Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 5
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Many local town governments in New England still practice direct democracy where the population of the town votes to resolve issues. Critics of these town councils argue that well-funded special interest groups are able to influence these large open referenda.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthen the critics’ argument?
(A) Groups that oppose well-funded special interest groups do not have the budgets to mount major media campaigns in local markets.
(B) Direct elections are not effective because individual citizens do not have as much knowledge as professional legislators.
(C) Since individual voters make the decision, direct democracy provides insurance against the influence of wealthy special interest groups.
(D) Local newspapers and TV stations tend to be biased in favor of special interest groups and provide unbalanced reporting to local citizens.
(E) Decisions by local town governments usually are in line with the views of well-funded special interest.
Please explain, Thankss
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I think it should be E.
If the decisions of the government are in line with the views of the interest groups then it directly strengthens the claim that 'special interest groups are able to influence these large open referenda'.
Many local town governments in New England still practice direct democracy where the population of the town votes to resolve issues. Critics of these town councils argue that well-funded special interest groups are able to influence these large open referenda.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthen the critics’ argument?
(A) Groups that oppose well-funded special interest groups do not have the budgets to mount major media campaigns in local markets. (B) Direct elections are not effective because individual citizens do not have as much knowledge as professional legislators. (C) Since individual voters make the decision, direct democracy provides insurance against the influence of wealthy special interest groups. (D) Local newspapers and TV stations tend to be biased in favor of special interest groups and provide unbalanced reporting to local citizens. (E) Decisions by local town governments usually are in line with the views of well-funded special interest.
Show more
very confusing... lets narro down to A and E and choose E.
if the decisions by local town governments usually are in line with the views of well-funded special interest, it can be concluded that well-funded special interest groups are able to influence these large open referenda by electing the people thay support/want.
I go with E. It says special interest groups can influence decision of local town government. perfectly in line with the argument presented by the author.
Many local town governments in New England still practice direct democracy where the population of the town votes to resolve issues. Critics of these town councils argue that well-funded special interest groups are able to influence these large open referenda.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthen the critics’ argument?
(A) Groups that oppose well-funded special interest groups do not have the budgets to mount major media campaigns in local markets. (B) Direct elections are not effective because individual citizens do not have as much knowledge as professional legislators. (C) Since individual voters make the decision, direct democracy provides insurance against the influence of wealthy special interest groups. (D) Local newspapers and TV stations tend to be biased in favor of special interest groups and provide unbalanced reporting to local citizens. (E) Decisions by local town governments usually are in line with the views of well-funded special interest.
very confusing... lets narro down to A and E and choose E.
if the decisions by local town governments usually are in line with the views of well-funded special interest, it can be concluded that well-funded special interest groups are able to influence these large open referenda by electing the people thay support/want.
Show more
Narrowed it down to A and E. But will choose A.
I have one problem with E. The author argues that where the population of the town votes to resolve issues not the local goverment. The critics argue that since some special interest groups are well funded they are able to influence the population. Since the public votes to resolve issue not the goverment, how would getting people elected would change the outocme of the open referenda ???
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.