Author 
Message 
Director
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 520

My argument here is that Statement1 is insufficient here. [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jun 2007, 20:37
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please repost it in the respective forum. My argument here is that Statement1 is insufficient here. Though it says that the number of members on the board is 23, the population can be equal to 500,000 also.
Please explain.
Attachments
1224_537.JPG [ 46.28 KiB  Viewed 728 times ]



Intern
Joined: 02 Jun 2007
Posts: 27

If the town had 25 board members, then the population is at least 500,000. Since there arn't 25 board members, we can say the population is less than 500,000.
Thats how I see it.



Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 366

galt wrote: If the town had 25 board members, then the population is at least 500,000. Since there arn't 25 board members, we can say the population is less than 500,000.
Thats how I see it.
umm, where is the question? i don't see it...



Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 4

Re: DS  Population [#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Jun 2007, 11:16
A is simple. if there are 25members there are 500K ppl. if you have 23 members you have <500K ppl.
i am more interested to see how would you solve B. (hey i know you do not have to solve it, but show me how you got to the answer that is sufficient.



CEO
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2950

If there are 51 board members you can determine exactly what the population is.
500000 (for the first 25) + (26 * 30000)
Then you can get the actual current population by dividing this figure by 3. I am not going to do the math , since all that is important here is know how would you derive the solution.



Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 349

Re: DS  Population [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Jun 2007, 19:32
Amit05 wrote: My argument here is that Statement1 is insufficient here. Though it says that the number of members on the board is 23, the population can be equal to 500,000 also.
Please explain.
I´d say the problem is not properly worded. Some boards may have the policy to allow a varying number of representatives for a given population range, while others would have more exacting policies.



Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 285

you need to be logged on as a member to see images i believe
r019h wrote: galt wrote: If the town had 25 board members, then the population is at least 500,000. Since there arn't 25 board members, we can say the population is less than 500,000.
Thats how I see it. umm, where is the question? i don't see it...



Director
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 591
Location: Kuwait

25 > representing 500,000 people.
addition 1 > representing 30,000
is the population less than 25 ?
(1) there were 23 members on the board.

I really don't see how this can be explained. It's intuitive, commonsense ..
25 members representing the first 500,000 people. There are 23 members > population has not yet reached the
500,000 limit.
statement 1 is sufficient
(2) if population was 3 times as large, the board would have had 51 members

51 members > 25 for the first 500,000
51  25 = 26 x 30,000 = 780,000
Total population = 500k + 780k = 1,280,000 /3 < 500,000 for sure
Statement 2 is sufficient
ANSWER: D



CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2560

Def. D.
Stmnt 1: we know the population is equal to or less than 500,000 so it is sufficient.
Stmnt 2: No point in showing math, its easy to see how this one is sufficient.
I can see where this can send alarm bells b/c on the GMAT we can't assume anything. We do know that it can't be over 500,000 if there are only 23members. Try it from this angle:
500,000/25=20000 So 1 member represents 20,000 people under the 500,000mark. So 23 would equal:460,000. So yes stmnt 1 is sufficient.










