Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
I am trying to prepare for GMAT and stuck badly with Critical Reasoning. I am doing practice on Assumption questions in Critical Reasoning. I am facing three major issues with CR questions :
i) Can someone in detail explain me Theory of Negation? With examples and tips, though I have read it in Kaplan & OG, but still require real time tips
ii) I am able to narrow down two main answer choices for Assumption corrections but end up in picking the wrong one? Are there any tips to answer the right question?
iii) I did questions from Kaplan and OG and I did OK in my first attemp, but when I tried doing CR- Assumption questions from
Most of them turned to be incorrect? Quite frustrating
Can anybody help me out in preparing me for CR.
My plan is to give GMAT by mid of September.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The theory of negation (or, as we call it, the negation test), hinges on the role of assumptions. Assumptions are the information that is necessary for an argument to hold. That means, if you negate the correct assumption, the argument must not hold!
So, here is a simple "Chemical X should be restricted because all poisons should be restricted" is a simple example. Suppose we are wondering if an answer choice, "Chemical X is a poison," is the correct assumption. Well, what if it's false? What if Chemical X is not a poison? Well, the argument falls apart! That means we have the right answer.
The thing about the Negation test is, it's not very efficient. If you find that you're consistently down to two answer choices, it can be a great tie breaker. But if you're practicing with Kaplan strategies, you shouldn't need it! Focus on predicting what the answer should be, and looking for the best match!
I am trying to prepare for GMAT and stuck badly with Critical Reasoning. I am doing practice on Assumption questions in Critical Reasoning. I am facing three major issues with CR questions :
i) Can someone in detail explain me Theory of Negation? With examples and tips, though I have read it in Kaplan & OG, but still require real time tips
ii) I am able to narrow down two main answer choices for Assumption corrections but end up in picking the wrong one? Are there any tips to answer the right question?
iii) I did questions from Kaplan and OG and I did OK in my first attemp, but when I tried doing CR- Assumption questions from
well negation technique simply says that when having doubt over two choices, negate them and check which will weaken argument . the one which weakens most is correct answer. do take care to logically negate answer opposite of good is not good and it is not bad. . opposite of some is not some (or many ) it is none and opposite of all is not all
I use the following logic. Assumptions are additional premises. If premises go awry, your conclusion will be flawed. Hence, we test this by assuming that our additional premise (the assumption), is wrong & whether that has any effect on our conclusion.
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.