Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 00:45 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 00:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
778,156
 [4]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,156
 [4]
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GDT
Joined: 02 Jan 2020
Last visit: 18 Sep 2020
Posts: 246
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 477
Posts: 246
Kudos: 117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
rahat16
Joined: 13 Dec 2018
Last visit: 03 Apr 2021
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
29
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 24
Kudos: 29
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,720
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,720
Kudos: 2,258
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Martha’s friend, who is very knowledgeable about edible flowers, told Martha that there are no edible daisies, at least not any that are palatable. Martha, however, reasons that since there are daisies that are a kind of chrysanthemum and since there are edible chrysanthemums that are quite palatable, what her friend told her must be incorrect.

Which one of the following has a flawed pattern of reasoning most like that in Martha’s reasoning?

(A) Jeanne is a member of the city chorus, and the city chorus is renowned. So Jeanne is an excellent singer. - WRONG. Simple plain wrong logic. Also, not similar to passage's.

(B) Rolfe belongs to the library reading group, and all members of that group are avid readers. So Rolfe is an avid reader. - WRONG. Like A only.

(C) Some of Noriko’s sisters are on the debate team, and some members of the debate team are poor students. So at least one of Noriko’s sisters must be a poor student. - CORRECT. One set is debate team and another is poor student. Both are clubbed and concluded which may not be necessarily true.

(D) Most of Leo’s friends are good swimmers, and quite strong. So it is likely that at least some of Leon’s friends are quite strong. - WRONG. This looks okay in logic that it applies.

(E) Many of Teresa’s colleagues have written books. Most of the books they have written are on good writing. So some of Teresa’s colleagues are good writers. - WORNG. Seems a good reasoning. 

In the passage the reasoning is wrong since it makes a conclusion on a set that has set overlapping it partially/fully, however, it is based on logic of different set. 

Answer C.
User avatar
Nothri
Joined: 18 Feb 2024
Last visit: 20 Jul 2024
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 84
Location: India
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can you please explain the answer for this one?
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts