asmba
Can you please share explanations for Q2 & Q3?
Q2. (B) Logic Reasoning (Parallel Reasoning)
Identify the Question TypeThe correct answer will be a situation “most similar” to one described in the passage. That makes this a Parallel Reasoning question like those found in Logical Reasoning.
Research the Relevant TextThe question asks about how the term “trickster” is applied to the picaro. That’s described in the first and second paragraphs, before the author goes into great detail about each group separately.
Make a PredictionIn the first paragraph, the author mentions that “trickster” was applied to picaros because the two character types share several features (they’re both heroes, they live on the periphery, they’re flawed). Yet, in the second paragraph, the author argues that there are actually “essential differences between them.” The correct answer will describe another situation in which a term for one entity is applied to another, apparently similar entity, while the two entities in fact have a significant underlying difference.
Evaluate the Answer Choices(B) is correct. In this case, the label “bear” is applied to pandas. While pandas and bears are said to be similar, there’s a significant difference: pandas are actually related to raccoons.
(A) does not match. This just describes a misclassification of one person. There’s no comparison between two similar people who have significant differences.
(C) does not match. This just provides the reasoning behind applying a certain term. There is no indication that the application overlooks any important differences.
(D) does not match. This is an example of an appropriate term that one should not take too literally. The label “evergreen” distinguishes conifers (like pine trees) from deciduous trees; it does not mean an evergreen tree’s needles never turn brown or fall off.
(E) does not match. This just describes why the term “aggressive” is applied to certain weeds. There’s no mention of a significant difference that makes the term inappropriate.
Q3. (C) Logic Function
Identify the Question TypeThe phrase “in order to” indicates a Logic Function question—one that asks why the author included a particular detail or how the detail is used.
Research the Relevant TextThe question refers directly to a claim from the third paragraph. Be sure to consider the purpose of the entire paragraph and how it relates to information elsewhere in the passage.
Make a PredictionThe phrase in question refers to tricksters, claiming that they are not a foil to a corrupt society. While it may seem like a simple note about tricksters, the purpose of the paragraph as a whole is to show how tricksters are different from picaros. In fact, the claim in question is a direct counterpoint to the claim in the second paragraph that picaros are foils to a hypocritical society. So, the phrase from the third paragraph is used to distinguish tricksters from picaros.
Evaluate the Answer Choices(C) precisely matches the prediction and is correct.
(A) is Out of Scope. The author does not mention tricksters having “supernatural powers.” Moreover, the author goes on to say that tricksters are comic because their misbehavior is so “mortal.”
(B) is a 180. Picaros are foils, while tricksters are not. The claim in question shows how they are different, not similar.
(D) is a 180. The claim in question describes a way in which tricksters are not used to comment on society. How they’re actually used is described later in the paragraph.
(E) is a Faulty Use of Detail. The claim in question refers to tricksters. According to the second paragraph, however, it is picaros, not tricksters, who are seen as disruptive.