Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:36 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:36
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
505-555 Level|   Weaken|         
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,072
 [5]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,072
 [5]
Many economically useful raw materials are nonrenewable and in limited 03 Mar 2020, 05:35
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

82% (01:15) correct 18% (01:23) wrong based on 435 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Many economically useful raw materials are nonrenewable and in limited supply on Earth. Therefore, unless those materials can be obtained somewhere other than Earth, people will eventually be unable to accomplish what they now accomplish using those materials.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?


(A) Some economically useful resources are renewable.

(B) It is extremely difficult to get raw materials from outer space.

(C) Functionally equivalent renewable substitutes could be found for nonrenewable resources that are in limited supply.

(D) What is accomplished now using nonrenewable resources is sometimes not worth accomplishing.

(E) It will be a few hundred years before the Earth is depleted of certain nonrenewable resources that are in limited supply.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
C
avatar
chetaksatav
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2019
Last visit: 08 Jul 2021
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
2
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GPA: 3.43
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
 [2]
Many economically useful raw materials are nonrenewable and in limited 04 Mar 2020, 11:40
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Many economically useful raw materials are nonrenewable and in limited supply on Earth. Therefore, unless those materials can be obtained somewhere other than Earth, people will eventually be unable to accomplish what they now accomplish using those materials.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?


(A) Some economically useful resources are renewable.

(B) It is extremely difficult to get raw materials from outer space.

(C) Functionally equivalent renewable substitutes could be found for nonrenewable resources that are in limited supply.

(D) What is accomplished now using nonrenewable resources is sometimes not worth accomplishing.

(E) It will be a few hundred years before the Earth is depleted of certain nonrenewable resources that are in limited supply.
Show more


Confused between C & D.
I think its C as whatever is achieved with nonrenewable resources that are available on earth can have subtistutes and same things can be achieved with these substitutes which will be renewable.
avatar
bansalsimona
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2019
Last visit: 15 Apr 2020
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
1
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 8
Kudos: 1
Many economically useful raw materials are nonrenewable and in limited 27 Mar 2020, 03:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hey, can anyone explain why E is wrong ?>
User avatar
RohitSaluja
User avatar
Joined: 02 Aug 2020
Last visit: 21 Sep 2024
Posts: 213
Own Kudos:
92
Given Kudos: 254
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Healthcare
Schools: HEC'22 (J)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.8
WE:Consulting (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: HEC'22 (J)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 213
Kudos: 92
Many economically useful raw materials are nonrenewable and in limited 16 May 2021, 01:03
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bansalsimona
hey, can anyone explain why E is wrong ?>
Show more

Hi bansalsimona, I might be late to respond but E says
Quote:
(E) It will be a few hundred years before the Earth is depleted of certain nonrenewable resources that are in limited supply.
Show more
If anything E could be a partial strengthener to the argument. The argument says that nonrenewable resources would get exhausted and E just confirms that they will if not in near future but in a hundred year. So E does nothing to weakens the claims.

I hope this helps. Let me know in case of any further queries, it is always fun to learn together.
User avatar
A_Nishith
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 455
Own Kudos:
199
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 455
Kudos: 199
 [1]
Many economically useful raw materials are nonrenewable and in limited 11 Jun 2025, 19:27
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument can be summarized as follows:

Premise: Many economically useful raw materials are nonrenewable and in limited supply on Earth.

Conclusion: Therefore, unless those materials can be obtained from somewhere else, people will eventually be unable to do what they now do using those materials.

This is a classic "no substitute, so depletion = doom" type of reasoning.

To weaken this argument, we should show that even if the materials aren't obtained from elsewhere, we still could continue accomplishing the same things — i.e., the depletion won’t necessarily stop us.

Let's go through the options:
(A) Some economically useful resources are renewable.

This doesn’t help. The argument is about nonrenewable resources. That some other resources are renewable doesn’t affect the logic that we’ll be unable to do certain things if nonrenewables run out.

❌ Incorrect

(B) It is extremely difficult to get raw materials from outer space.

This actually strengthens the argument. It implies we likely can’t get materials elsewhere, so depletion on Earth would cause problems.

❌ Incorrect

(C) Functionally equivalent renewable substitutes could be found for nonrenewable resources that are in limited supply.

Bingo. This undermines the logic that "once these run out, we can't do those things anymore." If we can substitute them with renewables that do the same job, then running out of the original materials won’t stop us from accomplishing the same things.

✅ Correct

(D) What is accomplished now using nonrenewable resources is sometimes not worth accomplishing.

This weakens the importance of the outcome, but not the logic of the conclusion. Even if it's not worth doing, we still wouldn't be able to do it — which is what the argument claims.

❌ Incorrect

(E) It will be a few hundred years before the Earth is depleted of certain nonrenewable resources that are in limited supply.

This just delays the conclusion, but doesn’t challenge the logic. The author says "eventually," so this doesn't weaken the argument.

❌ Incorrect

✅ Correct answer: (C)
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts