Last visit was: 21 May 2026, 15:03 It is currently 21 May 2026, 15:03
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
Hovkial
User avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2019
Last visit: 24 Nov 2022
Posts: 802
Own Kudos:
2,619
Given Kudos: 202
Status:PhD trained. Education research, management.
Posts: 802
Kudos: 2,619
Mayor: There has been a long debate in city council about how to 06 Aug 2020, 11:03
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

80% (01:34) correct 20% (01:51) wrong based on 326 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Mayor: There has been a long debate in city council about how to accommodate projected increases in automobile traffic. Today, our choice is clear: either we adopt my plan to build a new expressway, or we do nothing. Doing nothing is not a viable option because our existing system of roads would be in gridlock within ten years given even a conservative estimate of future traffic levels. City council should therefore adopt my plan.

The reasoning in the mayor's argument is most vulnerable to which one of the following criticisms?

(A) It bases a projection only on conservative estimates rather than considering a wider range of estimates.

(B) It takes for granted that the options it considers are mutually exclusive.

(C) It fails to consider the possibility that the rate of increase in traffic will start to diminish after ten years.

(D) It fails to address the issue of the cost of traffic gridlock to the city's economy.

(E) It presents a choice that is limited to two options, without giving reasons for not considering any other options.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
E
User avatar
hemantbafna
User avatar
Joined: 30 Jan 2020
Last visit: 02 Mar 2021
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
90
Given Kudos: 527
Location: India
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Posts: 160
Kudos: 90
Mayor: There has been a long debate in city council about how to 07 Aug 2020, 07:06
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would go with the option of E. because the Mayor is giving only two option,and reason for not considering other options.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
raunakd11
User avatar
Joined: 30 Jan 2020
Last visit: 25 Nov 2020
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
158
 [1]
Given Kudos: 143
Location: India
Schools: ISB YLP 2020 NUS '23
GPA: 4
Schools: ISB YLP 2020 NUS '23
Posts: 139
Kudos: 158
 [1]
Mayor: There has been a long debate in city council about how to 07 Aug 2020, 09:35
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hovkial
Mayor: There has been a long debate in city council about how to accommodate projected increases in automobile traffic. Today, our choice is clear: either we adopt my plan to build a new expressway, or we do nothing. Doing nothing is not a viable option because our existing system of roads would be in gridlock within ten years given even a conservative estimate of future traffic levels. City council should therefore adopt my plan.

The reasoning in the mayor's argument is most vulnerable to which one of the following criticisms?

(A) It bases a projection only on conservative estimates rather than considering a wider range of estimates.

(B) It takes for granted that the options it considers are mutually exclusive.

(C) It fails to consider the possibility that the rate of increase in traffic will start to diminish after ten years.

(D) It fails to address the issue of the cost of traffic gridlock to the city's economy.

(E) It presents a choice that is limited to two options, without giving reasons for not considering any other options.
Show more

Hello guys!

In the draft, the mayor fails to express his plan of action and presents an undermined solution without strong facts and sufficient evidence.

So, we need to find the answer which is vulnerable to mayor's statement in terms of the limitation expressed by him.

Using POE,
Eliminate Option A, this can be a prospect. But does not clearly express the concern. So drop this.
Eliminate Option B, seems irrelevant.
Eliminate Option C, this is out of scope as there is no clarity regarding a surge in the traffic ten years down the line.
Eliminate Option D, the cost of traffic does not act as a major concern.

Option E seems fine and apt to our requirement because it clearly explains that the mayor fails to give a considerable solution, and limits his options, for his decision to be on board.

IMO,
Answer:- Option E

Thank you!

Regards,
Raunak Damle :angel:
avatar
gmatbalar
avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2021
Last visit: 27 Feb 2026
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
11
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
Concentration: Statistics, Finance
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
Posts: 58
Kudos: 11
Mayor: There has been a long debate in city council about how to 10 Feb 2022, 12:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I can see how option E is correct but any explanation why option B is incorrect?
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,489
Own Kudos:
7,691
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,489
Kudos: 7,691
Mayor: There has been a long debate in city council about how to 10 Feb 2022, 12:47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatbalar
I can see how option E is correct but any explanation why option B is incorrect?
Show more
Hello, gmatbalar. Answer choice (B) is incorrect because the two options—to build a new expressway or do nothing—are, in fact, mutually exclusive. (It is impossible to both do something and do nothing.) Thus, the argument is not vulnerable to such a criticism, and (B) cannot be correct.

The only other incorrect answer choice that seems to have snared a few people is (A), but the problem there is that the argument is based on even a conservative estimate of future traffic levels. We cannot assume that a wider range of estimates would likely project any less of a decrease in automobile traffic. (If anything, we might expect the wider range to encompass some estimates that were not as conservative—i.e. that future traffic levels might be worse than the argument posits.)

Perhaps the question makes more sense now, or at least (B) does. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
avatar
gmatbalar
avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2021
Last visit: 27 Feb 2026
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
11
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
Concentration: Statistics, Finance
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
Posts: 58
Kudos: 11
Mayor: There has been a long debate in city council about how to 10 Feb 2022, 13:07
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN

Hello, gmatbalar. Answer choice (B) is incorrect because the two options—to build a new expressway or do nothing—are, in fact, mutually exclusive. (It is impossible to both do something and do nothing.) Thus, the argument is not vulnerable to such a criticism, and (B) cannot be correct.

The only other incorrect answer choice that seems to have snared a few people is (A), but the problem there is that the argument is based on even a conservative estimate of future traffic levels. We cannot assume that a wider range of estimates would likely project any less of a decrease in automobile traffic. (If anything, we might expect the wider range to encompass some estimates that were not as conservative—i.e. that future traffic levels might be worse than the argument posits.)

Perhaps the question makes more sense now, or at least (B) does. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
Show more

Thanks for the clarification, Andrew. I knew they are mutually exclusive but the "vulnerable to criticism" makes sense now.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Stanindaw
User avatar
Joined: 11 Dec 2020
Last visit: 15 May 2026
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
55
Given Kudos: 73
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Economics
Schools: Booth '26 Fuqua '27
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q80 V80 DI77
GPA: 3.7
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Booth '26 Fuqua '27
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q80 V80 DI77
Posts: 127
Kudos: 55
Mayor: There has been a long debate in city council about how to 11 Sep 2023, 09:25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
gmatbalar
I can see how option E is correct but any explanation why option B is incorrect?
Hello, gmatbalar. Answer choice (B) is incorrect because the two options—to build a new expressway or do nothing—are, in fact, mutually exclusive. (It is impossible to both do something and do nothing.) Thus, the argument is not vulnerable to such a criticism, and (B) cannot be correct.

The only other incorrect answer choice that seems to have snared a few people is (A), but the problem there is that the argument is based on even a conservative estimate of future traffic levels. We cannot assume that a wider range of estimates would likely project any less of a decrease in automobile traffic. (If anything, we might expect the wider range to encompass some estimates that were not as conservative—i.e. that future traffic levels might be worse than the argument posits.)

Perhaps the question makes more sense now, or at least (B) does. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
Show more



Hi Andrew,
I preferred B, because i thought that it the plan proposed by Mayor could be so irrelevant that it is as impactful as doing nothing.
So they are mutually exclusive as they give us the same result.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7394 posts
AbhishekP220108
593 posts
bhanu29
368 posts