GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 09 Dec 2019, 23:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Microsoft Teams, a chat-based workspace that improves the productivity

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 13 May 2017
Posts: 121
Location: Finland
Concentration: Accounting, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 530 Q42 V22
GMAT 2: 570 Q36 V31
GMAT 3: 600 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.14
WE: Account Management (Entertainment and Sports)
Reviews Badge
Microsoft Teams, a chat-based workspace that improves the productivity  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2018, 05:18
9
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

28% (02:28) correct 72% (02:35) wrong based on 81 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Microsoft Teams, a chat-based workspace that improves the productivity of employees and is licensed per employee, aims to displace Slack, the market leader in this field. Microsoft believes that Teams is so much better than Slack that it is offering it to organizations with an average employee expense higher than $25 per hour for no charge other than compensation for the time saved by the organization by using Teams over using Slack the prior year. Microsoft claims that in 1 year it would be able to more than make up for the cost of service.

Which of the following, if it takes place, is likely to make it difficult for Microsoft to recuperate the cost of Teams?

A. Economy going in recession forcing employers to let go of several high cost employees.

B. Slack starting to research on improving its product to the extent that it almost becomes just as good as Teams.

C. Employers outsourcing a bunch of work currently done by the lowest cost employees, reducing the overall employee count.

D. The additional revenue that Microsoft receives from increased adoption of other Microsoft Products integrated with Teams.

E. The reduction in revenue caused by lowered reliance on a few other Microsoft’s products that Teams makes redundant.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Posts: 103
Microsoft Teams, a chat-based workspace that improves the productivity  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2018, 12:09
Was confused between A and C but chose A as letting go of high cost employees will reduce the compensation more than letting go of lowest cost employees causing greater impact to Microsoft's business with Teams.

B and D are irrelevant and E too is upon closer look as Microsoft would have already accounted for E once they propose this plan.
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 623
Re: Microsoft Teams, a chat-based workspace that improves the productivity  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2018, 17:52
Could you explain the argument?
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 644
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GPA: 3.92
WE: Operations (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Microsoft Teams, a chat-based workspace that improves the productivity  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Nov 2018, 07:57
4
Quote:
Microsoft Teams, a chat-based workspace that improves the productivity of employees and is licensed per employee, aims to displace Slack, the market leader in this field. Microsoft believes that Teams is so much better than Slack that it is offering it to organizations with an average employee expense higher than $25 per hour for no charge other than compensation for the time saved by the organization by using Teams over using Slack the prior year. Microsoft claims that in 1 year it would be able to more than make up for the cost of service.


Understand :
- MT wants to displace S
- MT plan - offer service to orgs with avg emp expense HIGHER than 25 for free.
- MT will earn - time saved by employees by working on MT relative to that of S (TIME TAKEN BY S LAST YEAR) ( for eg : if S took 10 mins and MT took 5 mins , MT will charge only for the 5 mins ,that is the time saved)
-MT conclusion : MORE THAN MAKE UP for the cost of service. That is MT will not only regain the costs BUT also gain some more revenue from this service.

Quote:
Which of the following, if it takes place, is likely to make it difficult for Microsoft to recuperate the cost of Teams?

- Which of the following , IF IT TAKES PLACE (They arent yet real. ) , will weaken MT's claim. (that is costs won't be regained)

Think : MT thinks that T is better than S and T will save time and hence thinks that offering the service for free and charging only for the time saved , will be more than enough to regain costs . He hasnt presented any reasonable facts or data to make his claim. He just says MT is better than S.
The relevant facets we have to focus on are : 1) save time 2) number of average employees paid more than 25 MT will be offered to.

1)what if something happens and MT's time drastically increases with respect to that of S.? then the time SAVED may not be much.
assumption : nothing may harm MT's time


2)what if the number of emp( paid more than 25) reduce , outweighing the gains made by savings?? see MT is basing his claim on CURRENT statistics . for eg : 100 emp (paid more than 25) are given services. Cost per service 10$ . total cost = 100*10 = 1000 (now this 1000$ is invested). So if the number of employees paid more than 25 decrease substantially then how will MT get it's cost back?? even if we consider savings , if the no. of emp lost is substantial then cost wont be repurcated.
Assumption : Number of emp (paid more than 25$) dont reduce substantially to outweigh savings gain.


(all i did was think along the given data. Nothing Out of scope)

Quote:
A. Economy going in recession forcing employers to let go of several high cost employees.

- read Scenario 2 : if orgs fire high cost emps (more than 25$) and that too SEVERAL. Then the costs won't be regained even if there are savings.
see MT is basing his claim on CURRENT statistics . for eg : 100 emp (paid more than 25) are given services. Cost per service 10$ . total cost = 100*10 = 1000 (now this 1000$ is invested). So if the number of employees paid more than 25 decrease then how will MT get it's cost back?? even if we consider savings , if the no. of emp lost is substantial then cost wont be repurcated.

Quote:
B. Slack starting to research on improving its product to the extent that it almost becomes just as good as Teams.

- STARTING TO RESEARCH .. MT is going to save time relative to time spent by S LAST YEAR. So even if S did something NOW. T may still gain as we are saving with respect to LAST YEAR'S time.

Quote:
C. Employers outsourcing a bunch of work currently done by the lowest cost employees, reducing the overall employee count.

- MT is offering the service to 25$ per hour worker and not to LOWEST cost employees. so even if LOWEST cost emps get lost , the number of emps paid higher than 25$ may still be the same. NO IMPACT.

Quote:
D. The additional revenue that Microsoft receives from increased adoption of other Microsoft Products integrated with Teams.

- MT is concerned about this service only.

Quote:
E. The reduction in revenue caused by lowered reliance on a few other Microsoft’s products that Teams makes redundant.

-We are concerned about only this service. TOTAL REVENUE of M is not our concern.

Note :1) the main part of this question was "if it takes place " ..why is it relevant? because MT is basing its clain on CURRENT STATS.
2) A little bit general info : 25$ / hour is pretty handsome pay. Even if you did not know this , the ans choices are clear enough by stating "lowest " and "high"
3) choice B : trap - IF you did not read carefully, then you wouldve thot that if S cathces up with MT on time , then no savings. BUT the saving are on LAST YEAR. and not future.
4) Always always think before you solve. You dont have to think too much. Just take the author's given data and try to find such a thing which would weaken his claim. For eg : what if (read above).
5) the entire reasoning falls apart if you try to PROVE ans choices. We are asked to weaken , not disprove.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7238
Re: Microsoft Teams, a chat-based workspace that improves the productivity  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2019, 20:31
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Microsoft Teams, a chat-based workspace that improves the productivity   [#permalink] 27 Nov 2019, 20:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Microsoft Teams, a chat-based workspace that improves the productivity

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne