Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the dropdowns below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
77%
(02:10)
correct 23%
(02:42)
wrong
based on 2045
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Nation Z experienced a rapid increase in total public school enrollment from 1997 through 2007, as shown in the graph. Also shown in the graph are the average (arithmetic mean) appropriations per student enrolled in public school in Nation Z during this period.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
Of the years 1997, 1999, and 2001, the least total appropriations for public school students in Nation Z occurred in .
Of the years 2003, 2005, and 2007, the greatest total appropriations for public school students in Nation Z occurred in .
Nation Z experienced a rapid increase in total public school enrollment from 1997 through 2007, as shown in the graph. Also shown in the graph are the average (arithmetic mean) appropriations per student enrolled in public school in Nation Z during this period.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
Of the years 1997, 1999, and 2001, the least total appropriations for public school students in Nation Z occurred in
Of the years 2003, 2005, and 2007, the greatest total appropriations for public school students in Nation Z occurred in
Show more
On the scale on the left are the enrolments and on the scale on the right are the appropriations per student.
Total Appropriations = Number of Enrolments * Appropriations per student
Of the years 1997, 1999, and 2001, the least total appropriations for public school students in Nation Z occurred in ____
We have to compare the first 3 bars. Just looking at the graph, we see that in 1997, the enrolment was the least and the appropriation per student was the least too. Then automatically, total appropriations in 1997 would be the least. ANSWER
Of the years 2003, 2005, and 2007, the greatest total appropriations for public school students in Nation Z occurred in ____
Now we have to compare the last 3 bars. Appropriation per student for 2005 and 2007 are the same but enrolment is 2007 is higher so we ignore 2005. Now 2003 has higher appropriation per student but 2007 has higher enrolment. So we must calculate here.
2003 - Total = 520 * 1600 = 8,32,000 2007 - Total = 570 * 1400 = 7,98,000
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.