Hi,
For what it's worth I'm wondering a bit about a similar thing. I've taken 4
MGMAT tests now and my quant has flatlined/decreased while my verbal has steadily improved. That's despite 90% of my study time in between being on quant. I wonder if one or both of two things are true:
1. Getting used to the odd/awkward phrasing of some of the
MGMAT verbal questions (which are undoubtedly less clear than the official ones) means that your score will tend to improve through practice even when you're not changing the way you understand the fundamental concepts.
2. When you're hammering at your quant perhaps the conceptual gains you're making get offset by a lack of concentration or an inability to look at the problems strategically. I think I may be approaching the quant questions less intelligently than before, even though I think I have a better understanding of the concepts. Or at least that's the only thing I can think of to explain the performance.
I also think the
MGMAT quant problems are very tough, and I find them significantly harder to read and understand what to do than even the harder questions in OG12. Even just the font is horrible to read.
Other than that, my only observation would be that you sound a bit stressed and that this is likely to hurt your score if you feel that way during testing. I think I saw two different dates in there for your test day, but if you have enough time left to take a time out now, do something relaxing, clear your mind and then come back and to another CAT, you may find that gives a truer reflection of where you currently are. Even if you don't have time to do that I would suggest that when it comes to the day itself you do what you can to feel alert, confident and also as relaxed as possible. You obviously care about your result so I wouldn't worry about not being sufficiently primed on the day itself, your concern may well be on the other side - being sufficiently calm and focused to manage your time well and choose the best strategy to approach each problem.
That's all just conjecture based on a couple of lines you've written above, but hope it may be of some help.
Good luck, and if anyone else has any thoughts I'd be interested to hear them.
Cheers,
Matt