Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:37 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
SudiptoGmat
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Last visit: 09 Dec 2015
Posts: 86
Own Kudos:
2,510
 [53]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: India
Posts: 86
Kudos: 2,510
 [53]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
47
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,982
 [5]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,982
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
PhunsukWangdu
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Last visit: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
32
 [2]
Posts: 12
Kudos: 32
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shalva
User avatar
Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Last visit: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 203
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools:Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Posts: 203
Kudos: 342
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Stimulus contains several facts, not an argument (it lacks conclusion)

Let's summarize the facts:
1) One cannot patent naturally occurring chemical, after its structure has been published
2) To use the chemical as a drug, its structure and effects should be published.

It means that if some natural chemical is used as a drug, its structure has already been published. So nobody can patent it again.


It's (D)
User avatar
amp0201
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Last visit: 14 Aug 2013
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 115
Kudos: 132
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My answer is D.

Since once the structure is published, you cannot patent the naturally occuring chemicals.
You cannot use the natural compound as a drug till it gets tested.

Thus the sequence of event looks like -

Structure gets published -> tested -> Aprroval/Denial

Hence we cannot patents the drug which is approved.

OA please. Thanks.
User avatar
himanshurajawat
Joined: 05 Aug 2018
Last visit: 11 Jan 2021
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
13
 [2]
Given Kudos: 138
Posts: 32
Kudos: 13
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma Ma'am, I'm having trouble understanding the 'E' option. Can you please explain it?
User avatar
AbhishekDhanraJ72
Joined: 15 Apr 2020
Last visit: 02 Feb 2025
Posts: 174
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,217
GMAT 1: 620 Q45 V30
Products:
GMAT 1: 620 Q45 V30
Posts: 174
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can someone explain why not B???
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,883
 [3]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,883
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The correct answer is option D.

Understanding the passage
1. Once their structures get published, naturally occurring chemicals (say, C) cannot be newly patented
2. NOC need to be out through the same rigorous testing program as any synthetic program before they can be used as a drug
3. This testing program results in a published report that details the chemical structure, effects, etc.

What this means:

1) To get cleared for use as a drug: C -> testing program -> published report (including structure) -> Cleared for use as a drug

2) Getting newly patented: C -> if structure gets published -> then C cannot be newly patented

Combining the above,

If C has been cleared for use as a drug, then
1. A report with its structure must have been published
2. Which means that it cannot be newly patented

(D) Once a naturally occurring compound has been approved for use as a drug, it can no longer be newly patented.


Option D is exactly what we arrived at

(A) Any naturally occurring chemical can be reproduced synthetically once its structure is known.
We cannot infer this. We have no idea if knowing the structure equates to being able to reproduce the structure synthetically.

(B) Synthetically produced chemical compounds cannot be patented unless their chemical structures are made public.
The passage only tells us that naturally occurring chemicals cannot be patented if their structures are published. We cannot be sure the same rule applies to synthetically produced chemical compounds. Maybe or maybe not. It is not necessary the same rules apply!

(C) If proven no less effective, naturally occurring chemicals are to be preferred to synthetic compounds for use in drugs.
Effectiveness and preference are completely out of the scope of this passage, which is specifically about patenting and process to get approved for usage as a drug. How effective the chemicals are is beyond scope.

(E) A naturally occurring chemical cannot be patented unless its effectiveness as a drug has been rigorously established.
Can be a confusing choice. But we need to remember - whether a naturally occurring chemical can be patented or not depends on whether its structure is published as per the passage. Nowhere in the passage do we see any indication that the effectiveness of the drug will influence its patenting.

This drug may be very effective or completely ineffective - it will not impact its patenting process.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
AbhishekDhanraJ72
Joined: 15 Apr 2020
Last visit: 02 Feb 2025
Posts: 174
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,217
GMAT 1: 620 Q45 V30
Products:
GMAT 1: 620 Q45 V30
Posts: 174
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"it must be put through the same rigorous testing program as any synthetic compound" is that not enough to sat that same rule apply.
User avatar
AbhishekDhanraJ72
Joined: 15 Apr 2020
Last visit: 02 Feb 2025
Posts: 174
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,217
GMAT 1: 620 Q45 V30
Products:
GMAT 1: 620 Q45 V30
Posts: 174
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
The correct answer is option D.

Understanding the passage
1. Once their structures get published, naturally occurring chemicals (say, C) cannot be newly patented
2. NOC need to be out through the same rigorous testing program as any synthetic program before they can be used as a drug
3. This testing program results in a published report that details the chemical structure, effects, etc.

What this means:

1) To get cleared for use as a drug: C -> testing program -> published report (including structure) -> Cleared for use as a drug

2) Getting newly patented: C -> if structure gets published -> then C cannot be newly patented

Combining the above,

If C has been cleared for use as a drug, then
1. A report with its structure must have been published
2. Which means that it cannot be newly patented

(D) Once a naturally occurring compound has been approved for use as a drug, it can no longer be newly patented.


Option D is exactly what we arrived at

(A) Any naturally occurring chemical can be reproduced synthetically once its structure is known.
We cannot infer this. We have no idea if knowing the structure equates to being able to reproduce the structure synthetically.

(B) Synthetically produced chemical compounds cannot be patented unless their chemical structures are made public.
The passage only tells us that naturally occurring chemicals cannot be patented unless their structures are published. We cannot be sure the same rule applies to synthetically produced chemical compounds. Maybe or maybe not. It is not necessary the same rules apply!

(C) If proven no less effective, naturally occurring chemicals are to be preferred to synthetic compounds for use in drugs.
Effectiveness and preference are completely out of the scope of this passage, which is specifically about patenting and process to get approved for usage as a drug. How effective the chemicals are is beyond scope.

(E) A naturally occurring chemical cannot be patented unless its effectiveness as a drug has been rigorously established.
Can be a confusing choice. But we need to remember - whether a naturally occurring chemical can be patented or not depends on whether its structure is published as per the passage. Nowhere in the passage do we see any indication that the effectiveness of the drug will influence its patenting.

This drug may be very effective or completely ineffective - it will not impact its patenting process.

Hope this helps.

it must be put through the same rigorous testing program as any synthetic compound, from this, cant we say thats enough to apply same rules???
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,883
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey Abhishek,

Actually, the phrase - "it must be put through the same rigorous testing program as any synthetic compound" is specific to getting a naturally occurring chemical approved for use as a drug. This phrase is specific to process to get approval for usage as a drug, and is not talking about patenting.

Option B talks about patenting only - and has nothing to do with the above process. All we know about patenting is that a naturally occurring chemical cannot be patented, once its structure is published. But we cannot say the same about synthetic chemical compounds.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
Sanchitdd
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Jul 2020
Last visit: 04 Apr 2022
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106
Location: India
Schools: NTU (M$)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 4
Schools: NTU (M$)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 68
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Understand the answer D, but I feel that the sentence has been poorly constructed.

"IT" in the second clause could refer to drug or natural compound. If the "it" refers to natural compound then bingo but else it doesn't make sense.

However no other option comes close therefore D has to be chosen nonetheless.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,835
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,835
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts