthermore, if nominal fee is charged charging account how will this have a direct impact on the elimination?


Please correct me if Im wrong!

Hi,

Here the revenue is through annual fee that is imposed on every checking account. Moreover the interest earned goes to the customer and not to the bank. Interest free accounts put the bank at an advantage.

The argument states that nominal fee is helpful to eliminate the penal fee. You are supposed to strengthen the argument rather than to find out how it will eliminate the penalty fee.
Show more


Thanks for that explanation! Crystal clear
avatar
Shiv2016
avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Last visit: 14 Aug 2024
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
211
Given Kudos: 277
Posts: 516
Kudos: 211
Many banks charge high penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts for 03 Dec 2016, 03:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise: Many banks charge high penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts for relatively small violations of policies that are often confusingly presented to customers.
Premise: These fees do not merely compensate the banks for the trivial cost and inconvenience of these violations; the fees provide enough income to allow the banks to offer free checking accounts, which do not generate interest.

Conclusion: If checking accounts were charged a nominal annual fee, high penalty fees would be eliminated.

If it happens what is stated in the conclusion then the author assumes that customers who use checking accounts would use them even after the implementation.

Choice C exactly states this. Therefore CORRECT.
User avatar
itisSheldon
User avatar
Joined: 03 Mar 2018
Last visit: 26 Jan 2022
Posts: 161
Own Kudos:
669
 [1]
Given Kudos: 101
Posts: 161
Kudos: 669
 [1]
Many banks charge high penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts for 21 Dec 2018, 07:45
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sash143
Many banks charge high penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts for relatively small violations of policies that are often confusingly presented to customers. These fees do not merely compensate the banks for the trivial cost and inconvenience of these violations; the fees provide enough income to allow the banks to offer free checking accounts, which do not generate interest. If checking accounts were charged a nominal annual fee, high penalty fees would be eliminated.

Which of the following would most strengthen the argument above?


A) A recent study has shown that fewer than 1% of bank customers read all the fine print on the information with which they are presented when they open an account.

B) There is widespread perception among the general public that penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts and lines of credit are unfairly high.

C) Bank customers will not close their checking accounts if a nominal annual fee is charged to the account.

D) The cost to banks of maintaining checking accounts is expected to rise considerably because of added security expenses.

E) Consumers would not pay most of their bills through online services rather than using their existing checking accounts.
Show more
Veritas Prep OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Answer: C

Explanation: The conclusion is that high penalty fees would be eliminated when banks start charging annual fees for checking accounts. If, however, customers closed their checking accounts, the banks would lose that income, giving them no incentive to discontinue charging high penalty fees. Choice C, by stating that this would NOT happen, strengthens the conclusion. You can use the Assumption Negation Technique here. The negation of this choice is “Bank customers will close their checking accounts if a nominal annual fee is charged to the account.” Well if they DO close their checking accounts, this hurts the conclusion, since the banks would not be collecting enough annual fees from checking accounts to eliminate high penalty fees.

(A) We were already told that information about penalty fees is presented confusingly. It does not strengthen the argument to say that most people don’t read the fine print.

(B) This perception does not matter. What matters is whether the fees will be eliminated. This choice is out of the scope.

(D) This actually weakens the argument, since banks will be less inclined to drop the penalty fees if their costs rise considerably.

(E) This choice might seem to strengthen the argument by saying that people will not abandon their checking accounts in favor of online services, but you can use the Assumption Negation Technique to rule this choice out. Even if people DO pay most of their bills through online services rather than using their existing checking accounts, they would still be paying the annual fees on checking accounts, thus giving the banks a reason to eliminate penalty fees. The conclusion is not harmed by denying this choice, so the choice is not an assumption.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,831
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,831
Kudos: 986
Many banks charge high penalty fees on interest-bearing accounts for 25 Apr 2024, 19:25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts