Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jul 1508:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Jul 0901:00 PM EDT
-02:00 PM EDT
More Target Test Prep students are earning 100th percentile GMAT scores. Don’t settle for less when the Target Test Prep course gives you everything you need to score high on the GMAT. Start your 5-day free trial today.- Jul 14
10:00 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
GMAT Preparation Online - A limited time sale use code: EXPERTSGLOBAL10 
Jul 1609:30 AM EDT
-11:30 AM EDT
Is INSEAD your dream b-school and you're looking for solid prep and application strategies to get there? Check out Barkavi’s end-to-end journey to know how she did! Get insights into the INSEAD admissions process, know what Adcoms look at, and more!
Jul 1611:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Jul 1911:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
08 May 2022, 03:13
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 1
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
53% (02:37) correct
47%
(02:39) wrong
based on 684
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 2
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
84% (00:40) correct 16%
(01:05) wrong
based on 649
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 3
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
79% (01:18) correct 21%
(01:29) wrong
based on 666
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Most business historians give the impression that Marseilles, a French Mediterranean city, was in dire economic straits from 1700 to 1715, when France was at war in the Mediterranean area. Their conclusions are based partly on a documented 30 percent decline in revenue generated by the cottimo, an import tax collected on the cargo of ships returning to Marseilles from various Middle Eastern ports. The decline in revenue from this particular tax could hypothetically have been caused by a massive drop in levels of commercial activity in Marseilles. However, during the war years Marseilles' role as a grain importer grew, and most foodstuffs had always been—and remained—exempt from the tax. Also, due to a shift in trading patterns caused by the war, the city's merchants did more business with those Middle Eastern cities on whose trade the cottimo had always been collected at a lower rate. Moreover, during this period, a change occurred in the thinking of Marseilles merchants, who, in response to the war's challenges, displayed a new sense of daring. They sent some ships outside the Mediterranean and began to engage in trade in the Atlantic and Pacific. This was significant, since the cottimo was collected only on goods entering the city from Mediterranean ports in the Middle East.
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. correct a misimpression about the conclusions actually drawn by most business historians
B. challenge the interpretation of a piece of evidence on which certain business historians have based their conclusions
C. suggest the effects of a particular historical event on a city's commerce
D. explain why scholars, on the basis of information available to them, ought to have reached certain conclusions about trade
E. argue that, contrary to widespread belief, certain changes in trading patterns actually are signs of economic expansion
2. According to the author, most business historians see the decrease in cottimo revenues in Marseilles as providing evidence of which of the following?
A. A decline in the city's economy
B. A change in entrepreneurial thinking
C. A shift in Mediterranean patterns of trade
D. An increase in trade outside the Mediterranean
E. A drop in the amount of goods imported for later reexport
3. If the information in the passage is accurate, which of the following must be concluded?
A. Most business historians are wrong in believing that France's war in the Mediterranean had adverse effects on commercial activity in the Mediterranean.
B. The decline in tax revenues in Marseilles during the period 1700–1715 was only temporary, since it was due to short-term shifts in trade patterns.
C. Merchants in Marseilles paid less in total taxes to the city during the period 1700–1715 than they did in earlier periods.
D. Decreases in cottimo revenue in Marseilles during the period 1700–1715 do not necessarily indicate concurrent decreases in the city's overall commercial activity.
E. Losses in Marseilles due to shifts in trading patterns in the Mediterranean during the period 1700–1715 were adequately balanced by the expansion of the city's trade in other areas of the world.
A. correct a misimpression about the conclusions actually drawn by most business historians
B. challenge the interpretation of a piece of evidence on which certain business historians have based their conclusions
C. suggest the effects of a particular historical event on a city's commerce
D. explain why scholars, on the basis of information available to them, ought to have reached certain conclusions about trade
E. argue that, contrary to widespread belief, certain changes in trading patterns actually are signs of economic expansion
2. According to the author, most business historians see the decrease in cottimo revenues in Marseilles as providing evidence of which of the following?
A. A decline in the city's economy
B. A change in entrepreneurial thinking
C. A shift in Mediterranean patterns of trade
D. An increase in trade outside the Mediterranean
E. A drop in the amount of goods imported for later reexport
3. If the information in the passage is accurate, which of the following must be concluded?
A. Most business historians are wrong in believing that France's war in the Mediterranean had adverse effects on commercial activity in the Mediterranean.
B. The decline in tax revenues in Marseilles during the period 1700–1715 was only temporary, since it was due to short-term shifts in trade patterns.
C. Merchants in Marseilles paid less in total taxes to the city during the period 1700–1715 than they did in earlier periods.
D. Decreases in cottimo revenue in Marseilles during the period 1700–1715 do not necessarily indicate concurrent decreases in the city's overall commercial activity.
E. Losses in Marseilles due to shifts in trading patterns in the Mediterranean during the period 1700–1715 were adequately balanced by the expansion of the city's trade in other areas of the world.
Source: Skills Insight
06 Dec 2022, 08:26
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 1
VerbalNote
GMATNinja Please elaborate option A and B for question 1
Let's start by breaking down the passage:- The author begins by presenting a conclusion held by most business historians: that Marseille was in "dire economic straits from 1700 to 1715."
- Next, we are told why the historians believe this: because there was a 30% decline in the cottimo.
- Finally, we are given three reasons why economic activity might not have fallen despite the fact that the cottimo fell (i.e. basically, because imports grew from items that were not subject to the cottimo tax).
Let's now consider the question and answer choice (A):
Quote:
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. correct a misimpression about the conclusions actually drawn by most business historians
The author does seem to want to correct something. But is it a "misimpression about the conclusions" drawn by historians? Not really.A. correct a misimpression about the conclusions actually drawn by most business historians
Keep in mind, the author is attacking the basis of certain historians' conclusions. In other words, the author isn't trying to correct a "misimpression" about the conclusion itself that Marseille was in "dire economic straits." Rather, the author objects to the idea that a fall in the cottimo supports this conclusion. As the author points out, even if the cottimo fell, imports could have gone up. Eliminate (A).
Consider (B):
Quote:
B. challenge the interpretation of a piece of evidence on which certain business historians have based their conclusions
Let's start by relating the above statement to the passage. The "conclusion" of historians is that "Marseille was in dire economic straits." The "piece of evidence" is the decline of the cottimo. The "interpretation" of this piece of evidence is that it supports the conclusion that Marseille was in "dire economic straits." How well does that match the passage?Pretty well. The author is mainly concerned with attacking the idea that the fall in the cottimo really indicates "dire economic straits." In fact, the author thinks that imports could have gone up, even if the cottimo fell. So it makes sense to say the author is challenging the "interpretation of a piece of evidence."
For that reason, (B) is correct.
I hope that helps!
General Discussion
13 Oct 2022, 00:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. correct a misimpression about the conclusions actually drawn by most business historians
- Its not a misimpression , the historians didn't wrongly interpret , they did what they needed to. Its just that the passage is suggesting that what the evidence indicates might not be that serious of a situation as the historians are exaggerating.
B. challenge the interpretation of a piece of evidence on which certain business historians have based their conclusions
- Yes, The passage challenges the historians interpretation of the evidence . (i.e it's not as bad as they think it to be)
C. suggest the effects of a particular historical event on a city's commerce
- The passage's primary concern is not to tell us about the effects of the war on citys commerce. It is to tell us that the situation what the historians interpret isn't as bad as they think it to be
D. explain why scholars, on the basis of information available to them, ought to have reached certain conclusions about trade
- The passage isn't telling us why the scholars have reached their conclusion.
E. argue that, contrary to widespread belief, certain changes in trading patterns actually are signs of economic expansion
- The passage isn't saying that these changes are signs of economic expansion , nor is it saying that this a widespread belief
3. If the information in the passage is accurate, which of the following must be concluded?
A. Most business historians are wrong in believing that France's war in the Mediterranean had adverse effects on commercial activity in the Mediterranean.
- No , they aren't wrong in believing that the war had adverse effects(it can have adverse effects). They are wrong in believing that the war had such adverse effects that Marseilles was in dire economic straits. [Again , its not as bad as they think it to be]
B. The decline in tax revenues in Marseilles during the period 1700–1715 was only temporary, since it was due to short-term shifts in trade patterns.
- We don't know if decline in tax revenues was temporary or permanent. Again what tax revenues are we talking about ? import tax, total tax?
C. Merchants in Marseilles paid less in total taxes to the city during the period 1700–1715 than they did in earlier periods.
- No mention about the TOTAL taxes, nor mention about the earlier period taxes
D. Decreases in cottimo revenue in Marseilles during the period 1700–1715 do not necessarily indicate concurrent decreases in the city's overall commercial activity.
- Exactly what the passage is talking about
E. Losses in Marseilles due to shifts in trading patterns in the Mediterranean during the period 1700–1715 were adequately balanced by the expansion of the city's trade in other areas of the world.
- Yes , trade did expand , but losses were BALANCED ?? , if it were balanced , then why would marseilles be in economically bad situtation
A. correct a misimpression about the conclusions actually drawn by most business historians
- Its not a misimpression , the historians didn't wrongly interpret , they did what they needed to. Its just that the passage is suggesting that what the evidence indicates might not be that serious of a situation as the historians are exaggerating.
B. challenge the interpretation of a piece of evidence on which certain business historians have based their conclusions
- Yes, The passage challenges the historians interpretation of the evidence . (i.e it's not as bad as they think it to be)
C. suggest the effects of a particular historical event on a city's commerce
- The passage's primary concern is not to tell us about the effects of the war on citys commerce. It is to tell us that the situation what the historians interpret isn't as bad as they think it to be
D. explain why scholars, on the basis of information available to them, ought to have reached certain conclusions about trade
- The passage isn't telling us why the scholars have reached their conclusion.
E. argue that, contrary to widespread belief, certain changes in trading patterns actually are signs of economic expansion
- The passage isn't saying that these changes are signs of economic expansion , nor is it saying that this a widespread belief
3. If the information in the passage is accurate, which of the following must be concluded?
A. Most business historians are wrong in believing that France's war in the Mediterranean had adverse effects on commercial activity in the Mediterranean.
- No , they aren't wrong in believing that the war had adverse effects(it can have adverse effects). They are wrong in believing that the war had such adverse effects that Marseilles was in dire economic straits. [Again , its not as bad as they think it to be]
B. The decline in tax revenues in Marseilles during the period 1700–1715 was only temporary, since it was due to short-term shifts in trade patterns.
- We don't know if decline in tax revenues was temporary or permanent. Again what tax revenues are we talking about ? import tax, total tax?
C. Merchants in Marseilles paid less in total taxes to the city during the period 1700–1715 than they did in earlier periods.
- No mention about the TOTAL taxes, nor mention about the earlier period taxes
D. Decreases in cottimo revenue in Marseilles during the period 1700–1715 do not necessarily indicate concurrent decreases in the city's overall commercial activity.
- Exactly what the passage is talking about
E. Losses in Marseilles due to shifts in trading patterns in the Mediterranean during the period 1700–1715 were adequately balanced by the expansion of the city's trade in other areas of the world.
- Yes , trade did expand , but losses were BALANCED ?? , if it were balanced , then why would marseilles be in economically bad situtation
