Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
11 Feb 2024, 21:32
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
66% (01:36) correct
34%
(01:47)
wrong
based on 1407
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Morowa: As a general rule, those responsible for harming the environment should be responsible for fixing it. Thus, businesses should pay for and clean up environmental problems they cause.
Thema: Are the businesses the only ones responsible? Oftentimes, consumers drive businesses to produce products in environmentally damaging ways by primarily purchasing inexpensive items that disproportionally result in greater environmental harm.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for Morowa's argument in light of Thema's reply?
A) Consumers of such products know that they are responsible for harming the environment.
B) At least some consumers purchase products that they know are environmentally friendly.
C) Most consumers purchase at least some products that do not substantially harm the environment.
D) Being inexpensive does not necessarily result in environmental harm.
E) Having businesses pay for and clean up their environmental problems can pass along some of the cost to consumers.
Thema: Are the businesses the only ones responsible? Oftentimes, consumers drive businesses to produce products in environmentally damaging ways by primarily purchasing inexpensive items that disproportionally result in greater environmental harm.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for Morowa's argument in light of Thema's reply?
A) Consumers of such products know that they are responsible for harming the environment.
B) At least some consumers purchase products that they know are environmentally friendly.
C) Most consumers purchase at least some products that do not substantially harm the environment.
D) Being inexpensive does not necessarily result in environmental harm.
E) Having businesses pay for and clean up their environmental problems can pass along some of the cost to consumers.
Question exposed a gap?
Take sectional Adaptive Quant, Verbal, or DI tests on GMAT Club and review the detailed score report.
Get started →
12 Feb 2024, 10:37
Kudos
Bookmarks
Explanation
Morowa: As a general rule, those responsible for harming the environment should be responsible for fixing it. Thus, businesses should pay for and clean up environmental problems they cause.
Thema: Are the businesses the only ones responsible? Oftentimes, consumers drive businesses to produce products in environmentally damaging ways by primarily purchasing inexpensive items that disproportionally result in greater environmental harm.
We see that Morowa concludes the following:
businesses should pay for and clean up environmental problems they cause
Morowa supports her conclusion with one premise, which is a "rule" or principle:
As a general rule, those responsible for harming the environment should be responsible for fixing it.
Then, Thema brings up the issue that consumers can share responsibility for environmental problems caused by the activities of businesses.
We see that the implications of what Thema brings up are that Morowa's conclusion may not be correct in that it may not make sense to have businesses handle environmental problems if "those responsible for harming the environment should be responsible for fixing it" since consumers are often responsible too.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for Morowa's argument in light of Thema's reply?
The correct anwer will show that Morowa's conclusion makes sense in the context of what Thema has brought up.
A) Consumers of such products know that they are responsible for harming the environment.
The fact that consumers of harmful products know they are harming the environment makes consumers even more clearly responsible for the environmental harm they cause.
A fact that makes consumers more clearly responsible doesn't support the conclusion that businesses should pay for and clean up environmental problems.
Eliminate.
B) At least some consumers purchase products that they know are environmentally friendly.
This fact about consumers purchasing products that "are environmentally friendly" does not indicate that businesses should be the ones to pay for and clean up environmental problems.
If anything, this choice shows that consumers could avoid causing environmental problems and thus helps to confirm that consumers who purchase harmful products are at least partially responsible for the harm caused.
Eliminate.
C) Most consumers purchase at least some products that do not substantially harm the environment.
The fact that consumers purchase at least some products that do not substantially harm the environment doesn't mean that consumers are not responsible for the harm done by products they purchase that do harm the environment.
So, this choice may have the vibe of taking the responsibility for environmental harm off consumers and placing it all on businesses, but it doesn't really.
Eliminate.
D) Being inexpensive does not necessarily result in environmental harm.
The fact that not all inexpensive products cause environmental harm doesn't change the fact that consumers often do cause environmental harm by purchasing inexpensive products.
So, this choice may have the vibe of taking the responsibility for environmental harm off consumers and placing it all on businesses, but it doesn't really.
Eliminate.
E) Having businesses pay for and clean up their environmental problems can pass along some of the cost to consumers.
Let's review the principle that Morowa uses to support her conclusion:
As a general rule, those responsible for harming the environment should be responsible for fixing it.
Her reasoning is that businesses should pay for and clean up environmental problems because they cause harm to the enviroment and those responsible for harm to the environment should be responsible for fixing it.
Now, given what this choice says, we see that, if businesses pay for and clean up environmental problems, consumers will also be responsible for fixing the environment because businesses will pass along some of the cost to consumers.
Thus, this choice addresses the issue that Thema brought up by showing that, even if consumers share responsibility for the environmental harm, Morowa's conclusion is valid because her rule, "those responsible for harming the environment should be responsible for fixing it," will be followed since consumers will indirectly pay for and clean up the problems since businesses pass along the cost.
Correct answer: E
Morowa: As a general rule, those responsible for harming the environment should be responsible for fixing it. Thus, businesses should pay for and clean up environmental problems they cause.
Thema: Are the businesses the only ones responsible? Oftentimes, consumers drive businesses to produce products in environmentally damaging ways by primarily purchasing inexpensive items that disproportionally result in greater environmental harm.
We see that Morowa concludes the following:
businesses should pay for and clean up environmental problems they cause
Morowa supports her conclusion with one premise, which is a "rule" or principle:
As a general rule, those responsible for harming the environment should be responsible for fixing it.
Then, Thema brings up the issue that consumers can share responsibility for environmental problems caused by the activities of businesses.
We see that the implications of what Thema brings up are that Morowa's conclusion may not be correct in that it may not make sense to have businesses handle environmental problems if "those responsible for harming the environment should be responsible for fixing it" since consumers are often responsible too.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for Morowa's argument in light of Thema's reply?
The correct anwer will show that Morowa's conclusion makes sense in the context of what Thema has brought up.
A) Consumers of such products know that they are responsible for harming the environment.
The fact that consumers of harmful products know they are harming the environment makes consumers even more clearly responsible for the environmental harm they cause.
A fact that makes consumers more clearly responsible doesn't support the conclusion that businesses should pay for and clean up environmental problems.
Eliminate.
B) At least some consumers purchase products that they know are environmentally friendly.
This fact about consumers purchasing products that "are environmentally friendly" does not indicate that businesses should be the ones to pay for and clean up environmental problems.
If anything, this choice shows that consumers could avoid causing environmental problems and thus helps to confirm that consumers who purchase harmful products are at least partially responsible for the harm caused.
Eliminate.
C) Most consumers purchase at least some products that do not substantially harm the environment.
The fact that consumers purchase at least some products that do not substantially harm the environment doesn't mean that consumers are not responsible for the harm done by products they purchase that do harm the environment.
So, this choice may have the vibe of taking the responsibility for environmental harm off consumers and placing it all on businesses, but it doesn't really.
Eliminate.
D) Being inexpensive does not necessarily result in environmental harm.
The fact that not all inexpensive products cause environmental harm doesn't change the fact that consumers often do cause environmental harm by purchasing inexpensive products.
So, this choice may have the vibe of taking the responsibility for environmental harm off consumers and placing it all on businesses, but it doesn't really.
Eliminate.
E) Having businesses pay for and clean up their environmental problems can pass along some of the cost to consumers.
Let's review the principle that Morowa uses to support her conclusion:
As a general rule, those responsible for harming the environment should be responsible for fixing it.
Her reasoning is that businesses should pay for and clean up environmental problems because they cause harm to the enviroment and those responsible for harm to the environment should be responsible for fixing it.
Now, given what this choice says, we see that, if businesses pay for and clean up environmental problems, consumers will also be responsible for fixing the environment because businesses will pass along some of the cost to consumers.
Thus, this choice addresses the issue that Thema brought up by showing that, even if consumers share responsibility for the environmental harm, Morowa's conclusion is valid because her rule, "those responsible for harming the environment should be responsible for fixing it," will be followed since consumers will indirectly pay for and clean up the problems since businesses pass along the cost.
Correct answer: E
General Discussion
22 Oct 2024, 10:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
Kind of didn't like this argument, mainly because choice E by passing along the environmental costs to consumers, the products would not be inexpensive any longer would change the whole dynamic of the argument. My inner question was then if the consumers would still buy the products. I understand now why E is correct, however, when trying to answer I thought this would not make sense as then Morowa would take a position against the consumers. Somehow I thought that Morowa was pro consumer. But rereading the argument, his statement is pretty neutral, he just wants the environmental costs to be taken care of, doesn't matter how. If the consumers will be asked to pay their fair share, there is no constraint that is implying that he would be against it. Missed a key part and assumed something that wasn't there to begin with.
