This is ultimately about NUMBERS—i.e., the amount of gas used by consumers driving hybrid cars vs. the amount of gas that the same consumers would use in traditional gas cars ("before these manufacturers began offering hybrid cars and trucks").
The conclusion of the argument is that these consumers use LESS gas in hybrid cars than they would have used in traditional gas cars. This conclusion is currently unsubstantiated, so literally anything that points the numbers in the correct direction will be a 'strengthener' here. Specifically, any sort of quantitative evidence that consumers use LESS gas AFTER SWITCHING TO HYBRIDS will be the correct answer here.
(Brainstorming possible answers upfront / 'pre-thinking': This could happen in many different ways.
Since total gasoline usage is miles/gallon · gallons, though, these possibilities will basically all fall into two categories:
• FEWER MILES DRIVEN: Maybe consumers just don't drive as many miles in the hybrid cars—perhaps long road trips are less appealing in them, or they can't go as far in the winter, or something else that would limit mileage on hybrid cars but not on traditional cars.
—or—
• MORE MILES PER GALLON: Maybe the hybrid cars get more miles per gallon on the gasoline that they actually use.)
.
Choice D is pretty much exactly the idea of the second bullet point above, so choice D is the correct answer.
FYI, the wording of this problem is much looser than that of GMAC's critical reasoning problems.
Most importantly, you just have to assume that the consumers in question actually drove traditional gas cars BEFORE hybrids—since the central comparison is nonsense if they didn't—but GMAC would definitely articulate this explicitly. The same issue also exists in choice D, in which "the equivalent number of miles that could have been driven with the gasoline used to create that electricity" represents the number of miles that could have been driven in a traditional gas car on the same amount of gasoline; once again, GMAC would absolutely SAY this, just to ensure the integrity of the logic and of the problem itself (by ruling out edge cases like "How do we know they didn't drive a fully electric car before the hybrid?"—which would totally destroy this problem).
.
Wrong answers:
A/ This choice suggests that hybrid cars use more energy in general, which runs in the opposite direction from the argument that we want to strengthen. Moreover, this choice has nothing to say about the usage of gasoline specifically, so it can't speak to the conclusion to begin with.
B/ The problem is about fuel use by consumers, not by manufacturers, so this choice is irrelevant.
C/ This choice pushes the expected gasoline usage of hybrid cars upward, so it runs in the opposite direction from the argument that we want to strengthen. Moreover, there's nothing here that allows a comparison with non-hybrid (traditional gas) cars, so this choice can't possibly be the basis for judging the conclusion.
E/ Hybrid cars use electricity as a primary fuel while non-hybrid cars do not, so this is already an obviously true fact in the given context. Since this choice just repeats something that can already be gleaned from the given information, it contributes nothing at all.