Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 May 2017, 06:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Many people change their wills on their own every few years,

Author Message
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 863
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 0

Many people change their wills on their own every few years, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2007, 04:59
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Many people change their wills on their own every few years, in response to significant changes in their personal or financial circumstances. This practice can create a problem for the executor when these people are careless and do not date their wills: the executor will then often know neither which one of several undated wills is the most recent, nor whether the will drawn up last has ever been found. Therefore, people should not only date their wills but also state in any new will which will it supersedes, for then there would not be a problem to begin with.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
(A) treats a partial solution to the stated problem as though it were a complete solution
(B) fails to distinguish between prevention of a problem and successful containment of the adverse effects that the problem might cause
(C) proposes a solution to the stated problem that does not actually solve the problem but merely makes someone else responsible for solving the problem
(D) claims that a certain action would be a change for the better without explicitly considering what negative consequences the action might have
(E) proposes that a certain action be based on information that would be unavailable at the time proposed for that action

Give reasons for ur choices...
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1457
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2007, 05:12
To me, D is the one that makes sense...
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 276
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2007, 07:25
should be A

the executor will then often know neither which one of several undated wills is the most recent, nor whether the will drawn up last has ever been found

The proposed solution solves only the first case
_________________

AimHigher

Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 115
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2007, 08:08
A.
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 436
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2007, 08:54
I think it is A.
If people date their wills and state in any new will which will it supersede, there still be a problem "whether the will drawn up last has ever been found".
So it is only partial solution.
What is OA?
Manager
Joined: 20 Nov 2006
Posts: 210
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2007, 10:24
Another A...

Waiting for OA...
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 863
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2007, 20:46
The OA is A.
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 197
Location: California
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2007, 21:55
vineetgupta wrote:
Many people change their wills on their own every few years, in response to significant changes in their personal or financial circumstances. This practice can create a problem for the executor when these people are careless and do not date their wills: the executor will then often know neither which one of several undated wills is the most recent, nor whether the will drawn up last has ever been found. Therefore, people should not only date their wills but also state in any new will which will it supersedes, for then there would not be a problem to begin with.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
(A) treats a partial solution to the stated problem as though it were a complete solution
(B) fails to distinguish between prevention of a problem and successful containment of the adverse effects that the problem might cause
(C) proposes a solution to the stated problem that does not actually solve the problem but merely makes someone else responsible for solving the problem
(D) claims that a certain action would be a change for the better without explicitly considering what negative consequences the action might have
(E) proposes that a certain action be based on information that would be unavailable at the time proposed for that action

Give reasons for ur choices...

A. Writing a date and putting a will number that a will will supercede DOESN'T guarantee that the will will be found later.
Re: CR-wills   [#permalink] 04 Apr 2007, 21:55
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Reviewer: Many historians claim, in their own treatment of 5 14 Mar 2011, 17:43
Paula: In recent years, DNA evidence has cleared many people 10 23 Feb 2011, 18:11
2 Because it was long thought that few people would watch 6 23 Jul 2009, 02:11
There are many reasons why individuals want to run their own 9 27 Feb 2009, 07:06
2 Many television viewers own videocassattes recorders 12 25 Jan 2008, 12:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by