Namangupta1997 wrote:
Hi
AndrewN Couple of questions (as I keep getting this question wrong) :
1. In the correct answer, isn't a bit illogical to say "the Neanderthals had a vocal track " ? It seems like it is saying that all
Neanderthals shared a common vocal track.
2. Why is option E incorrect ? Is it because it makes "vocal tracks" as the subject , and hence it does not logically connects to the clause after "and" ?
Hello,
Namangupta1997. No, it is no more illogical to say that Neanderthals had a vocal tract than to say that humans have a digestive system. No one would reasonably argue that all humans are understood to share a digestive system. Rather, the context of the sentence suggests that the digestive system is a shared characteristic of humans, just as a vocal tract was a common trait among Neanderthals.
You are absolutely right about the answer to your second question. You have to be really careful to consider the full sentence on these tougher questions. A comparison may be correct, but you cannot lose track of the subject itself. Here is the sentence with (E) inserted (I will highlight the main clause in
blue):
Quote:
The vocal tracts of the Neanderthals resembled those of the apes and so were probably without language...
Vocal tracts were without language? In light of the fact that vocal tracts are not considered independent living organisms, but are rather part of the body of an animal, it does not make sense to write the above. It is
the Neanderthals who are thought to have been without language, and this understanding alone can whittle down the answer pool to (A) and (B) pretty quickly. I like this question because it does a great job of distracting a test-taker with a comparison when the overarching consideration is one of meaning.
Perhaps the question makes more sense now. Thank you for thinking to ask.
- Andrew